 Perhaps when I was in E.D., I didn't realize it until I came out of E.D. How inward-looking we are. Somehow we feel that we are all true donors. We continue to support us. It doesn't matter what we do. I think E.D. scientists have to go beyond the inward-looking posture to communicate engaging, best-mind all over the world, collaborate much more aggressively. Otherwise, down the road, I can see that no matter how many celebrations you have, you will have problems with garnering funds. Second, what I noticed that last five, six years, it is not hitting any headline in the United States. Well, five years back or ten years back, E.D.'s news was a major news here. Was it, of course, New York Times? I don't see any breakthroughs coming out which is hitting headlines. It's no criticism of E.D. It's my fear that we need to generate a lot more relevant knowledge and technology and communicate with the U.S. and other industrial nations so they feel excited to be supportive of E.D. I could see that your strategic plan with the communications is a very good one, but be sure that U.S. has an important audience that you consider. I think Bob will do that. Bob Ziegler will do that. I somehow felt that some of the directors didn't do that. Just ignore the United States and it comes to Europe and Japan. Okay, but you know, U.S. is still a major player in the world economy and U.S. can still be helpful even though they are cutting the budget of their own program so they cannot support our system too much. So communication, making sure that scientists are encouraged. Start with new knowledge and technology which will help the next generation of problems. Take that and communicate with the industrial countries as well as the developing regions. Of course, the primary beneficiary is the developing regions, but don't forget the developed regions are partners and we need to do a better job of communicating with them why we need to support E.D. and other CG centers. So I consider that a big, big challenge because resources are getting shrinking all over the world. So we've got to do a lot more of what I call communication and information exchange and at the same time try to bring in more U.S. scientists, more push-dogs encouraged them to come to E.D. and other CG centers which I think our American representation is not very strong. It's my perspective.