 Coming up on DTNS, why Colonial Pipeline paid the $4.4 million ransom to Darkside, the scoop on Atlanta's Godfather of Tech, and why you might just want to digitally record your loved ones right now. This is the Daily Tech News for Wednesday, May 19th, 2021 in Los Angeles. I'm Tom Merritt. And from Studio Redwood, I'm Sarah Lane. In Salt Lake City, I'm Scott Johnson. And I'm the show's producer, Roger Chang. We were just talking about electricity. We were having an electric conversation about Sarah's Generator on Good Day Internet. If you want that wider conversation to become a member, patreon.com slash DTNS, let's start with a few tech things you should know. Google's experimenting with a follow button in its Chrome browser that acts like an RS reader of sorts for websites. So if a user follows or subscribes to a website that uses RSS, new content from that publisher will appear in the new tab page as part of a following category that includes cover images, headlines, publishing time stamps, etc. Chrome already has a for you feature, which is topic based, but a follow lets a user actively choose which sites they want to see. Although no word on when this experiment might become a standard Chrome feature. Oh, and then they could let you categorize them by topics. And then they got Google reader back. Friends, it won't be long now. So say your goodbyes because Microsoft will officially retire Internet Explorer on June 15th, 2022. You've got just more than a year on on that day. I said I wouldn't do this. IE will go out of support gone gone. Unless you're a customer of the long-term servicing channel, you'll start to notice it slipping away this year on August 17th when IE will no longer be supported for online services like Office 365 and OneDrive. So prepare yourselves. But remember, a little part of IE will continue to live on in IE mode in Microsoft Edge. India wrote a letter to WhatsApp asking it to withdraw its newly rolled out privacy policy, which according to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, or METI, violates several laws and rules. METI gave WhatsApp seven days to respond and it added that if the response from WhatsApp was not satisfactory, the government could take lawful actions against both WhatsApp and parent company Facebook. I guess if they didn't want to dispute it, they could just say hi, METI. Yep. Wow. Qualcomm announced the new Snapdragon 778G5G mobile chip featuring a Cryo 670 CPU and an Adreno 642L GPU with Qualcomm claiming it gets 40% better CPU performance and 40% faster graphics rendering compared to the previous gen, supporting sub six gigahertz and millimeter wave 5G. Thanks to its Snapdragon X53 5G modem, the new chip will be used by a large number of smartphone makers. You're going to find it in phones from Motorola, Oppo, Realme, Xiaomi, Honor and more. EFA Berlin is canceled for 2021 with the organizer citing the emergency of COVID-19 variants and concerns around the speed and consistency from which vaccines have been rolled out globally as the main causes. The event was initially planned for September 3rd at the Mesa Berlin Convention Center, which continues to be used as an emergency medical facility in a vaccination center. All right. Let's talk about that colonial pipeline ransomware. They have admitted that, yes, they did pay the ransom almost immediately. The Wall Street Journal talked to the CEO of colonial pipeline, Joseph Blunt, who, by the way, says, we liked no one knowing who we were back then. He says that at one point in the article, which I found rather sad. But Blunt was talking to Wall Street Journal about why the company authorized the payment of 4.4 million. You've heard it described as five, but if you're rounding it would just be four, 4.4 million to attempt to resolve the ransomware that infected its business systems. The ransom notice was first discovered at 5.30 a.m. May 7th on a control room computer, which caused some concern. It wasn't in the control system, but it was on one of the business system computers in the control room. And Blunt became aware of it within a half hour. Everybody got on the phone, started calling everybody else. He was six in the morning. He wasn't even at work yet. And he got the call. So they shut the pipeline down as a precaution. They sent out about 300 employees to start inspecting the pipeline, to augment the sensors they already had just to take an extra look. And other employees were advised not to log into the corporate network. The FBI and the CISA here in the US were notified. The company did not know how extensive the breach was or how long it would take to come back online without paying. Now, standard recommendations from security professionals, including the US FBI, is not to pay because that supports the criminals and encourages more attacks. Blunt says he consulted with his own set of experts who he says are experts on dark side itself. And the organization believed it was best to go ahead and pay. He did not say who those experts were, though. Blunt did tell the Wall Street Journal, quote, I know that's a highly controversial decision. I didn't make it lightly. I will admit that I wasn't comfortable seeing money go out the door to people like this, but it was the right thing to do for the country. At least it felt that way at the time, I guess, because a payment was made in Bitcoin on May 7th, and Colonial received a decryption tool to unlock any systems encrypted by the malware. However, the tool only worked in part and did not fully restore systems. In fact, it still hasn't fully restored systems. They turned the pipeline back up because they felt comfortable that it wasn't going to spread anymore, but the billing system still is not working according to Blunt. There was a lot of scuddle bit out there that maybe they were keeping the pipeline shut down because the billing system was down and they didn't want to send fuel with that, the billing system being down, but the billing system is still down and they have turned it back on. Colonial estimates full restoration of all of its IT systems will take months and cost them tens of millions of dollars. So I guess one wonders if it was worth the 4.4 million at all when it's going to take that long and that much work, but maybe it's sped it along enough that they feel like it was worth it. I don't know. Yeah, what an intense thing. I mean, the entire finding out that they went ahead and just paid that was a little bit of a shock to me because I've never really met even individuals who paid off ransomware. And I know plenty of people who were hitting that way, but none of them that I know have paid. They found other ways around or they got IT involved or whatever they had to do to do what they had to do. But I guess I understand his position. I just, I just blew me away. Like, I guess I'm not really judging it one direction or the other. I just, I was a little bit aghast that they just said, okay, here you go. Also treating that as if it's a transaction between a customer and a provider of some sort is an odd thing too. Like you said, not everything's back up. It didn't only worked in part there into the deal, but we're dealing with people who's her holding you hostage. Like, what do we expect that meant on our pillow? Like, I don't know that whole thing is just, it feels like there's a movie under there somewhere and we're probably going to get it one day and that'll be interesting. So I feel the same way, Scott. It's, you know, you think to yourself, okay, well blunt and the colonial pipeline company is like, okay, we got to scramble here. How bad is this? And is it going to get a lot worse if we don't play ball, you know, with the people who are asking for, for this money? And so I understand the decision, but you have to assume it's like, we're just going to hope that they give us back some power that they've since, you know, that they're holding an hostage and you don't know them. This is criminal activity. There is no reason at all to believe that everything goes back to normal if you can just cough up these millions of dollars and turns out that, yeah, I mean, they're back on track somewhat, but there's still a lot of work to be done and they didn't get the system back as it was previously. So this whole thing is like, sure, pay the ransom if you really feel like you have no other choice, but what a mess. I mean, that's the way people are going to think about it now. If you are Darkside, which Darkside runs a very professional service oriented ransomware business, they prided themselves, Scott, in providing good customers. You were joking, joking, but that was Darkside's thing was like, yeah, we'll have a chat open to help you restore your stuff. This is a bad thing for people who do ransomware. Ransomware people don't want you to pay and then their stuff keeps getting locked up because that will further the narrative of don't pay them. What ransomware people want, especially sophisticated organizations like Darkside, is you pay and then everything is solved and it goes away and you don't pay any more attention. Colonial pipeline doesn't get shut down and the news goes away. So it's actually against the ransomware operator's interests for it not to work because now the story is what Sarah was saying, which is like, why would you pay the ransom? It's not even going to work anyway. Look what happened to Colonial Pipeline and that's bad for the ransomware folks. I suppose it's good in general for criminal activity to be reduced potentially. We'll see. That's so skevy. Everything that you just said is just like, you're right. You're 100% right about all of it and I'm glad they're running a ship shaped deal over there, but you know what I mean? Like, I don't know. It's so weird. Researchers from blockchain analysis firm Elliptic estimated that the Darkside ransomware gang has made more than $90 million from ransomware payments from its victims since October 2020. Average payment was around 1.9 million. So the 4.4 million was quite high. The researchers examined the Bitcoin wall is used by Darkside to receive ransom payments from victims over the past nine months and determine how ransom money got cashed out. Of course, those accounts have now been drained. So Darkside doesn't have any of that money now. Well, they don't call them Darkside for nothing. He's also a really great villain in the DC universe. Anyway, moving on, speaking of DC owned by Warner Brothers and HBO, let's talk about them. Warner media announced that an ad supported version of HBO Max will launch in the first week of June for $9.99 a month. Ads will not run against HBO original programming though. Only Max originals and other content. Still have some questions about that. We'll get to that in a second. The cheaper ad supported version won't get the day in date movie releases that HBO Max gets for $14.99 a month, what you're all getting now if you're buying the service. But all the same content will still be there. Even at $9.99 a month, HBO Max is more expensive than similar ad supported offerings from Hulu, Paramount Plus and others, which cost $5.99 cents or Peacock, which is either free or $4.99 with ads. I guess that's without ads, right? That takes ads out the $4.99, I would assume. Anyway, not super. No, $4.99 with ads. You pay $9.99 for no ads on Peacock. So there's a free Peacock that's limited content with ads, $4.99 all the content with ads, and then $9.99 no ads. All right, well, Peacock and I haven't been very good friends. But anyway, the point is back to this whole day in date thing and well, mostly about the way that the commercials are going to work. I was saying pre-show that I don't like the idea of content that was constructed to not have natural commercial breaks are going to be super annoying in this way. And I still feel that way about some of these max originals because some of those are also not formatted to have natural breaking points like you would commercial TV. They are formatted for breaks. Some aren't though. I've seen stuff like, I don't know. I've definitely like the flight attendant definitely like stopped down for a quick pause and came right back. You'd almost not notice it, but I'm like, oh, that's where an ad break will go. I guess I have to do that for two reasons. One is they probably knew this was coming, but also they want to be able to take those max originals and Aram on TNT and Turner, which they announced they're going to do. They're going to take a bunch of those max originals and Aram on broadcast TV. So I think they all have them in there. You just may not have noticed it. Maybe I didn't notice and maybe that's to their credit. Like what raised by Wolves was one that I thought didn't seem like it had very good breaks. But anyway, it is still a premium compared to other services. And I think that's just kind of our expectation for HBO. You know, they, I think they know that people will pay for a premium cable, you know, high end content sort of experience and they're probably right. I mean, I'm already paying 15 and probably will still. So yeah, but I think that there are, there are the people who say 15. What? I mean, Peacock is, you know, 499 for ads. So 999 little psychological there, but that makes a lot more sense. And if you are used to ads, if you're subscribed to Hulu, for example, and you're not the end of the world, I mean, a lot of people do that with, with podcasts as well with all sorts of content. It's like you, you feel like you're saving a lot if you really want that content and you get the benefit of HBO original programming is exempt and I don't know. I, I know that the, the conversation is always like, well, how much is too much? You know, at what point does HBO Max or any of these services turn the consumer off? Well, make the consumer turn them off by, by, you know, keeping the price point just slightly too high. And I don't think anyone totally knows what the sweet spot is. I know that Disney Plus is always, it's kind of the barometer because it's like, well, Disney Plus, this is doing pretty well. I know they missed their numbers slightly in the last earnings report, but you know, pretty, pretty, pretty a great success out of the gate. And obviously that has a lot to do with the content that's on Disney Plus, but something like HBO can get away with a little bit more because it's the cachet of, you know, HBO, you know, exclusive movies and really hot TV shows you can't find anywhere else. Yeah. If you're out there saying like, well, I would never pay $9.99 a month for something with ads, then that's fine. You won't. That's not the same thing as saying no one will and this is not going to be successful. Everyone thought $14.99 a month was too much for HBO Max compared to $7.99 for a no ads version of Disney Plus, which I think was $6.99 when HBO Max launched. But HBO alone was $14.99 a month, even with your cable package in a lot of cases, which is why they had to price it at $14.99. So if you're wanting to keep HBO Max, but you can't afford $15 a month, you might be able to afford $10 a month. And we'll see how many people do that or they might not care. Jason Collar was saying in the announcement of this, he's like, we make the same amount of money whether there's an ad supported subscriber or a non ad supported subscriber. So they don't care. They just want to be able to expand that tent to people who are like, I don't have 15, but I might be able to swing 10 because I really want to watch that content. That's what they're banking on. Well, we are very happy to have Nika Monford from Snap OS back with us for another edition of Teching While Black where she highlights innovative voices in the black community. Take it away, Nika. Hi, this is Nika Monford, AKA tech savvy diva of the Snap OS show. In the Teching While Black segment, I will bring awareness to a black technology leader who is advancing the tech community through their innovations across the spectrum of industries. Today in Teching While Black, let's highlight Atlanta's godfather of tech, Dr. Paul Judge, entrepreneur, investor, inventor. As an entrepreneur, he is the co-founder and partner of Tech Square Labs, co-founder and executive chairman of Pin Drop, partner of AC3, Atlanta's hip hop centric music festival and partner of Judge Ventures. As an investor between both Tech Square Labs and Judge Ventures, Paul has invested in over 60 technology startups. Let's say that again, over 60 technology startups. Also, he was either a founder and or CTO of multiple companies, including Luma Home, a now acquired consumer Wi-Fi company, Pure Wire, a now acquired leading web security company and Cypher Trust, a now acquired leader in email security company. As an inventor, he holds approximately 30 patented or patent pending technologies all in the computer security space. Whew, that's a lot. Let me take a quick breather before we go on. Okay, let's keep going. In addition to being an entrepreneur, investor and inventor, he is a noted speaker and scholar, having given talks at events such as platform 2014 and writings in both Tech Crunch and Pando Daily. Most recently, he was a commencement speaker for the Georgia Institute of Technology's class of 2021 ceremony where he is a two-time alumnus holding a master's in network security and a PhD in cybersecurity. Cough, cough, follow Georgia Tech alum here, yellow jackets, stand up. Paul is a fierce advocate of cultivating the tech talent and bridging the gap between founders and inventors in Atlanta, which has been made abundantly clear based on his involvement in the startup culture. All which have earned him the moniker as Atlanta's godfather of tech. To find out more about Paul and his innovative work, be sure to check him out on Twitter at Paul Judge or on his website pjudge.com. History is being made in real time every single day. So let's celebrate it now. When we are aware of all innovative voices, especially those in underrepresented groups, the tech community thrives. Be sure to tune into the next Tech in While Black where we highlight a black tech innovator from around the globe. Thank you, Nika, for introducing us to Dr. Paul Judge. We look forward to next month's segment as well. You can hear Nika every week on snobos at snoboscast.com. Hey, folks, don't forget if you want an ad-free version of DTNS, support us on Patreon. Get your own personal RSS feed supported directly by you. Find out more at dailytechnewshow.com slash Patreon. First, Bitcoin always goes in cycles. So it's always going to have a downturn no matter what happens. Then you get Tesla adding and then polling support for Bitcoin, Elon Musk making jokes about it, and Dogecoin on Saturday Night Live, then implying on Twitter that maybe you'll sell all this Bitcoin on, but maybe not. None of that's going to fuel a surge. However, Tuesday, the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association, and the Payment and Clearing Association of China all issued a warning that consumers would get no protection from losses related to cryptocurrency investment transactions and financial and payment institutions are advised not to use virtual currency for most purposes. You'll see this being called a ban because it's essentially the same as if you're like, you really shouldn't do this because it's, you know, you're not going to get any of our support. And these are major organizations. It's just short of a ban and is effectively going to end up being as if there was a ban. And that's important because about three-quarters of Bitcoin mining happens in China. So if you're mining all that Bitcoin and suddenly you can't use it for anything inside your own country, it doesn't mean you can't make money off it at all, but it makes it more difficult. Wednesday, the price of Bitcoin fell below $34,000 for the first time in three months. Other currencies like Ethereum, Dogecoin, and more dropped as well. And CoinMarketCap estimates the entire crypto market shrank by 20% between Tuesday and Wednesday. Now, it has come back since then to be a more, well, it was 17% earlier. It's 19% at recording. This is why we don't like covering these kinds of things because it changes from minute to minute, but it's a big drop. And we normally wouldn't cover these kind of fluctuations except that everybody was talking about this, I guess because it was so high and it had been starting to get more attention. Well, my welcome to a new segment called Scott's Uninformed Commentary on Bitcoin. But I'm gonna make a statement here that maybe, I don't know if it's controversial or not. We are to the point as you illustrated well that Bitcoin is no longer just a weird side thing that we can sort of ignore, but also it's interesting and fun to pay attention to, but now it's like a bigger part of the bigger financial discussion and it will probably continue to be so. As a result, when people like Elon Musk or anybody else heavily invested in that world says anything, these fluctuations seem to just come crashing up or down whatever direction. So the minute somebody says, ah, yeah, Bitcoin's awesome. And they're in a position of serious influence. The whole world goes burnt and it happens so quickly and so fast and those fluctuations happen so fast that you're just kind of blindsided by it. I don't know if that's sustainable. So my commentary is this concerns me that if this is truly the future, if cryptocurrency is the future of the financial backbone of the world, then my gosh, we got to figure out a way to make it a little less volatile. If somebody's in a bad mood and leaves a tweet that makes everybody go crap or a company says, we can't take Bitcoin anymore even though we really championed in the beginning and have everybody panic like this. There's that in the regular financial market. There's always panic. There are always buttons that get pushed, but this just feels unsustainable. That's my segment. Yeah, I see a lot of, I am very much an observer. I don't dabble a lot, but I know a lot of people who do. And one of my big takeaways is I am very risk averse. So again, I'm happy on the sidelines for now, for the most part, but I see so many folks saying the tools are easier than ever. It's the future. I want to be part of this wave. It's get rich quick, but it's different. It's not a Ponzi scheme. It's different. This time we're going to have figure it out. And the folks who were left out of stock market and Wall Street and money and banks and all of that stuff, this is a new era. And a lot of that is fluff and some of that is true. And I think that these wide fluctuations are just inevitable when anything is sort of new and exciting and confusing. What I hate are hearing this sort of like, this is going to be the answer for all of the folks who have been held down by the small amount of people who had all of the wealth in the past. And now we have these so much more accessibility and tools to be able to level the playing field. And then you have exchanges that go down for hours, sometimes days at a time, because they can't handle all of the massive traffic, good and bad. And it's such a mess and people do lose real money. I mean, this isn't like, you're not playing a game here. It's all very real. And so the memification of it, if that's even a word, I think it is, is it's troubling to me because it's like, this is only funny to a point. I mean, sure, if you have some money to burn, throw in the garbage, have as much money as you want. But yeah, it's sort of, it's going to be a roller coaster for the foreseeable future. I don't know any other way around it. Don't believe the hype and this will all make much more sense. Everybody out there, this is something where you have to not look at all of the things that Sarah and Scott have been referencing and not that they shouldn't have been referencing them. Those are real things out there, right? But if you ignore all that, ignore all the people saying this is the future, ignore all the people saying this is the end or this is stupid, Bitcoin makes a lot more sense. I look at Bitcoin as like, oh, it's this interesting thing that's sort of finding its feet and figuring out what it's good for. It's probably never going to be a currency. So the criticisms were people like, yeah, but when can I go down to the corner store and buy something with it? I'm like, you never will. You probably never will. That's really not what it's for. It's a store of value. It's a commodity probably. That seems to be where it's going. And what's happening this time is less dramatic than what happened the last time it crashed. Three or four years ago, it went up to 20,000 and everybody thought, oh my gosh, it's hitting the sky and then it crashed back down. Well, way down, like more like four or 5,000. So this is just another cycle and it's honestly a little bit of a less dramatic cycle with a lot more tension and hype around it than the last crash. From where I sit, I look at this as like, oh, Bitcoin's growing up, Bitcoin's maturing. Not there yet, but it's starting to learn how to ride a wave instead of just go sky high and then crash. So I actually am weirdly made optimistic by this. I'm 100% with you, Sarah, that this is not something for people to play around with. This is not a way for you to get rich quick easily. You might look into it, but this is not a safe thing to toy around with unless you've got money to lose. I agree with you about the hype thing real quick. Do you think it's possible that the reason it feels a little more intense this time, even though it's less losses is because there's more people who have a stake now than there were four years ago because it does feel like that's true. Not a stake. I would say not a stake because it doesn't feel more intense to me. I'd say the intensity comes from more coverage. I get you. All right. When two people are talking about something, it's interesting. When three people are talking, it's a lot of people talking. When four people are talking, it's a trend, but it only has to be four people. So, you know, we got a lot more people talking about it. That's that's where I sit. Well, talking about a whole different thing. Addressa Simmons has an article out on Wired called the mother or excuse me, my mother is gone, but her digital voice helps keep me well. Three years ago, a few months before her mother died of colon cancer, she recorded a conversation between her mother and aunt during lockdown this last year. She started using the recordings as her alarm sound and for things throughout the day. So different tasks or whatever. Simmons notes that a 2020 study published in plus one found that melodic sounds made people more alert after waking to an alarm. She's taken to using other recordings as alarms, including singing happy birthday to her nieces and recordings of her children talking to each other and so on. I think this is so cool and it makes me happy that I've got audio ranging from when I was two and my dad recorded me on an old tape recorder to me recording my kids when they were little and pretty soon here doing an interview with my 82 year old mother. The therapeutic effects of that weren't necessarily known, but this seems like a very interesting look at that side of it. And also I know more than a couple people who have had loved ones that have died or for some other reason they can't talk to anymore and they will go back to voicemails and just listen to them and I go, I can't even believe you saved it. Well, you know, I did and this is something that I returned to for comfort, but that's sort of a different context, right? You go and you kind of listen to whatever it was that the voicemail was about, but I get it. And I actually frankly wish I had a lot more of those for some people in my life as well, but I do have old recordings and I actually use audio cues for certain alarms that I set for myself during the day with Amazon's assistant. She sometimes says things to me, you know, and it's she's telling me to do something or to remember to do something. And if I could actually customize it that much more to hear a voice that would fill me with joy or soothe me or otherwise just, I don't know, be kind of weird yet positive. I would totally do that. Yeah, I'm pretty jealous of people now because most of my older family is gone. My mom's still alive, but otherwise it's all brothers, sisters, cousins. aunts and uncles are almost all gone except for one. So there's not a chance for me to do this. I have a cassette recording of my dad doing a talk on evaporated milk, not the most personal situation, but even just digitizing that and listening to it a couple of years ago, I was like, oh man, it's just so great to hear his voice again. So yeah, I think this is fantastic as far as like, hey, take advantage of this and think about what you can use it for. And I thought it was fascinating that she was using it as an alarm to promote her own wellness where she was trying to remind herself to eat better and exercise and things like that and having her mom's voice being the thing that was the alarm. But when the alarm went off, it was a positive for her. Yeah, it's a good trigger. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. And not to get all forecasty here, but it feels like there's a future where we can take some of this accumulated content audio in this case of family members and replace our digital assistants with modulated versions of the way that they spoke. And it may be, some may find that creepy, I don't know. Like the photos you saw on heritage.com recently where a past away relative would come to life again and their eyes would move and they would smile and kind of be in a little bit of a pseudo 3D. There's a lot of comfort for a lot of people in that sort of thing. So if we can also find that there's, you know, therapeutic reasons why this is helpful, I could see a future where we get to choose who talks to us and maybe it's my mom and not some random lady at Amazon. It should be okay. Hey, mom, it turns on your smart speaker. All right, let's check out the mail bag, Sarah. What do we got in there today? We got an email from Christos. This is a conversation we had a few days ago with Jen Cutter about replacing captures and the idea that physical key was something that Cloudflare was looking into. Christos says, as a totally blind user, since the mid-80s, captures have always been a problem for screen reader software. Yes, it would be a great day. The day that they were are replaced were better yet killed off. I get why they exist. Yes, there are audio solutions for entering captures. However, these have a high failure rate since you can usually only play the audio version once and many of them were created with a light background noise value which wakes them non-usable. Yeah, I think captures may have been a necessary evil at one point, but hopefully we're getting to a situation where they aren't as necessary and they don't have to be evil. That'd be great. Yeah, and thank you, Christos, by the way. It's always great to hear from somebody who's like, this is a situation that I have with captures and I look forward to a better solution. So it makes a lot of sense. If you have feedback for us, you have anecdotes, you have questions, you have comments, feedback at dailytechnewshow.com is where to send that email. Shout out to patrons at our master and grandmaster levels. Today, they include John and Becky Johnston, Chris Benito, and Dan Colback. Also, thank you to our brand new boss. You know who you are, but we're going to call you out anyway. Matt McConnell just started backing us on Patreon. So thank you, Matt. You're already a very excellent boss. I don't know how you do it. Thank you. Yeah, we know we need more mats in this world. We do. Yeah, mats are great. Thanks to Scott Johnson also, also great. Can't forget the Scots out there. Scott, what's been going on with you? Well, I'm going to put that on my gravestone. Also great. I'll put on there. Hey, let me let me see if I can capture your attention by sending you over to my website frogpants.com has everything you might want in the form of podcasts and art and comics and other cool stuff. If you are into that sort of thing, then by gum, you're going to have a great time over there. So go check it out. That's frogpants.com and you can also chat with me on Twitter. I'm over there at Scott Johnson. Excellent. We are live on this show Monday through Friday 4 30 p.m. Eastern 20 30 UTC. Do check us out live. If you can more info at daily tech new show dot com slash live and we're back at it tomorrow. The Justin Robert Young talk to them. This show is part of the frog pants network. Get more at frogpants.com. I hope you have enjoyed this program.