 panwraeth o'r stediwynydd. Mae'r ffordd yn gwybod i gael gweithio ac yn byw gwael hwn i'r ffordd mae'n byw yn fawr. Mae'n gael yn wlad drwy ar y dyfodol. Rwy'n gwybod i'r gweithio gydag y byddwch yn y gallu gwirionedd o'r newid o'r dyfodol ac mae'n gweithio gweithio ar y byddwch. Dyna gweithio'r devolwysg yw'n dyfodol ac y cerddol yn cael Ysgrifennidiaeth ystod o'r trefyn yr ysgrifennidiaeth FINÙL 2020, pobliadau hyn o'rmbag a'r regerau'r regerau yn ôl ystod, i'n pwynt gwynedd ymlaen i fynd i'n gwybod yn Bref. Ysgrifennidiaeth ystod o'r llei ysgrifennidiaeth yn 2012 wrth Cymru yn ei tanfag o ran yr ysgrifennidiaeth ystod o enw i'r llyfyn i'ch gilydd Cyfwyr yn 2015 i'w ysgrifennidiaeth a'u credu nesaf yw'r newydd yn amlwystenio gymrydol i'ch gwirio gryfau ar ystod o'r y cwpwl. We are tasked, by Scottish Minister, to become the lead body in regard to the perspective on historical environment. This process also resulted in 2014, with the publication of Our Place in Time, which set out the Scottish Government strategy for the historical environment. This remains Scotch Government's main statement or planning for the historical environment outside of planning. One of the main tenets of op-it, as it has become known, is y concept of mainstreaming, ensuring the historic environment remains at the heart of a modern dynamic Scotland, and it is embedded within policy making across the Scottish Government. Initially, it was adopted by many Scottish government departments and it came towards the finalisation of the last SRDP programme, which was underpinned by years of previous natural heritage research and mapping. We had a very short window to try to get the historic environment in yn ddweud wneud. Maen nhyn nhw'n bwysigon nhw'n pergyrwm y teimlo fydd ymdiannau cyfieithlo'r cyfrifodol, maen nhw'n cael ddweud ac nid eu cael ffrieithiol gyddon ni'n hefyd. Mae'r ddweud yn y ffwg llythwyr i'r ddweud gyfrifodol gyllideb yn y gymhwyme malu'r cyfrifodol gyda'r Liaethu gyfrifodol gyda Llyfr Ewro'r Fyryd mewn prynmygu oedol i'r dysgu tyfnol oedd ers Unedol ac Euryeb oedd yn y cyfrifodol a'u Oesirlledd, Ond mae'n rhaglen bydd yn cael eu blyw gael ei myfnwyr o'r cyfnodau yng nghymru i'r cyflwc gyflwc gyda'r ysgol mennul yng nghymru. Fe byddwn i'n i suqaeth o'r cythafodon fel myfnwyr holl yn ymddangos gan gripwydurMM FOSYN, ac mae'n rhoi bod yn tystio yn rydyn ni'n meddiledig. Efallai o'ch mwyno a'r yr Colei gynnig oedd arno. Ond o'i gweithio, mae'n meddifol ni'n meddill sylwch i ffarnwch, Mae'r ddau ffordd ar hynny, Gwyrdun kidswr a fanchau blach, oeddo i ddau a diolch ar y ddau ac yn ddau i'r ddau hefyd. The story environment on there is clear benefits for the conflict between the different areas of the conflict. Once we provide advice to the UnPUs on benefits to the monument that is added to the waiting, it is a potential for a successful grant application. As we move forward, the ability to sustain mainstreaming has faded, maintaining a dialogue with and the willingness of Scottish Government departments to continue to consider the historic environment is now proving quite challenging to say the least. Nevertheless, as we move towards a new agricultural scheme, there's a fresh opportunity to work with colleagues who will cross the regular spectrum and present new evidence of the impacts that land uses have on the historic environment and on the success or otherwise of the existing programme in order to inform future decision making. Obtaining data from the grant awarding departments on which schemes we have coveted on and which our advice has been taken on board has also proved problematic. However, we can continue to provide data on the changing condition of scheduled monuments. This is largely achieved through our field officer programme. This programme has been operating since 1999 to be called a monument awarding programme, meaning that we have over 20 years of data background. Our aspiration is to visit every monument over a five-to-ten-year cycle and it's prioritised on risk when increasing it specifically where we think monuments may have been affected by their agricultural and environment schemes. As well as a written assessment, each monument is given a score out of five based on condition and risk and these figures allow us to monitor change over time and the success or otherwise of the management regimes. Data on its success is still of the current scheme being collated, but a number of trends are becoming apparent. Overall, we are witnessing a decline in the condition of 21% of our monuments. This is particularly pronounced in standing military buildings, especially those in the south-west of Scotland, and standing buildings proven particularly vulnerable to climate change and increased wetness, which is affecting very much that part of Scotland. Forestry has also proven to be one of the greatest residue monuments of all kinds. Crop marks don't seem particularly under threat, but this is likely to be a cause of our methodologies. Over the last few years, we have developed new sources of data which we hope will inform future programmes on-going aerial photography over many years is also allowing us to begin to demonstrate the impact of soil erosion, over scheduled crop marks, as well as helping us gain access to information about well-head condition on standing military monuments. It reminds us that our historic land use assessment for the whole of Scotland has taken quite a long time for us to get there. This maps relics and historic landscape types and allows us to monitor the contribution to modern landscapes. This data is also very useful in a number of other ways. HLA allows us to quantify the relic resource and to say something about its distribution and current management. Here we can see the distribution of Roman military land use, and we can quantify it, and therefore we can monitor it. We know how these locations have been managed, so we can say with a certain amount of confidence that, in this example, over three quarters of this resource is under active cultivation within modern, modern, retal and ear fields. We can also compare this present and past mapping of land use to make observations about how land use has changed. Comparing HLA with Ordnance Survey map data from the 1930s, we can see an expansion of places like Burnferman, this urban expansion most likely influenced by the building of the fourth road bridge in the 1960s, and here we can see the impact of over 80 years of forestry policy in the south-west of Scotland. Using Ordnance data and forestry and energy mapping, automated processes have been developed to highlight possible areas of land use change. These areas are then peer reviewed by members of the HLA team. The raves to update the HLA of a three-year cycle enable us to give statistics and a bit of a change to relevant landscape types. The mapping update is complemented by another monitoring photography programme, where a selection of land use locations will have aerial and ground photography taken during each updated cycle. The image to grow a set of case studies that can be used to visualise future discussions and land use change. This is what HES is carrying out in partnership with SNH of Scottish Natural Heritage, which is our sister or brother body who deal with the natural heritage. In addition SNH have been given access to the HES sites database, CANMO, to help enable them to produce case studies of past land use change using HES's collection of data of historical photography. One of the areas we have had a particular success over the last few years is on the front of landscapes, particularly in partnership with SNH and assisted by the HLA data. This takes its lead from the Scottish Government's national planning framework and the recently published Landscape and the Historic Environment Conference statement, which both take the lead from the European Landscape Convention, which is headed to be resisted by the Scottish politics. Both take quite a progressive approach and recognise both the historic and natural environments contribution to landscapes and their communities. We've used this as well to help revise and ensure the historic environment is impeded into the 366th Landscape Heritage Types of Scotland, which has allowed us to contribute to landscape characterisation, which also informs planning and land use decisions. The internist allows us to take a fresh look at existing landscape designations and policies, which have worked into existing landscape designations and policies, which all have the hooks for considering the historic environment, for which today have been largely ignored. That's largely our fault as an organisation, but I think that's quite a positive change. This is also encouraging rural research to think about how to embed the historic environment into ecosystem services and approaches to natural capital. For us, this has never really proved a natural fit, but it can be a few tentative steps. You'll see that this is by the Houghton Institute, rather than by ourselves. Developing various different kinds of algorithms to think about a time depth and a concentration of different kinds of designations. The results are a bit skewed, but it's a nice first step and I think it's positive in the fact that we can bring it together. We've got a positive dialogue and build on from there. I'm looking forward to Vince's talk about how other areas can bring that forward. Thanks very much.