 social contract of Hobbes. In this session we are going to discuss the topic of social contract of Hobbes and definitely with reference to the other perspectives. So in political philosophy a social contract is an actual or hypothetical compact or agreement between the ruled or between the ruled and their rulers. Defining each party's rights and responsibilities. Basically, first of all, if we understand how to see or understand the social contract, then we can say that it is an agreement between the people and then it can be between the people and their ruler. There can be two dimensions, So individuals were born into an anarchic state of nature in given the philosophy given by various philosophers as well as definitely by Hobbes and they can be happy with their circumstances or might be unhappy with the situation and that is depending on the version of the theory. So then they can build a society and a government by the use of natural reasons and a social compact. So we can say that social contract theory, it is as old as philosophy itself and it's a way that persons' moral and or political obligations are dependent upon a contract on or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Basically social contract, as well as the government itself. So Hobbes' political philosophy can be broken into two parts, number one, psychological egoism, his theory of human drive and his notion of social compact. Hobbes' philosophy has a lot of social compact importance because in his book Leviton, the basic debate is in the context of how human life is, what is the nature of human nature, what is the relationship between them, morality and politics because each person has their own interests. And when everyone will fight for their own personal interests and will be involved in it, what will happen to them? That in the human environment, every time there will be a chaos and tension. So if we have to settle all this down, then what is important for that is definitely a contract that is much more needed. And what is the need for this is that if we have to convert the society, then it will be necessary that we spend our lives with a community where their limits are limited. Their limitations are clearly mentioned, their responsibilities are mentioned, so they can spend their lives together. So it is a mutual social contract where the subject standard their rights and powers to one sovereign monarch who is in return was bound to protect its messes from any external danger along with internal chaos. So in other words, we can say that his social order, social contract was of each all and all villages. The philosophy of Khov's is that the Mohdah, the Mohdah-e-Imrani, as it is said, is that for each one of them, their limitations, their boundaries have to be determined. And what will be the basic point is that the ruler will protect his people's rights. And the responsibility of the people will be to follow the rules given by the rulers when they have surrendered to their rulers so that a NOSMOSUP can be established within the society and can be avoided by any kind of chaos.