 The U.S. could have prevented this war just by protecting Kyiv from Nazis. As we hide replaying toward the brink of nuclear armageddon, while Bono and the Edge play you two songs in Kyiv, it's probably worth taking a moment to highlight the fact that this entire war could have been avoided, if the U.S. had simply pledged military protection for Zelensky against the far-right extremists who were threatening to lynch him, if he enacted the peacemaking policies he was elected to enact. To be clear, what we are indulging in here is entirely an act of fantasy. In imagining what would have happened if the U.S. had pledged to protect the Ukrainian government from an undemocratic, violent overthrow at the hands of fascists instead of waging a horrific proxy war, we are imagining a world in which the U.S. government acts in the highest interests of all, instead of working continuously to dominate the planet, no matter how much madness and cruelty it needs to inflict upon humanity. A world in which the U.S. hadn't been taking steps toward the orchestration of this proxy war for many years. With that out of the way, it's just a simple fact that for a fraction of the military firepower the U.S. is pouring into Ukraine right now, it could have prevented the entire war by simply protecting Ukrainian democracy from the undemocratic impulses of the worst people in that country. When he was asked by the nation's Katrina Vandenhove last month what he thinks is preventing Kiev from signing a peace agreement with Russia, John Mirsheimer, whose analysis of this conflict has been prophetic for many years, replied as follows, I think that when Zelensky ran for president, he made it very clear that he wanted to work out an arrangement with Russia that ended the crisis in Ukraine, and he won. And what he then tried to do was move toward implementing the Minsk-2 agreement. If you were going to shut down the conflict in Ukraine, you had to implement Minsk-2. And Minsk-2 meant giving the Russian-speaking and ethnic Russian population in the eastern most part of Ukraine, the Donbass region, a significant amount of autonomy. And you had to make the Russian language an official language of Ukraine. I think Zelensky found out very quickly that because of the Ukrainian right, it was impossible to implement Minsk-2. Therefore, even though the French and the Germans, and of course the Russians, were very interested in making Minsk-2 work, because they wanted to shut down the crisis, they couldn't do it. In other words, the Ukrainian right was able to stymie Zelensky on that front, end quote. When Mirsheimer says that the Ukrainian right was able to stymie Zelensky, he doesn't mean by votes or by democratic processes. He means by threats and by violence. In an article last month, titled Siding with Ukraine's Far Right, U.S. Sabotage Zelensky's Mandate for Peace, journalist Aaron Mate wrote the following, quote. In April 2019, Zelensky was elected with an overwhelming 73% of the vote on a promise to turn the tide. In his inaugural address the next month, Zelensky declared that he was not afraid to lose my own popularity, my ratings, and was prepared to give up my own position as long as peace arrives. But Ukraine's powerful Far Right and neo-Nazi militias made clear to Zelensky that reaching peace in the Donbas would have a much higher cost. No, he would lose his life, right sector co-founder Dmitriy Anatolyevich Yarosh, then the commander of the Ukrainian Volunteer Army responded one week after Zelensky's inaugural speech. He will hang on some tree and crechetic if he betrays Ukraine and those people who died in the Revolution and the war, end quote. In a 2019 interview with Mate, the late great scholar Stephen Cohen made the following comments, quote. But ultimately you have a situation now which seems not to be widely understood that the new president of Ukraine Zelensky ran as a peace candidate. That's a bit of a stretch and maybe it doesn't mean a whole lot to your generation, but he ran a kind of George McGovern campaign. The difference was McGovern got wiped out and Zelensky won by, I think, 71, 72%. He won an enormous mandate to make peace. So that means he has to negotiate with Vladimir Putin. And there are various formats, right? There's a so-called Minsk format which involves the German and the French. There's a bilateral directly with Putin. But his willingness, and this is what's important and not well reported here, his willingness to deal directly with Putin, which his predecessor Poroshenko was not or couldn't for whatever reason, actually required considerable boldness on Zelensky's part because there are opponents of this in Ukraine and they are armed. Some say they are fascists, but they are certainly ultra-nationalists and they have said that they will remove and kill Zelensky if he continues along this line of negotiating with Putin. Zelensky cannot go forward as I've explained. I mean, his life is being threatened literally by a quasi-fascist movement in Ukraine. He can't go forward with full peace negotiations with Russia, with Putin, unless America has his back. Maybe that won't be enough, but unless the White House encourages this diplomacy, Zelensky has no chance of negotiating an end to the war, so the stakes are enormously high. In an article titled Why Russia Went to War Now, anti-warist Ted Snyder explains that Putin likely made the decision to invade because Kiev wasn't respecting Minsk too and because further NATO membership with Ukraine was being kept on the table while weapons poured into the country from the US. Zelensky wouldn't talk to the leaders of the Donbass. Minsk was dead and Russia feared an imminent operation against the ethnic Russian population of the Donbass, Snyder writes. At the same time, Washington had become a leaky faucet on promises of flooding Ukraine with weapons and opened doors to NATO to red lines Putin had clearly drawn. But again, Zelensky couldn't enact Minsk because it had been made absolutely clear to him that he faced a horrific death by fascist Lynch mob if he did. If the choice is between taking a chance on a US proxy war and getting Gaddafi'd in the public square, I think many people around the world would opt for the former. So Zelensky made peace with the Nazis, whose will for Ukraine aligned with Washington's. But what this means is that every major factor which led to Russia's decision to invade could have been nullified by the US government. A guarantee of no NATO membership for Ukraine could have been made. The weapons supplies could have been stopped and Zelensky and his government could have received protection from the US military against the armed fascists who would repeat their violent acts of 2014 upon them. It would have been wins all around. We wouldn't be staring down the barrel of nuclear Armageddon. Ukraine would have been spared the horrors of an insane proxy war. Western powers wouldn't be sending arms to literal Nazi factions. And the US would actually be protecting Ukrainian democracy instead of just pretending to. But again, we are only indulging in fantasy here. Fighting Nazis, protecting democracy and waging peace are not things the US Empire actually does in real life. The US is the most tyrannical and murderous regime on Earth by a truly massive margin and it will happily risk the life of everyone on Earth if it means securing planetary rule. But sometimes it's nice to imagine the kind of world we might be living in if we were not ruled by psychopaths.