 One of the problems with methane, it's a very potent greenhouse gas, as I said. Natural gas is mostly methane, and coming out of the COP 21 negotiations last year in Paris, the nations have agreed to keep the planet well below 2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial baseline. In fact, the only way to do that is to reduce methane emissions. If we reduce carbon dioxide emissions, which we must do, the climate system has lags and the planet will continue to warm for 30 to 40 years. The only way to slow global warming is to reduce methane emissions, and at the moment, the natural gas industry is the largest source of methane pollution in the world. So we really need to get off of this kick of natural gas. It's an absolutely terrible path. Some, let's say, gel from the Netherlands or from the Netherlands, Total, from France, Winterschall, Germany, and from the United States, Dow Chemical, Chevron and Exxon. There are two types of subsidies that the oil industry has, beyond the unconventional ones. On the one hand, what is called the Criollo Barrier, which is an internal price of the oil barrel, which at the moment, according to the low price of the international oil barrel, is the double of the value that the difference is guaranteed to the state from public income, so that the extraction of non-conventional hydrocarbons is precisely profitable. The other way is that companies define what forms they pay for the regalia, which are the taxes that are paid to the national and provincial state for being extracting hydrocarbons in the territory of the country. Sahara rely on huge water resources, which are in the aquifers, and those water resources are not renewable, actually. So if companies start fracking for those resources, there is a huge risk that those water resources would be contaminated, which make their livelihood endangered in a way because they rely on that water for the agriculture, for their survival, in very, very hard environments. This push towards more extreme ways of energy is not going to benefit the people in there, because as we've seen before, even with natural gas and oil, those towns are not benefiting from those resources. The main beneficiaries of those resources are first the dictatorial and corrupt regimes in place, the multinational and western governments. So all those resources are extracted in a way to further the interest of a minority at the expense of a majority. We have the acknowledgement that it is a problem, and that's new. Four years ago, politicians would laugh at you and just ignore the problem, and nobody can ignore it at the moment in the Netherlands, which is for us one big win already. They did lower the gas production, but long way not enough. For us, the biggest win at this moment is actually that we're establishing a big community movement by all different people, with all different motivations standing in one front, and who are now preparing to, in the next five years, let the resistance grow and get the interaction and get the voices out. You know, one of the biggest reasons that we were able to stop the Keystone XL was because we had this unlikely alliance of farmers, ranchers, tribal nations, and environmentalists all working together and all working at the same table. A lot of times in these environmental fights, you have a bunch of climate groups that come in from kind of national or international and then try to, you know, win a local fight. This was the complete opposite. We had local folks on the ground working hand in hand with the national international groups, and we also had funders also funding the local groups and the national international groups. So there was this equalization of power. So the local folks weren't kind of drowned out by the kind of voices of national folks. So we really did work kind of as a family, and we were in the trenches for over six years, and so we had to be a family, both in the highs and lows and the fights of that families normally have, and we went through it together and we eventually obviously won.