 Next up, Senator Grassley. Thank you, Madam Chairman. My first question is to Professor Morton, Mr. Lewis and Ms. Lewis. In your testimony, you expressed support for the American Online Innovation Choice Act. How it deals with the digital market abuses. You've just heard a testimony by Professor Francis and Professor Kandub expressing a number of concerns with the bill. So I'd like to have the three of you briefly explain why you agree or disagree with Professor Kandub and Francis. A COA is very specific in the anti-competitive harms it's trying to solve, issues of self-preferencing, issues of tying, issues of control of data. And so I think the specificity that Mr. Francis is looking for is in the bill. Regarding the concerns about free expression, free expression is a core value for my organization, I believe that a COA specifically targets anti-competitive harms. And I don't believe that content moderation on a platform, a single platform, is necessarily an anti-competitive harm. Discrimination. Do you have other platforms to choose from? Well, you do. Discrimination looks different on every platform, but the internet has infinite channels. And by promoting competition, we're giving users a choice of platforms to go to. And I know there's going to be another hearing on content moderation in the future. I think that's the proper place where folks are concerned with too much or too little content moderation to address those concerns specifically. But this bill dealing with anti-competitive harms has a secondary impact that by promoting competitive choices lets users vote with their feet and go elsewhere if they don't like the moderation choices that they're given on a specific platform. So I don't think it's restrictive at all. And I don't find those choices to moderate content to be anti-competitive.