 So, I discovered Bitcoin about, I think we were 2011, and that's when I was from a fellow nerd friend of mine who introduced me to it and said, Stu, do you want to take a look at this? What I liked about Bitcoin was the trustless nature of things, and also the community. The community of these wild, sort of like, you know, wild west sort of people, you know, I resonated quite deeply with that. That was the main sort of thing that I really liked about Bitcoin. I didn't really see any flaws at that time. It wasn't, but now I can see that it's, I think the initial drive for Bitcoin was to create a sort of democratic system. What I liked about Bitcoin, ideally, was that it was an alternative way for money to flow into the hands of people, unlike today's banking system, where money sort of like inflated, it goes in by the banking system, and it sort of percolates out there, and then from there it's sort of leveraged in all sorts of debt, vehicles and, you know, like, well, I think, was it 98% of the money that's in circulation now is derived from debt. And just through the passage of time, interest is incurred on the principle. So there's not enough money, not enough currency in the system to pay back the principle along with the interest associated with it. So, you know, pretty much almost any other system is better than that. Discovering Ethereum was about 2013, it wasn't 2014. I was part of the initial ICO in the beginning. I bought some like 2000 Ethereum tokens at the time, but unfortunately I was in Israel at the time, and as I was doing my password, Hamas started to bomb us, you know, in Tel Aviv. They've got this sort of iron dome sort of missile protective, you know, as soon as a foreign body sort of comes in, you know, the radars triangulate on this and then launch bombs. I mean, missiles to intercept these bombs. So my wife or girlfriend at the time, we sort of ran down into the bomb shelter downstairs. I was completely stark as naked. And ever since then, I've been trying to figure out that password. I thought it was something technologically interesting. I like programming languages and compilers, and I thought it was a really, really interesting idea, putting, you know, a touring complete language on the blockchain. But I'd also sort of become more familiar with Meredith Patterson's work on language security. I think maybe about that same time. And a lot of questions sort of, you know, getting flagged. And this is when I started doing looking at the code base. And I saw the code base was not good. I was quite unhappy with the quality of the code. And that's when I was like, well, all right, I won't be investing in Ethereum based on that fact. I tend to look at the code. So coming into the Ethereum classic community, I was into the Rust programming language. And I'd been working on my project Fractalite, and my wife sort of, you know, put the fist on the table and said, husband, you need to go and get a job. And I saw there was a, Igor had posted a job posting. And she said, look at this. You need to go for this. So I applied for that. And I got it. And I was like, hey, this is Ethereum classic. What's the history behind this? I resonated with it. And I found, as I got into it, I found the community to be a lot more robust, a lot more interesting and diverse. And you know, there's like solid people in here. So that's what sort of stuck me to it. After looking at this community and sort of actually going through that investment thesis that Matt wrote up, he illustrated four different points. You know, there's the initial adoption stage, then there's the miners come on, and then the third stage is when developers start to come on. And I saw that. I thought, actually, this is a pretty good trajectory trajectory to follow. Let's get in there first. Let's be one of the first people that there's risk associated with it. But you know, maybe that maybe it could work out because there's, it's a very diverse community. It's just not, it's not just your hackers and nerds. You've got all sorts of people in there. So I thought there might be a critical mass to be able to support this sort of thing. Anyway, I already spent two and a half years working on this project with the intention of actually implementing my own cryptocurrency with Fractalite. And having had the experience of back in 2001, I know how difficult it is to build a community around one of these things. So I'd already become sort of well known within the Ethereum classic community. I thought, well, why not just sort of join forces with this sort of, with this community and that way I don't need to build a large community associated with it. From a very high level perspective, Fractalite is trying to solve, well, the problem of moving cryptocurrency from a speculative currency to a utilitarian currency in the sense that now we start to attract people with real skills into a community. And they are able to produce intellectual property and they're able to charge money for it if they so wish. And then from there, they're actually solving problems within industry. So instead of a cryptocurrency, which is sort of sitting there making big promises and you get a bunch of speculators coming in there, you're actually getting people coming in there who have existing clients, who have problems associated with industry, whether it be health care, any sort of thing that requires convenient and cheap and quick payment mechanisms. The main sort of target of Fractalite, this is still a touchy-feely thing at the moment, I'm still exploring it. As mentioned in my talk yesterday, there are sort of different ways human beings organize their organizations. One particular sort of group of people are those people that are already involved in cryptocurrency. They have already, maybe they might have small teams, maybe they're creating products themselves, but essentially you're looking at a certain group of people that have, well, you could say, the power of a bank in their back pocket. This enables a whole different, it's a different ball game. So how does one sort of create an infrastructure for these people so that they're able to specialize in a particular component or solving a particular problem and then allowing each of these entities to communicate information with each other? So you can see a marketplace as just a set of nodes and edges where the edges are the trading, they're trading money and goods. How does one sort of break that up even more to the point where you can have these individuals who are wielding the power of a bank, an entire bank in their pockets, such that they're able to compose entities which solve one specific problem and that becomes their niche. And yet at the same time, that particular problem or the solution that they've got for that problem composes with everything else in the network. So it's sort of shifting, well, just because of the nature of how we architect the software using this flow-based programming concept, we'll be able to bring together a community at large but yet retain these sort of nucleus teams. Fractalite would probably be best solving problems in the sense that where you have domain experts, domain experts who might be scientists, mathematicians, engineers who aren't familiar with programming languages. So what Fractalite does is it sort of separates concerns. So you can have your programmers who revel in programming languages and they can write highly optimized, complicated components which do one thing. But that wraps up into a nice component when on the graph level you'd have your domain experts. And domain experts on the graph level is just basically nodes and edges. And you sort of plug nodes together, much like Lego, you could say. So I would say from that perspective domain experts would prefer to be on the graph level. And many other programming languages don't have this abstraction level. So in that sense you're actually reducing the bar for the normal person, the domain expert to enter this domain and actually have control over how they want their application to be constructed. And I think that's quite suitable for the cryptocurrency community because you've got a subset of programmers but there's also a large amount of people who would like to create different applications but might not necessarily have the technical know how to do that. So this is where I see the main body of users coming in. So what I would dearly like to see is an environment, okay, say three to five years from now, a large amount of programmers would be already on the system, have created a large amount of agents which are solving problems and they're completely reusable, reusable and reproducible. So other programmers would come on and say, well, I've got clients that I need to make happy and I see there's a whole toolbox of agents ready to go. I don't have to write those things. They've already been debugged and used in industry as it is. So they just pull them in and use them. But also supporting a lot more cryptocurrencies. So you'd have all sorts of different cryptocurrencies that each of these agents could plug into.