 Well, Cecilia, it's not warm but very hot in Delhi and thank God I am travelling to a cooler place in the next couple of days. Well, with regard to your question, to begin with, in February 2019, Hong Kong had proposed an extradition bill whereby offenders in the former British colony, now an autonomous territory in southeastern China, could be extradited to mainland China, Taiwan and Macao. Hong Kong's legal system, as you know, is based on the rule of law. It has its own legal system in contrast to law of People's Republic of China under the principle of one country, two systems, which combines English common law and local legislations codified. Hong Kong has entered into an extradition agreement with 20 countries, but ironically, no such agreement is signed with mainland China, despite ongoing negotiations within the past almost two decades. The bill proposed consequent to the request for surrender of a Hong Kong suspect in a homicide case as you would recollect in Taiwan, where a 20 year old pregnant girl was murdered by her boyfriend while they were holidaying in Taiwan. Hong Kong authorities, although had arrested him, but they failed to charge him under mother offence. Taiwan authorities asked the Hong Kong government to deport the accused, but Hong Kong had no such arrangement. Hence, subsequently, the fugitive offenders and mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, legislation amendment bill 2019 was proposed establishing a mechanism of case-by-case transfer of fugitives. The key provisions of the fugitive offenders ordinance distinguishes case-based surrender arrangements from general long-term surrender arrangements. The critics obviously of this new proposed law fear that residents will be vulnerable to China's flawed legal system, which will curb their judicial independence. This has led to hundreds and thousands of residents taking to street to protest against the bill. But as I look at it as an expert, the passage of this law now cannot be obstructed in any which way.