 Νομίζω ότι το καλύτερο είναι να φτιάξουμε την συμφωνία για τις πραγματικές συμφωνές της τεχνολογικής τεχνολογικής στις στις τώρας. Αλλά όχι μόνο που μιλάμε για τις εξαιρετικές τεχνολογικές στις νομίζεις είναι καλύτερα, γιατί βρισκόμαστε ένα σχέδιο που δεν είναι ανοιχημένος, γιατί έχουμε τώρα στις συμφωνές που μπορούν να είναι σημαντικές και σημαντικές για να πρέπει να παίρνουμε αυτοί. Αυτό είναι, πραγματικό, το οποίο έχουν φυσικά κυριακές λόγες, αλλά και κυριακές λογές. Λοιπόν, είναι σημαντικό να ανοιχθούμε κυριακές κυριακές κυριακές. Αυτό πρέπει να είναι σημαντικές κυριακές. Και εδώ έχουμε ένα καλύτερο σύμφωνο. Δεν είναι μόνο όσο οι εξαιρετικές, και να καταλάβουμε εδώ για τα πρώτα φορά που έρθει στην ΙΤΥΥΥΥ. Έχουμε ένα σηφαίρα στο ΗΕΤΥΥΥ. Έχουμε επαγκ两φοι μου να μ & e δηλαδή να το α IPO τόσο από hvad πάνω λόγεςωη양ς, δεν έχ usaναρόχει κάτι να doing με ΗΤΥΥΥ. Έλα,στε νη reallyCom και είναι diagnτικό να κάνουμε. Φυσικά έ tutoring οι εξαιρετικέςών με Taking out the others and this is a good thing to do in my opinion. Βορφιο τέτοιο τύ לנו να ετοπίσουμεeltες was when a proponent of a futurist approach to AI was asked why we should do this. He could not answer. She spoke for five minutes but he could not answer the question. So I don't believe we should do something just because out of geeky it is cool. We should be very cognizant what technologies mean now for our life and be critical. And from the positive perspective there were many critical voices here telling exactly what I'm saying here now, perhaps more diplomatically. But I think it is now time to face directly this attitude which says something we should do something just because it is doable. I think we must really resist to this temptation now before it is too late. I don't want to contribute to the hype of AI because I don't really understand what is meant with this and the different things meant by different people. If you mean how we can really have powerful algorithms and powerful computing systems taking big sets of data and trying to make sense of it and then perhaps using this to support our decision making process. I think this is a good thing to do under one condition that we develop some governance around the data which does not exist today. And I think this is extremely problematic just to create let's say a run on our data without taking any considerations about what this would mean for our self-determination options and our political autonomy. I think this is extremely problematic, the data issue and also our digital identity. These are the two things, if we don't resolve them then it will not be for good. I believe that this is a huge task that we are facing and nobody can do it alone. In IEEE we have a grassroots movement. The engineers come together in a dialogue with ethicists and philosophers. We try from the bottom up to make some recommendations based on what is technical, feasible but also politically advisable. This is a new territory also for us because it is not just technology, it is the impact of technology on social questions, ethical and also political. As such, we believe that all organizations that are like-minded should work together to address this and they have different perspectives. For instance, ITU is part of the UN system. It is about the government and the governments have to get aware of what we are talking here about. I'm not sure they understand all the consequences and then industry has to do something and they have created their consortia to look at it. This is our work then to organize the engineering communities because it is us, it is IEEE to come also with our perspective. Everybody has to work together to form this sensitive puzzle. If we talk now about the smart grids and the smart cities and also intelligent transportation and so on, there is a huge potential there for optimizing them technologically and get the best out of the used energy. But again, most of the problems are not to be solved technically. A lot of them have to do with our way of living, our concepts about mobility and so on. If we don't change them, I don't believe there would be technical solutions for the problems we are creating. So a smart city is a smart way of living first and then of smart meters in my opinion.