 Well, essentially, from a very general perspective, structure transformation relates to the changing structure of the economy, but also the changing nature of how production generally is organized within the economy. So for instance, if the economy is moving more from an agreeing one to one that is industrialized, you can think of it as actually transforming the structure of the economy. Now, in the context of African economies, we have seen, particularly in the last 20 or so years, changes in the composition of the different sectors of the economy. However, within the African context, what one notices is that the changing composition of the different sectors of the economy is kind of being driven more by resource, so for instance, when we've seen increases in discoveries in oil and indeed in oil production, you then tend to find that the composition of the country's output changes in favor of some of these natural resource sectors are supposed to actually change in the structure of the economy in a fundamental way. If you do have an economy that is changing structurally, that economy should be able to absorb the youth, the barging youth. Now, what we tend to find in Africa is the fact that because the natural resources are what is actually driving the current growth, you tend to find and these sectors are not necessarily the sectors that can absorb the large majority of the youth. So what you tend to find is that the sectors are changing with respect to their contribution to GDP, but you are not finding the kind of employment dividend that typically is associated with the true structural change, if I could put it that way. Obviously, it is important for governments to understand what is changing in the economies with respect to the structure. It is not just enough, for instance, for the fact that we've seen increases in growth over the years and therefore we should start jubilating. Governments should understand that if the growth that you observe is not growth that is associated with increasing employment and growth that is associated with true transformation of the structure of the economy, you are likely to have problems with respect to employment and that growth is certainly not sustainable, both politically but also socially. So in essence, where we have observed some of these growth patterns, it is important that governments sit and rethink its investment and development strategies with respect to the manufacturing sector. It is the first best option, if I could put it that way, because you cannot, for instance, I know some people have advocated for increasing, say, ICT, concentration on investment in ICT sector, like in India. However, the nature of the human capital in sub-Saharan Africa is such that they are not necessarily that mobile across sectors. So you cannot, say, pick the typical youth in agriculture and then put them in an ICT sector. Manufacturing, in my opinion, and here I'm not thinking of the top theory of manufacturing if you take the array of terms along the manufacturing path, for instance. But generally, if you look at those such as agro-processing, now these sectors offer more potential with respect to absorbing the youth than would any other sectors, in my opinion, at least within the short to medium term. I am afraid to say I'm a bit of a pessimist on that, primarily because I think that we can do more with respect to the structure of the growth that we are observing within Africa. In particular, the fact that the growth seems to be driven, largely by the resource sectors. So I'm a pessimist on that front. On the other hand, I think that Africa has made important strides from a political perspective, and the politics do matter for the economics. And so I think we will get there, but I believe that it will take a bit longer than some other optimist thing. Human capital, absolutely without a doubt. Of course, we need to do the things which will keep people in jobs today, but I think for a large part of our history over the last 30 or so years, we have ignored human capital. And in particular, in my opinion, human capital at the tertiary level more generally. So we have invested a lot in getting at the numbers with respect to primary education. But it hasn't necessarily, over the last 30 years, translated into significant human capital because we've actually ignored the tertiary level education. Obviously, I have benefited enormously from my relationship with Weyder. I came here as an intern in 2000, just when I was finishing my PhD. But what it gave me, apart from the environment within which to work with very seasoned researchers on development, it also provided a platform where I could actually network. And that in itself was a very, very important part of my career development. So it does provide, for me, in my opinion, and I keep encouraging some of my younger colleagues to also engage more with Weyder. It provides a very good platform, A, for the quality of work that it does here, focused on development. But also it provides that platform where you could then network with some of the more seasoned researchers on development.