Loading...

9/11 Clifton Cloud Interview And Source Clips (NBC Exclusive)

1,850 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Sep 28, 2014

On 9/11 three 'amatuer' cameramen appeared on TV giving interviews with their videos. Clifton was one of them. Im personally very suspect of every talking head and every image that appeared on the 9/11 terror show. The plane videos just look real fake. Ive never seen a shapeshifting 767 blob in real life, except in a bad UFO hoax video. Go find any video that looks like the 9/11 videos, you cant. Ive been searching for years for a real blob video to compare with the 9/11 blobs. Real plane videos dont look like this. Even before the NIST releases, this video stuck out as strange to me. The blob was the blackest object in the video, completely devoid of any reflective light, except for the the halo around it. Also there were quick flashes of strange horizontal offset zones in the lightpoles, especially when he zooms in. Cliftons story is like many other suspicious videographers that say they same dumb 'accidental shot' story as they live action zoom in during the shot. Clifton does not zoom in, except during the plane and explosion, but it was an accident? Probability says he is a liar, just like the rest of the coincidental accidental zoomers. Its a pattern. From an objective standpoint the video just looked fake. Im not the only one that noticed this. Even Peter Jennings says the planes look like a bad graphic animation. If it looks fake, it probably is fake. Recently, I ran an AVI script analysis on the raw NIST version and unsurprisingly the video has twice as much data stored in each frame during the first 1000 frames, coinciding with the blob and explosion portion of the video. Initially it starts with over 15,000 kb per frame and by frame 2100, after the blob and explosion, the video has roughly 8000 kb per frame. The video portion has a variable bit rate while the audio does not, signifying they came from two different devices. I tried to deinterlace it using separate fields, eliminating the odd or even layers, complimented parity, and bob. The video still shows major compression error from the 15,000 kb of data being crunched into the original 8000 kb per frame video. After further visual analysis, we see the smoke has multiple layers pasted over each other. The blob has missing and added frames. The WTC towers grey color blends far into the sky at the left of each. There is no sky between the buildings and the South Towers color extends far out into the sky. The highly reflective lightpole in front of the smoke is covered and obscured by the smoke behind it. The building to the far left looks like the smoke is coming from it or flowing back into it. The smoke itself pulses, jumps, and constricts horizontally with a fat error line where the upper and lower sky layers blend and overlap. When slow motioned the smoke reverses frames. You can verify, re-create, and confirm all this yourself with basic video software. From what I can tell, this video looks like it was made by the same people with the same software that the Evan Fairbanks video was made with. Download a copy of this or the NIST file and enhance it and watch it in slow motion, sharpen, and color - contrast enhance, focusing on the video without looking at the blob. Look at the poles, the buildings, the foreground, and the smoke. You will discover the truth about Clifton's video. If you don't want to know, that's fine too, acting dumb seems to be the truth for many "truthers".

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...