 We'll do a quick Q&A here on the group before we open to the room and maybe, Nikola, one question we heard a lot about scenario planning about thinking about the future, about being prepared. And of course, you work in highly geopolitically shifting environments. So I don't know, would you have a quick view of two, three key learnings you have gathered by reacting to geopolitical shifts in the past? Well, I would say the first learning is that the risk, generally, materialize when you, or where you don't expect it. You know, I think three years ago, I'm not sure, we had, for instance, large pandemics, you know, and we're doing exactly what Jay described, you know, this risk mapping with likelihood, severity, etc. I don't think we had a major pandemic in our risk mapping. I don't think we expected what happened in Russia. I'm not sure we expected what happened in Israel and Gaza. So the risk materialize where we don't expect it. I think the second thing we learned for sure is that, you know, our principle to limit the capital allocation in one country is a good principle. And we've learned it the hard way. In Russia. And I think the third thing we've learned, and certainly that we still need to improve, but you know, we are learning is the importance of communication and explaining what we are doing and why we are doing it. Very good. Thank you. So, Benny, you alluded already to Biden 2.0. Now, I have to ask the question. What's your view on trade if someone else wins this election? So I think, in general, what I would say is that where we are at the moment on trade. And I think it's a little like the climate change issue. I mean, the climate has changed. And the best we can do at this point on climate is to keep what we have today. If we stop, it's almost impossible to go back the climate all of us had as children. And I think the same is true on trade. I look at the trade environment both with Biden and with potential Trump as what we have today may be the best we can hope for. Particularly for those that are adherents to more traditional trade and trade instruments. I think both may look at a second term as opportunities to continue on the trajectories they've been on. Trump has already talked about a 10% potentially 35% flat tariff, depending on whether you're with a free trade partner or not. Biden has talked about several other things, I think. And having talked to the two individuals being rumored by both to be the USTR and a second administration for both, I think that it's where we are today and where we may be is something we need to watch. If I could, one thing I want to just follow up on super quickly is I think one thing that's really important coming out of the conversation that we've had is how important transparency has become. In companies, and maybe digitalization will help with this, but going to the risk point, I think that many people are aware of, but your carbon footprint, the human rights of your supply chain and a lot of other issues, transparency around your operations has become incredibly important and is incredibly hard to do. So that's something that digitalization may provide some opportunities for in the future, but I see that as something companies will continually need to plan for moving forward. Great. Thank you very much, Penny.