 Question. What happens when you have two equally adjacent but conflicting and illegal rights? How do you work out that conflict? I don't think it exists. Two people in the sea, I'm sorry there's a hypothesis I promised you, perhaps an example would exist. Two people on a boat in the sea that will only support one person. Neither on the boat and the boat that will just provide a life. Look, individual rights don't exist on a lifeboat. It is not such a thing. Morality is not about lifeboats. Morality is about day-to-day living. Morality about what really happens in real life. What happens on a lifeboat? On a lifeboat, all of the tectanic and emergency situations, whatever happens happens. You know, you throw the guy over and you live or you jump over and you commit suicide. Both choices are horrible. They're really, really bad, but that's not what life is about. In an emergency, you know, do what it takes. But life is not an emergency. 99.99999999% of life is not emergencies. And ethics and intellectual pursuits and politics and philosophy is not about the point 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1% of lifeboat situations. They're just not interested. They're boring. But that means that for every person who is so poor that they're in an emergency, any action is a discipline. No, because so many people who are poor are not in an emergency situation. People who are poor can go and work. People who are poor can go and beg. People who are poor can go to a charity and ask for charity. There are a thousand opportunities for people who are poor to gain the things that they need in order to survive. It's not an emergency. It's not a lifeboat situation, which is truly the only situation in life. Or in the point 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1% of life, where it's a zero-sum game. But life is not about a zero-sum game. Life is about win-win situations all around us all the time. The essence of human interaction is win-win. It's not lose-lose, which is what a lifeboat is. A lifeboat is no winner. You're screwed. But that's not life. That's not life. Poor people have lots of jobs out there, particularly under capitalism. There are more jobs than you can fill under capitalism. There's negative unemployment in capitalism. There's always a deficiency of jobs under capitalism. If you just lower the minimum wage to zero, you'll see how many jobs are created just like that. I mean, an unemployed, a big chunk of unemployed in any society are those people who just can't produce up to the level of the minimum wage. It's just not worth ten bucks an hour. It's as ugly as it is to say it. They're just not worth it. They're worth five. But they live a better life when they're five than they do unemployed. But we deny them the job that will pay them five. And there was a surprise when jobs go to China, or someone else. We're denying them help. We're rejecting their ability to make a living here. We're hurting everyone.