 The US 2020 Facebook and Instagram election study who operated with Meta to get access to data that wouldn't otherwise be available. Neither removing the reshares or using chronological feeds significantly changed anybody's polarization or political attitudes, even though exposure to content from like-minded sources did not seem to make people more polarized. The thing with chronological feed, in my opinion, my theory on it anyway, is those algorithms, they work. They're more interesting to read. Your chronological feed may or may not have the most interesting stuff at the time, right? Because it's just in the order it was posted, and it's not like people are always posting the most interesting stuff, whereas the algorithm is going like, I'm pretty sure I know what's going to keep you reading. So that's my guess as to why people bounced when they went chronological is they just, they got bored faster. But it makes sense that the companies want to keep you on because that's how they're getting paid, right?