 Thank you very much. I think that it has been two days of very diverse and intensive contributions. I think that Habitat 3 offers the opportunity to provoke this intensification of the conversation about urbanization and cities, and that we should take this advantage, this opportunity to try to qualify the conversation and try to share ideas and concepts. I've seen in the last table, especially, a lot of expectations about the text of the Habitat 3 resolution. And I think that Peñalosa has, Enrique has said it very well. There's a consensus in the United Nations that urbanization policy is a national policy. It's not an international policy. It's not an international treaty about how urbanization should be. Then it's not compulsory, and it doesn't oblige to any member state. Then that has an inconvenience, of course, or that it's just that, a declaration, but it has an advantage and is that in the UN, when things are compulsory or they became legislation, then the negotiation, it's to the last word. But when it's not oblige, you know, following, it allows for a little bit more of liberty. That is for all of you to be aware of that. The other question is that in the process of preparation of Habitat 3, there have been something like 15,000 people involved in the issue papers, policy papers, regional meetings, thematic meetings, and the Internet Forum. Registrate people in the official participation of the agenda, around 15,000 people, which, of course, it's a very broad participation, and out of that came the first draft of the zero draft. But the zero draft has been already submitted to the Bureau of the PREP-COM of Habitat 3. That means to the representative of the member states. And now the text is only on the hands of the member states. Then further contributions or changes or improvements, which I am sure that they are needed in many sense, should be done through your member states. It's just for you to know. Okay. Then in that sense, the declaration for me, it's important, but it's not the most important outcome of Habitat 3. For me, the most important outcome of Habitat 3 is the conversation that is taking place. And if we are collectively, the community of people that we are interested in that, if we are able to change a little bit the paradigm of urbanization in order to help whoever is there to do a little better urbanization. I was very impressed by the last question that came from the public. The young architect working in, I think she said in Vietnam, she asked, well, I am paid for the developer, and although I would like to do a little bit better urbanism or city growing, the developer is paying me and then we need to do houses. Then the clients, also they want houses. Then who is going to say that this is not the convenient thing? And this question has been unanswered. Yesterday I talked about who does what in urbanization. And in this who does what, there's still a lot that we need to advance. And that has to do with something that it has been touched very well, and it's the incompleteness of the governance systems of local authorities. It has to, and urbanization in general, it has to do with the democratic deficits. It has to do with, my impression at least in the developing world is that we have too much architecture and we don't have enough urbanism. We don't have problem in the developing world of having good architects to build buildings. And even to do projects. I have seen in the approach of a little bit yesterday this idea that we are going to address the urban issues through projects, urban projects. And I think that urban projects is not, if you have listened well to Madame Mosisi or to the Mayor Peñalosa, they have not talked about architecture. In any sense, their problems, they are not in architecture. In terms that they have expressed, they are in very different order. Then I think that we need to find out the dialogue between urbanism and politics because at the end urbanization is about politics. The ants and the termites and all that, they do their habitat by instinct. But we do our cities by politics, not by instinct. And then the scale of the size of our cities are becoming so big that its governance is becoming very complex, very difficult. Yes, I am finishing. But let me just say this idea. I think that what we are, the deficit, the biggest deficit that we are finding now in urbanization in this rapid process of urbanization worldwide is innovative proposals to increase democratic participatory forms of governance that can provide the kind of city that the citizens deserve. And that includes in this work that is needed in that direction that includes the spatial layout because the spatial layout is very important not just for environmental reasons, which is very obvious that it's very important but also for economic reasons, for social reasons, etc. President Renzi, when we were opening the Biennale just a couple of months ago in his speech he just referred that he came from the G20 and in the morning of the G20, they spent the G20, the head of states of the G20 they spent two and a half hours talking about urbanization, worldwide urbanization. And this is because urbanization has become a strategic issue related with development of course but also peace, look at the Arab Spring, even terrorism, migrations, the planetary transformation that is taking place through urbanization it's becoming a strategic issue at the level of global governance and the tools that the member states, the governments are addressing the urbanization are very weak. And I think that Habitat 3 hopefully with the contribution of all the ideas that are here should have the opportunity, at least this is what we are thinking of arising this question and trying to respond at least in some manner to the who should do what in relation to urbanization. Thank you very much.