 Well, you know, the biggest challenge for Erie today is that many of the national programs that it is assisting are also becoming very strong programs. So, you know, even Phil Rice today has a biotechnology program that's almost comparable to the program here at Erie, and if you get into, say, China, there's no way Erie can compete with the biotechnology programs in China just because of the numbers of scientists that they have and their ability to do things in a grand scale, not that the quality of the science here isn't as good. So, you know, Erie needs to really find its niche in an Asian situation in which the national programs are now quite capable as well. Now, I think there really is a niche for Erie. It's doing those kinds of things that can be shared across all of the rice research institutions in Asia or worldwide and that wouldn't likely be done by a national program, or if they were, that they wouldn't get shared by a national program. It can then be a coordinator, a source of knowledge and information, and continually a source of bleeding lines that have traits that have been generated through advanced science done throughout the world that no national program can probably access. Sub-1, the new lines that have submergence tolerance, that's a good example. The real work on that was done in California, and not only was the technology transferred, but the person that did the work, Dave McKell, was transferred from California to Erie, and so that next phase in that process was done at Erie, and now those materials are being shared with the national programs. So I really do think there's this important role for Erie to be the conduit by which and through which the best science in the world gets applied to rice research and then shared with the national programs in Asia.