 What are some of the social benefits and impacts created by developing energy sources, especially shale oil and shale gas? So in Pennsylvania, we've seen a range of impacts and on the positive side economic growth jobs in particular in particularly in rural areas that have been seeing economic decline for the last couple decades Although some of the research indicates that Morph is for workers coming in than for resident workers. So there's a question mark as in terms of economic benefits One particular economic benefit is leasing and royalty income households have seen thousands and hundreds of thousands of dollars of an increase in in Income from development if they own their subsurface rights and lease those out And what we've seen is that people are spending that money largely on savings or paying off debt They're investing in their future Which is a very positive thing for for many rural communities On the other side we are seeing that we did see things particularly early in the development having to do with you know population growth stressing community services leading to increases in crime traffic and safety issues associated with the trucks on the roads Noise in particular is an issue near develop near the wells And communities having to adapt to new commuting patterns because roads are closed Challenges in getting kids to school safety concerns about the roads. Those are the primary kinds of impacts. We've seen community conflict in some Some communities has also come up as some people are opposed and some people are supportive especially around decisions like Moratoria or ordinances or leasing of public land as being the prime points of conflict In terms of how that compares to other shale plays in the US The Marcellus is very unique in that it's a it's a big region with very small communities and relatively large cities like Pittsburgh And and Williamsport anchoring that that geographic space So the development has been what we call hub and spoke where? Where the companies will locate headquarters or regional offices in the larger cities and fan their Workers out across an hour or two worth drive From those cities. So the kinds of impacts are different depending on where you are in that geographic space Because it's the workers that are the core of that impact just the presence of more people leading to that that growth Housing has probably been the other place that's the most impacted Workers need to live somewhere Even if it's temporary or if it's a more permanent relocation. So housing prices did go up rental units The rent was higher which pushed families lower on the economic ladder out of that Out of the market essentially So there were a number of issues relating to displacement homelessness and stress on emergency services to respond to that displacement So the other big difference between the Marcellus and those other regions is that we do have Highly interconnected road system particularly in the southwest part of the state a little less so in the northern tier So that allowed workers to disperse more than perhaps would be the comparison in other shale plays Particularly the Bakken the Bakken is also very rural, but very spread out And that and very very rural I mean the density compared population density comparison between the two areas is they're very different So workers going into the Bakken had a much harder time finding Housing and services that they needed so the much greater impacts and across the board were seen in the Bakken as compared to the Marcellus