 Ladies and gentlemen, very warm welcome to module 150. Leadership characteristics of entrepreneurship. We started from the corporate, then the profit motives, then the culture, and then the relationship between the corporate, culture, relation, the human capital, digitization, AI, robotic engineering and all. So moving on, what is the difference between, and we here we discuss and understand, what is the difference between the corporate and entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurial development is as I always telling you, and now I have done a lot of tests, and every day I spend myself doing a lot of tests, and I am still seeing that the things that are coming out of human psychology, what is the fault of digitization? No, according to my understanding, even today, human psychology is not as important as it always was. Entrepreneurship also makes humans, entrepreneurial idea also develops humans. The difference between entrepreneur and the corporate is that the corporate only sees profit motives and minuses the human capital, and when they use the human capital, then they use philanthropic moves as well, when they put the budget of their advertisement and campaigns in the philanthropic moves. That is, to distribute filters in the winters, there is a philanthropic campaign for them, that is, which company is giving the best results. How many people have given food to which company, so as much as the budget had to go into something else, that is, it had to go into commercials, when 10% of it will be put on this thing, then the name will be too big. So, those companies are launching a business, those companies are giving sweaters, those companies are serving people in severe conditions. So, these are the kinds of things, but what profits are they taking with them? Are they using chemicals? Are they using things? Are they giving something to people? Are they making things more precise and saving their resources? That is a different game. But now, here it comes to leadership. Now, what is leadership? To understand the environment one, is visionary and flexible? Or is create management options, encourage teamwork, encourage open discussion, building a collision of supporters or persists? Persistence is the most important thing in every culture. Then, the entrepreneurship leadership examples we discuss. As mentioned in this book called the entrepreneurial mindset, I would recommend that you read this book. Macmillan says that the word becoming too, a troubling and unpredictable to use conventional leadership strategies. Some of the most notable people that are considered naturally born entrepreneurial leaders of the today, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Max Zürichberg and Richard Banson. In my say, Steve Jobs, he worked, he think of the other word, he think of the new word, he think of the 21st century. He put the word from the digital to the touch, from the button to the touch and the touch is everything. And not even touch. Touch doesn't work, just your eyes, your computer is working. Then is the Bill Gates, not accidental of course. But the basic billionaires are very sure. There are people who start something dramatically, accidentally. But there are 90% of people in your surroundings who are basic billionaires. They are short cuts. Please don't follow the basics. Don't follow the short cuts. You go through a process, Bill Gates worked for 18-19 hours. But he worked on a concept, he didn't strict anyone's ideas. He shared someone's ideas, he listened to them. But it doesn't mean that he replicated their ideas. We have a concept of replication which means theft. You are replicating, you are taking time for theft. But don't do this. We are inspiring Jeff Bezos. We are inspiring your different people. They are just the accidentals. You started your platform, your ideas, you became a hero on Instagram. You took so many likes on Instagram. You don't take so many likes by doing a proper movie. You take only two steps of your dance. You don't practice your dance. They go in your head. Tick-tock has become the world. So you move away from this. The ideas are developed based on the entire depth, procedure, the SOP standards operating procedures. And then you test a new innovation. Then these leaders all seem to have strong desire to resolve challenges collectively and promote the environment of the growth. The environment of the growth makes the world easier. When it comes to digitization, it is easy for humans to achieve. Your universe is a universe. And within that universe, a universe is a human being. When a human being starts eating humans, then this is not called innovation. This is not called growth. If digitization, AI technology, robust technology, and all these things go beyond humans, then this means that you have made a huge mistake. Today, humans are growing by killing humans. That is unfair. That is completely unfair. This is not entrepreneurship. Follow exemplary leadership. Don't follow shortcuts. Now, moving on, as a prime example, we will study the leadership style of the Steve Jobs. What is largely considered as the key of his success? One is focus. As I told you, I took an example. I took a lot of names. I am not taking names, but you can understand that they are shortcuts. But I took an example of Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs is not the rest. He is not Jeff Bezos. But what was his focus? It was ingrained in the Jobs personality and had been haunted by the Zen training. He relentlessly filtered out what he considered distractions. He finished his distractions. He filtered and focused. Then simplify. Job aim to a simplicity that comes from the conquering, rather than merely ignoring complexity, then is a responsibility. He took responsibility. And then went behind, leave frog, and then put product before the profit. Now, this is very much important as I have focused. Continuously on one word. Put product before profit. Put product before profit. Don't worry about the price. Just specify the computer's ability. This is my precise understanding towards the entrepreneurship is put product before profit. Put product before profit. Thank you very much.