 The elements of the system that I think are most problematic are that the incentives for individual reward are Not necessarily aligned with the values that we have for scholarly activity. I don't benefit in my career Direction, obviously There isn't it isn't clear how I benefit from being transparent with my work, right of being openly sharing Not just of the output the final paper, but the process by which I generated those claims Did I just did I pursue a confirmatory design or was this exploratory? Did I analyze the data lots of different ways or not? Is my data available for you to examine to To see if my claims are believable All of that maybe At present is aspirational. Yeah, those are good things. We value that in the society In scholarly activity, but we don't incentivize it