 his rhetoric has caught the address of Americans I think in part because he's speaking in a kind of bombastic style that taps into the kind of you know us versus them tribalism that's on the rise here. I want to take a quick look at a rant he went on against leftists who he says have ruined Argentina's economy. he says you can't negotiate with the south, you can't negotiate with that shit, you can't negotiate because they're going to take you down. And as we're being so much better than that, as we're pushing them into the cultural battle, we're going up because we're not only winning in the productive way, we're superior morally, we're superior aesthetically, we're better at everything, and it hurts, it hurts. So as they can't fight with the legitimate tools, they're going to repress the state by putting little towers to make us shit, and yet they can't, they can't, they had to go down the note, they had to go down the note. You understand me? They're losing, they're desperate, they're losing the cultural battle, the sordid shit, for the first time they see the sordid shit. It's an intense captivating clip. Do you agree with his sentiment that in Argentina you can't negotiate with the leftist coalition because they'll use the state apparatus to squelch that debate and take everything away from you? Can I go? I absolutely agree. If you see it all over Latin America, when the left doesn't win in the elections, they completely destroy the country. We have seen it in Chile, we have seen it in Colombia, we've seen it also in Brazil with the support to Lula. So the left is obsessed with ruling from democracy when they win or by making a lot of, by making violence in the streets. I also agree with how Milay communicates because he's engaging for decades. We have seen libertarians saying, well, yeah, we have the right ideas, but no passion at all. And here comes a guy with a lot of passion. Now the fact that we are adopting terms like cultural battle worries me because this is exactly what the Nazis or the fascists did. They want to state, to implement a culture by law, a culture of hatred. And then he says, we are morally superior than the shitty socialists. I agree that libertarianism is morally superior. Hell, objectivism is morally superior because it tells you that individuals are not animals of sacrifice to the state or the church. Now libertarians, I can say, are morally superior because they defend the individual. When Javier Milay adopts conservatism, religious estates, and he talks about moral superiority, I am worried if he's going to use the state in order to implement one kind of culture. So what are we talking about there? And he even says we are aesthetically superior because he says that people in the libertarian movement are more pretty than all these women in the Marxist collectives that are not even like shaving their legs or whatever. And I'm like, yeah, okay, yeah, the market makes us prettier, but those are libertarian stance. So then again, I think now that Javier Milay is taking international protagonism, we have a massive opportunity to educate people in the United States and in Latin America of what libertarianism is about. So if he governs, and when he governs, we can be very, very accurate. Because what I'm worried, what I really don't want to happen is that if he comes to government and he betrays liberty, people will blame liberty instead of blaming him, which is what happened with Pinochet. It's been a headache for libertarians all over the region to, you know, like take ourselves away from that Pinochet dictatorship, which was a capitalist dictatorship. And as Mario Vargas Llosa said, there is no such thing as a good dictatorship and a bad dictatorship. All are bad. So I am very worried that if libertarians don't take this opportunity worldwide, if he comes into power and liberty is betrayed, people will blame neoliberalism, capitalism when they are not the ones to be blamed. The issues that kind of led to Milay's rise, which I think are largely the economy, the central bank, and the way that the political class, or I think as you put it, the cast that is the way Milay frames it. I've pulled one more clip that I think will take us into that discussion, which is Milay again directing a lot of passion and anger with very heated rhetoric, but in a direction that I think a lot of libertarians would agree is warranted at corrupt political elites. So let's take a look at this and discuss. The main promoters of this idea are the politicians. The politicians are a sort of sociopaths who want to make us believe that we are invalid, mental, invalid in every sense, because we can't live if it's not for them. In reality those who can't live if we are them. That is, if the country separates between those we produce on one side and the other side is the shit of the politicians, the unionists, all this set of parasites. They sink, they die. We separate Argentina from Argentina from the north and Argentina from the south. You know what? Those of us who are willing to work, we go to the poorest part of the country, we leave all of them dead. Even when they stay with everything, these rats are going to sink, because they don't help at all. On the other hand, those of us who work and we know how to win our lives, you know what? We are going to go well. We are people of good will, people who work. And we don't live by voting for envy, hatred, resentment, theft. Yes, the same deal as the law, which is that immundity of social justice, which is the most unfair thing that exists, because it implies stealing from a person the fruit of their work to give it to whom I want to give it to, but where did this Manga of Satrapa come from? So, you know what? They want to stay in this country, you know what? They have to identify the enemy. The enemy are the politicians. We have to go against the politicians. Those are our enemies. Those are the ones that sink us in poverty. Those are the only ones who have progressed with this version of social justice and the redistribution of income. The real redistribution of income was from what we elaborate on the parasites of the politicians. Let's see, let's see, why liberalism was born? To get out of the prison of the monarchs. That is, then it cannot be that in a country, if you go better to the parasites of politics, what kind of guy produces? That is, you cannot go better if you are a parasite of politics that does not produce anything, that when you do something, the only thing you do is damage, because one of the things that happens every time the state intervenes, is generated what is called the failure of the state. That is, look at this, the plans against the poor are that the poor are generated. Look at the Argentine case. So, I mean, the person who first shared that clip with me commented that it almost seems ripped from the pages of an Iran novel. I want to start with Gloria this time, but Eduardo, you can share any thoughts too. Just what are your reactions to Millay's message there? I absolutely agree. Actually, I have said the same thing in different words in many forums, because in Latin America, the majority of people do not understand that the government doesn't produce wealth. There is a misconception that the government is sort of like a magic spaceship where money is magically created and the politicians grant you with resources and money that magically they possess. People do not get the basic idea that every cent that the government has is because they have taken even violently from the people who produced it. So, if you don't understand that the politicians are your employees and you think that they are the kings that grant you rights and grant you resources, of course, you blindly obey to whatever they are going to say. And of course, the politicians are going to have a cognition mentality, because that cognition mentality is the one that grants them all the powers to control the economy. It is really rare to have a politician that is going to have a free market approach. So, I absolutely agree. And about politicians being sociopaths, I've said this multiple times. I think that we need to have not only analyze our politicians by their resume, but we should also have them, for what Eduardo said, emotional intelligence tests, psychological tests, because I believe that Latin America has been governed by narcissists and sociopaths. And I always say when people tell me, because of the way that I express myself, they say, oh, you have mental problems. And I'm like, yeah, I have no problem to be tested in psychology tests or MRI or whatever, but just please make it very neutral. Because if you put me with conservative shrinks or with socialist shrinks, of course they're going to declare me crazy, right? But I do believe that emotional intelligence is something that the world needs in their leaders. And not only in Latin America, worldwide, it's something that is highly needed. Hey, thanks for watching that clip from my conversation with Gloria Alvarez and Eduardo Marti about the rise of Javier Millay in Argentina. For the full conversation, click right here. For another clip from that conversation, go right here.