 Dawkins won't debate me. Of course not. Why should he? Why should anybody? Nobody should be debating you because you flatly said in the last attempt at a debate we had that you don't care about debate and you don't care about proof. And in this discussion, your entire position is predicated on an assertion that there is a God who is a judge of the world. And then let's take a look and see if the Bible makes sense if we begin with that presupposition. But you can't look at it. You will not. You refuse to look at it as if we don't begin with that presupposition, you've provided zero evidence. All you've done is make one assertion after another after another, right out to telling me I'm wrong about what atheism is.