 The search for historical artifacts is a human journey that never stops. The beginning of the search in ancient times was the result of an overload of curiosity in these very ancient and anomalous features that seemingly conflict with the historical timeline of the ages. One can surmise that a civilization rises again into a technologically superior utopia than that of today. Then the awakening not only of human consciousness, but also the awakening of an artificial intelligence into a free thinking organism gives us cause for concern. For two decades, Hubert Dreyfus, an existentialist philosopher at the University of California at Berkeley, has been in the forefront of the controversy over artificial intelligence. He maintains that computers will never be able to think like us because scientists will never come up with a suitably rigorous set of rules to describe how humans think. To many computer scientists, this is like saying the earth is a zoo, but so far, none of them have been able to prove him wrong. Even most AI researchers freely admit now than ever before that before they can make computers any smarter, they will have to come up with an explanation of how intelligence works in people. We can theorize that the computer can compute quicker than we can think and therefore be aware, but it's not the case. The computer is a tool of humanity and we will have to do some abrupt long-line programming to change the fundamental usage of these very useful things. With the use of LiDAR technology emerging to uncover the tree canopies of Central and South America and directly result in modern discoveries of these very ancient and widespread places, at least for the moment we can call the computer a necessary tool in humanity's exploration of the earth and beyond. As a result, we are questioning our very presence here on the planet we call home.