 I'm called to the meeting to order and the first item on the agenda is the agenda. And I would welcome a motion to adopt the order of motion. Thank you, President Pong. We go second. Okay. Second by Councilor McDee. Thank you. Your hearing is okay. So it's like, is there any discussion of motion? Seeing none, we'll go to vote. All those with fear of motion, please say aye. Aye. Very opposed. Motion carries unanimously. We have an agenda. Hello, everyone. Hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving. Thanks for coming together here. Looks like you're pretty manageable agenda. Hopefully we can get to it relatively quickly. We will next go to public forum. I do not see anyone in person for the public forum. We have a couple of attendees online. If you would like to be recognized, please use the raise hand function. If you're looking to be recognized for the public forum, going once, going twice, not seeing any hands. So we'll close the public forum and move to the consent agenda. The consent agenda, which is item, that's why I was complaining about item 3.01 through our minutes of November meetings. Can we have a motion regarding the consent agenda? So if somebody else wants to make a motion, Mayor, that's fine. I wasn't here on November 14th, so I feel like I should not be voting on that. I assume we're counselors McGee and Hightower. I can't remember if they were both here. Please, so yes. So if you don't mind breaking it up, I would make a motion to, I would, you wanna make the November 1st motion? Yeah, I would make a motion to approve the minutes of November 1st. Great, is there a second? Second by Councillor Hightower. Any discussion on the item 3.01, which are breaking up the consent agenda here. Any discussion on 3.01? Seeing none, we'll go to a vote. All those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries unanimously. And now, can we have a separate motion from Hessars McGee or Hightower on 3.02? I'll move to approve the minutes of November 14th as listed on board docs. Great. Second by Councillor Hightower. Great, excellent. And so just the three of us, I believe are voting on that. Any further discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That carries 3-0 with one abstentions. Okay, moving to item 4.01, we have three items, sorry, four items for approval and recommendation to the city council. 4.01 is the issuance of a grant anticipation note for the cost of certain air port improvement projects. Next to this, or Rich here. I will just quickly say, this is to approve a grant anticipation note in an amount of up to $10 million. It is exactly the same as an approval we've received last year. And just reflects the fact that the airport, much to our good fortune, is the recipient of several FAA grants, but we do need this instrument to ensure that we have the cash flow available. All the costs are built into those grants. So this is really just sort of standard operating procedure. But of course, any of us stand by to answer questions if you have any. Thanks. So I'll recommend that the council do the attention and also specifically note, although it's probably not protocol, but just simply that people understand that even the interest occurred on the GAN borrower when it's 100% reimbursable. So it's really bad as close as you can get to everything. Yes, like it is everything. And that's right. That is right. Okay. So yes, I will make a motion to approve the, to recommend that the council approve the attention. Second. Second from council. Hi, Tara. I'll just add it wasn't always standard operating procedure. It was a good innovation of last decade, my memory that we've been doing it this way. But it's been a good innovation. Any further discussion questions? No, I would just ask if there is a way to know and I could read all of the fine print. I probably didn't read everything. As far as the number of things where it covers, many projects, including runway, taxiway, terminal apron, noise mitigation, et cetera. Would anyone have any idea what the percentage of it is that is part of the noise mitigation measures for residences, residential sign installation or updating the noise exposure map? In percentage terms, does anyone have any idea? And if you don't, that's fine. I wouldn't have the percentage right off the bat. I think it's a, the $10 million is just used to draw down when it's very rare that we would use it for the noise program. In fact, I don't think we'd have any of the last many years. These are for the big, big construction costs in just in case that cash for those other things. Okay. All right. It is eligible though, but we decided to, right? Okay. Okay. Seeing no further hands. We'll go to vote. All those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Aye. All right, opposed. Motion carries unanimously. This brings us to 4.02, which are two grand amendments for the Justice Center. Rachel, you want to see this up? Sure. These are two amendments that have come to, towards grants that are already been approved by the board finance and city council. One for the department of corrections, one for the, from the AGO. The AGOs was made to make up with portions of money was distributed to diversionary and state to make up for lost fee revenue. Since our programs rely on fees to cover the budget. And since the pandemic has started, no agency is meeting their budgeted fee allotments. So the AGO added $30,000 to our grant. And then for the DOC, from Justice Reinvestment Act monies, they're distributing 5,000 per CJC around the state for DEI related initiatives. This is just a motion to accept additional money for approved grants. All right, good. Thank you for that, Rachel. Are we ready for a motion? I'm happy to make the motion as recommended on board docs. Great. Thank you, Councilor Geese. Seconded by Chairman President Paul. Further discussion? Seeing none, we'll go to a vote. All those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries unanimously. That ends the group. Thank you. 4.03, Utility is known with Green Mountain Power for being a technologies, I think it's a pretty straightforward item. Yes, it'll be here necessary. Floor's open for a motion. Questions? I would love just an explanation, even though despite the straightforward comment on there's just not like a whole lot of detail on what's going on and why in the memo, so. Certainly. So this is a utility easement with Green Mountain Power to allow them to install some underground cabling, which they will need access to their after installation for routine maintenance. And it is just a corner of our property. It does affect two others that G&P is working with them individually on. And it does feed the new beta facility. And when we're talking about clearing, because I think we said like, I guess how much land is being, like what is the volume of land that's being cleared or soil that's being moved? So the soil and the sod will be lifted, the underground utility will be installed and then it will be replaced for the top of it. And it's a small corner, not adding, yeah, a couple of thousand square feet. Great, thank you. Any further questions? There's a very formal motion. You guys recommend the report, Doug? Thank you, President Powell. Is there a second? I'll second that. Thank you, Justin McGee. Further discussion? I'll just say before we go to vote, I'm, it's exciting to see more steps towards the opening of that facility and things that we expect to be very impactful. In addition to what's happening at the airport. So with that, we will go to vote. All those in favor, motion please say aye. Thank you. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries unanimously. Thank you. Thank you. 4.04, final item of this section of the agenda, liquid, the Acer unit purchased from Northround Services. This is some, sorry, maybe it's some materials, I bested, but it's a $68,000 item. Does this need to go to the phone? I was going to ask that as well. Don't think it does. It's not a multi-year. All right, whoa, whoa. I think that was just a mistake. So that's the case that actually it's possible that the recommended action is really correct. I think that it's just in the wrong place. That is actually approving and recommending. Looks like it started to edit out the recommended. Right. Yeah, I'm telling you to do that. So that probably comes to the point. So I make a motion that we approve and authorize the purchase. Yes. Great. I'm talking about four brand services for the liquid D. I send you out of $68,000. Thanks for that motion. Is there a second? Second. Second by council. Hi, tower. And I think no, this is going to be a real benefit for us because it works in conjunction with the solid deice we put down. And that's it's actually going to increase the effectiveness of the solid deice that we currently use. And it reduces the amount of time that it takes for the action to keep it always open. So it's a huge amenity for us. So something that I do want to point out though, it's not 50 inch of booms. It's actually 50 foot there. So thank you for that clarification. Any discussion? Seeing that, we'll go to a vote. All those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Learning opponent's motion carries unanimously. Thank you. Two more items. 5.01 authorization to execute an amended contract for stormwater, dredging, invesitation, Google services, portland construction, corporations, DPW water resources. I am Chief and are you representing on this one? You are too. Great. Thanks. Do you want to see it up in the critic? So I can go first. We bid out a project with 100 cubic yards for comparing the bids. So we found the lowest bidder when we went to board of finance previously. We didn't increase that 100 cubic yards to the actual amount of cubic yards that we anticipate for this project. So that's the main cost. So that's a $14,500 increase. And there's a couple smaller items on there. So we got to minus those out. And so we have a total $18,469 request to increase for their contract. Thank you. I would like to see if we have a question or a question. So great. Thank you, Professor Paul. Is there a second? Second. Second by Chancellor Geith. Discussion? Seeing none, we'll go to vote. All those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Aye. Aye. Are there any opposed? The motion carries unanimously. And thank you both. Thank you. This brings us to the final action of a late request for who will have an E6,575 dollar budget neutral amendment for the FY23 airport budget. Welcome, Marie. You want to point to this one? So this budget amendment is sort of a standard protocol. We come to you during the year as we have things that we find we need to increase or decrease certain account items. And that is what we're doing here, trying to explain why we're doing it. And we were able to shift things around from savings we've had in other accounts or don't expect to have in other accounts. And some savings in our real estate taxes that we had over estimated, because we are always working with an estimated rate, as well as we did not have to use our revenue anticipation note. And we're not really doing that this year. So I was able to use those funds and reallocate them to where we needed them. Let's go ahead, Priscilla. Thank you. So when it comes to real estate taxes, that's $15,000. That's a small amount. How much was the, it was an estimate. Obviously, you have to have an estimate. The actual bills are lower than budgeted. Were they a lot lower than budgeted? They weren't a ton lower than budgeted. We're pretty close, because it's about $800,000 that we pay in taxes. So it's a fairly small amount that I've always tried to have it up there. Or pretty close to it. I mean, is $15,575 the vast majority of it? Yes. Well, of the average, correct. And as well on the debt service, you didn't view it just for $15,000 and you're not using it. We're not using it. Is that what you had in budget, $50,000? Yes. That was if we had needed to borrow under revenue participation now, that was the line item. And we are not doing that. Well, all right. You don't have to invent less, so there's one to make the motion as to where it goes. Thank you, President Paul. We have a motion. Do we have a second? Second. Thank you, Councillor Hightower. Any further discussion, questions? OK, so now we'll go to vote. All those up there, emotionally say aye. All right. All right, any opposed? Great, the motion carries unanimously. Thank you, Murray. Thank you, Team Airport. And with that, we have included all the business on the agenda. So if there is no objection, I will adjourn the Board of Finance at 5.4 PM. See you everybody next week.