 A few presentations will give the Russian floor now to John. Yes, thank you very much. Last time I hope it will be better than I expected. Yes, we hear you very better. Very good. I'm very sorry that I did not participate in the speaking. I think you can believe me it would be very tempting to be in Cyprus with that being in Toronto and to make this more clear to Cyprus community. So, two presentations give you some examples of how two of these case studies went out. So, objective of the work was implications and benefits and challenges of the radio information analysis can be demonstrated. Also, the test case for the methods and tools that have been developed to provide a one-to-three and for students to engage and not only for us scientists, but also for consultants and infrastructure stakeholders. We did investigate, accordingly, the case study was a time back where to the developments of World Report 1 and 3 because we had to build on some of the research that had been developed there. So, there was a call for the case studies early 2016 and it is a call for World 21 teams that responded and it is there the work on the case study of post-advocation of work on the case studies. The topics that have been represented by this can be one of the suggestions for the case study did reach over any kinds of different structural systems, applications where value of information was addressed in the operation phase but also in the design phase of different kinds of projects. And information that was considered in this case study was not only related to structure-based monitoring but also came from discrete inspection measurements on the structure. So, that's one of the more important things, not the entire approach one of the title, is actually to consider all kinds of information in this case study. And then I had a realization of this case study which was developed by thousands of individual teams and it was the aim that the fact sheets are used that follows on that workflow is brought by action workshops but it should be highlighted that this was the two reasons at various schools, first one on promo point and the second one and now for recently in Tokyo and they did have a lot for the further development of this case study. And now to besides, so for one, unfortunately for the 21 case studies they have not been followed further after the first proposal. And so the next slide, I think, which suggests that at 17 case studies have been further developed which is saying that they are very, very informative when it comes to the practical implementation of this case study. So change fact sheets have been developed, they have been finalized as true to the finalization. The conclusions in the YAPS-1 program have been recently released in one and a set of paper conclusions on the YAPS-1 and Monorai-1 that takes place in 2019. It's great because we participated in a classification, classification was used and it was described fact sheets of one on six was written by Kastia and Nipra to discuss the case test in flight for these nine case studies which was the next slides also. And the summarizing paper will be also presented in Monorai-ish YAPS-1 so it will be drafted by Sebastian and Paolozant. I think maybe we can discuss this afterwards and I managed to understand your questions and comments. So on the implementation of various information analysis of the concept, the practical context, it's in the handling of course, not the secret, it's only for him. And the challenges are associated mainly as a reason for the system representation. In order to capture first the events that need to work really well in the right consequences. So the limit states, where we describe these events, for instance the failure in the states, they are very often not directly connected to a read through to the consequences. And also in state events that goes well in context, they can be any forward but also cascading in states in the time so that's very, very hard to capture in a very good information analysis. But at the same time, it's very mild that we're planning to make it a prior but to make sure that our work in our work should add a good combination in order to reflect that the many days in global characteristic or we measure quite well probably in the end to be not directly connected to it. And really to ensure that the system is overall. While we measure globally and the end result in the focus on the criteria, the case in present not only related to what we can to use information to control our analysis but also let us know if something in some of the changes was quite obvious and this is the most straightforward. Yes, so I think we're going to come up with a very big challenge, we have a great discussion about this, maybe. Yes, I hope that we try to guide the discussion and we'll hear you, by the way. Yes, I think we know that. Yes? Okay, let's find it so we can ask if you have any questions. Come here and I'll be right in front. So, any questions? We have these concepts of these 10 days that we should have on this list in the web page in the workshop. Yes, I would say. And then we are sharing another six certain lives, which are under review. Yes? Is there any general... Sorry, I'm using the wrong microphone. Is there any general facts on the case studies, let's say, on structuring the case studies or something like that, up to now or is it planned? It's just for my understanding. What kind of thinking? The general facts on the case studies, to structure the case studies, let's say we have five on bridges, three on buildings, then we have five... In the case studies, we have the case study, the case study of the case studies that we have a common introduction to them. Okay. Okay, thank you. Maybe we can build on partly on the content that connects to these cases that we are writing, also from the methodological point of view, some of them are using, let's say, decision and pre-positivity by Asian analysis, some are more from the engineering point of view using that and so on, because they have been looking into them, so they are all of them a little bit different, so they cover the wide field of application, I think. Yeah, I agree with you that how close to the different case studies did... To the point where the actions can be followed, I think we we could also, I mean, we are not so very organized in where the actions can be followed, right? Okay, then I suggest we must very forward seem to have more practice on the general point of the project. Yeah, this is my question. This is my question. And there is the information source for all the work, and EEM also and to find a way of how we may shortly present the 5th work on a webpage that will be interior which is there. And we will also come back to do the work for the S&I, so it could be a physical work in switching. All of the presentations did not say it, so we will focus on this for you. So I think you should also make a website with some of the information also next time. Yes, another point of my point is did I overlook the special teaching for the the U.S. Congress in the world of English or what's the other side? Can you ask me about the special teaching? Yes. Oh, I'm sorry. So what's the other side or did we visit? One. Do we special issue on the building of the U.S. Congress? Yes. I did not mention that. Maybe I should inform that Hilda, Sosa, Sebastian, myself, we are in the work before here, published in the scientific journal. And I think here is also how important push is more as now as to their role and as a percentage we should have a little discussion about this. What was your point about the special teaching in the world of English and the presentation? Thank you. Yes. How many are you in the world? And now for the for the further session of the work before here, Sebastian, would like to ask you to share the two presentations. Yes. Yes. So, yes. Never do you want to do more than just direct the camera to the screen and then follow the presentations? Or would be nice to be here in the work. We will try. So, we will switch off your audio. Yes. Thank you very much.