 One has asked a question. How does one go about developing the arguing skill sets? What are your takes for that? Arguing skill sets are developed by acquiring knowledge. If you know the law, you have all the confidence. You will not have diffidence. Moment you have diffidence, you will not be able to argue well. If you have confidence, you will be able to argue well. That confidence comes from the knowledge of law. If you know the law in its entire factual matrix, you will have the bravado to argue before any judge. But if you are not thorough with the facts or with the law, then you may have a false bravado. But then within a matter of three minutes, when the judge asks the question, it will all get dissipated. So know the law, know the facts, read well. Even at this age, even if I have read the brief hundred times, if the matter comes up tomorrow, I will at least brush up my memory by looking at my notes, looking at some of the pages the previous day. That is what you must do. You must never take things for granted. You must always remember that memory always fades. Of course, youngsters will have a better memory. There are some lawyers who have fantastic memory. But you must always be able to be crisp and be able to point out pages and annexures without batting an eyelid. Therefore, prepare yourself well. You can be a better lawyer. So according to you, empty vessels make more noise than ventriloquically recognize. Absolutely.