 وَإِنْ تَعْجَبْ فَعْجَبٌ قَوْلُهُمْ أَيْذَا كُنَّا تُرَابًا أَيْنَا لَفِي خَلْقٍ جَدِيدَ أولئك الذين كفروا بربهم وأولئك الأغلال في أعناقهم وأولئك أصحاب النارهم في يا خالدون بسم الله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخيين وخيرين ومعاهاتكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أرسل كون A سشن مع صدر رحمة حسن أخبرنا سأتكلم الأسئلة التي تخبرناها في مدرسنا أسئلة في مدرسنا at thehotseatpodcast.com أسئلة التي أخبرناها فيها سأتكلم الأسئلة التي تخبرناها في مدرسنا ما يمكنك أن تؤدي في مدرسنا دعوة سين سنتكلم كون A سشن بين كل مدرسنا في مدرسنا سيكونون سؤالات على هذه المساعدة أحد الأمر سأكون غير أخير في المدرسنا at thehotseat هو إجابة لتدعم الأسئلة لتخبرك عن المساعدات التي تتكلمنا لا تبدأ مشكلة سنأخبر في الأسئلة، سوف نتلعب دعوة سين أخبرنا من يؤمن في مدرسنا دعوة سين أعطي هؤلاء السؤالات في مدرسنا دعوة مدرسنا أول is if someone is calling to innovation openly, for example a Kharegi calling to word Khuruj openly Does the Khujja, i.e. the proof, have to be established upon him before calling him an innovator or can he be warned against and be labeled an innovator before his misguidance is made clear to him The person who's been accused of Khawarijism or somebody saying he's a Kharegi I also feel like it's important and it's necessary, people need to verify because some issues that I've seen people accuse others of being Kharegi is not Khuruj, it has nothing to do with Khawarijism For example recently I saw a brother say anyone who says that Tariqa Salah is Khawarij This is views of Ahlu Sunnah, you can't say that If you abandon the prayer you're Khawarij It has nothing to do with Khawarijism This is a strongest view of Ahlu Sunnah So people need to verify and know what makes a person Khawarij is and what isn't Because a lot of people today, they fall into Irja themselves So everything for them, my heart is good and no actions are needed So first I'll say Tattabut, verify what is the belief of the Khawarij What is the belief of Ahlu Sunnah and Jama'a Then you can say what's Second is that if it becomes clear to you after you've done your research and your person who has knowledge Then Hurja is needed to be established on the person You have to prove to the person that their view is wrong And remove that doubt from the person And explain to them what is right from what is wrong Okay, even if he's calling to us openly it doesn't change that The proof still needs to be established Yeah, the proof needs to be established Okay, the second question I have And I think it's important to provide a bit of context around this We mentioned on the podcast Imam Manawi And how we fell into issues with the names and attributes of Allah And you said that the proof had to be established against him or upon him And I said, are you really expected to believe that he was calling to Islam for this long And the proof wasn't shown to him And you said, yeah, I have to believe that I have to have khusn al-Lan The question that's come in here is Regarding the comment on Imam Manawi In his Minhaj when he discusses matters relating to Al-Qaeda In which he differs with Ahlu Sunnah on some of these matters You notice he discusses the opinion of Ahlu al-Halith But he then differs with them Does this not suggest that the khujja, the proof has been made? A very good question I was really amazed with that person The Minhaj that they're talking about here is a Shahr-Hafsa Muslim Just to make it clear Because Imam Manawi has a Kitab on the Fiqh al-Shafi'i Where he summarized it from the محرر That's not the book that the person is talking about here They're talking about the Shahr-Hafsa Muslim It's called the Minhaj And it's true sometimes he mentions He mentions the Ahlu Sunnah And then he mentions the belief of the Ahlu Al-Kalam And then it was said that Ahlu Al-Halith believed this That doesn't mean that the proof was established on him Because establishing the proof means Whatever doubt is with you is removed And whatever is right is then being told to you That's what we're talking about here Just because I know the many views out there Doesn't mean the proof has been established on me And that's what Nawawi didn't receive It's that the path is cleared for him A path is made clear to him That this is the right way We don't have that And the Imam of Nawawi is a great Imam And a man like him If he was informed of what was wrong from what is right With the sincerity that we see of this great man The nobility that's in this great man And the Imam of Nawawi, we know he would have left it The final question I have for you And this is more of a practical question When someone in our local city For example, let's say London Has fallen into innovation Who exactly establishes the proof on him And who lawfully labels him an innovator Is it the students of knowledge in the city Or is it the big scholars that are outside the city And if it's a big scholar Then how practical is it for the big scholar Who's living in a different country To speak to that particular person If the person fell into an issue of a mistake And it's a mistake that we mentioned last time For example, he goes against Ahlu Sunnah In the source in which they take their evidence from Then that doesn't require scholars That doesn't require solid scholars Like if the person says I'm not going to take the hadith of the Messenger of God And things like that It doesn't require the scholars This is مزدر تلقي But if the person fell into Other issues of عقيدة Mistakes Then this is a تبديع Is a مسألة اتهادية تبديع To label a person a مبتدع And it goes back to اهلوليج تيهاد The اهلول العلم The people of knowledge They're the ones who Label this person in ايناويتا They're the ones who And the issue of تكفير as well They're the ones who do it But it's not left for the عامة النس And definitely not left It's not sorry It's not left for the students of knowledge And it's definitely not left For the general mass It's not generally left for the It's not left for the general mass So it's something that the scholars The people of knowledge Who are allowed to do تيهاد Who even if they get it wrong They get one reward for it And if they get it right They get two rewards for it They're the ones who can do this So just to address The second part of the question Which is how practical is it For a scholar To speak to a person In a city Like the Imam of a Masjid In a city الحمد لله The communication in the world Is very good So the people go back To the people of knowledge They present the situation Of the person to the Shaykh And they tell it With fair, sincere, genuine Mana Like عبدالله بن عمر رضي الله عنه وَنْ يَحَبْنِ يَعْمَرَنْ حُمَيْدِ بِنْ عَبدالحِمَانِ الْحِيمِرِ He came to him About the issue of the Qadaria Who came out in Iraq And what they were saying And when they formed عبدالله بن عمر They told about these people Who they were What they were like Everything Then عبدالله بن عمر Gave them a ruling He said فأخبرهم أني بريء منهم They tell them I am free from them And they are free from me And then he told them Allah is not going to accept Their righteous deeds Until they believe in the Qadar So they took it back To عبدالله بن عمر رضي الله عنه And when they asked him And he clarified it for them So the people should Go back to scholars like that Go and contact the scholars Ask them Inform the situation correctly Be fair in the way You put the situation to the Shaykh Because the Shaykh Is going to answer it In the way you put it to him He is going to say Whatever question you ask him If you say Shaykh If a person drinks alcohol What is the ruling regarding them And the Shaykh goes That person is a Fasek And the person you are applying On wasn't drinking alcohol Is drinking apple juice But he had in a bottle That you couldn't understand You can't apply The Shaykh's Fetwa here right now Because the Shaykh's Fetwa Is based on someone Who drank alcohol أسلاد جزاك الأخير Very very helpful answers Until next time في أمان الله والسلام ورحمة الله وبركاته ورحمة الله وبركاته أتمنى أنك أردت الأسئلة لأسئلة الأسئلة أردت أنك if you have any questions on any of the topics we've discussed so far email your questions in to questionsatthehotseatpodcast.com That's questionsatthehotseatpodcast.com