Loading...

Viktor Schauberger Vortex with Dan Winter's Imploder - Accelerating Plant Growth

13,974 views

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Nov 3, 2010

The results after watering plants and consumption after cycling it through the imploder show up to 350% growth in plants.
See the first 3 websites for A Lot of information and verification, comparison pictures.

Within the past year there have been MAJOR breakthroughs in magnetism which allow for unimaginable applications.

http://www.theimploder.com
http://fractalfield.com/implodernews
http://www.GoldenMean.info

Fist Fights with Physicists:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfUhvm...

Rodin Coil under water:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XCJHe...

Non-Linear Magnetics (CMR):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq_iPP...

Non-Contact Attachment (CMR):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocr_d_...
.
.
Water - The Great Mystery:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6iwAZ...

Cure Cancer with Spinning Water:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWApeC...

Top Secret Water:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJhogR...

Vortex Water:
http://www.Vorsong.com

Please enjoy this playlist of PROFESSOR JOHN SEARL's work:
http://www.YouTube.com/view_play_list...

http://www.JohnSearlStory.com/
http://www.SwallowCommand.com/
http://www.SearlSolution.com/

A Message from Searl Magnetics:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39140466/Me...

Imagine applying knowledge of Dan Winter, Marko Rodin, Dr. Masaru Emoto, Walter Russell, Viktor Schauberger, Ed Leedskalnin, John Keely, John Searl, Ernst Chladni, Tibetan monks, etc.
.
Math describes absolutes and perfection.
Nature is imperfect and nothing is absolute.
1 + 1 = 2 works on paper because it's not talking about reality.
1 apple + 1 apple = almost 2 apples because everything degrades by the time you reach your answer. We need a symbol denoting the simultaneous degradation of an equation AS you reach your answer.
Decomposing A + Decomposing B = Decomposing C

The Apple of my Eye:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48284399/Th...
.
Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat
http://www.feandft.com/Dr.%20Bhat.htm

Helical Helix book:
http://www.feandft.com/Helical%20Heli...

Vortex Basics:
http://www.feandft.com/vortex_basics.htm

Newton's first law supposes or assumes that "a body remains at rest".
But NO celestial body is at rest. Therefore, this assumption is not substantiated. "or if in motion it remains in uniform motion with constant speed in a straight line unless it is acted on by an unbalanced external force".

A straight line on a globe is only theoretical and practically it becomes a curve.
The Fallacy of a Straight Line
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36586248/Th...

Again a rotating Earth or any other celestial body going its orbit is bound to encounter with external forces at every instant and can never be expected to maintain a straight line.
If acceleration is to be considered, there is no possibility of starting with zero at any time or at any place.
Therefore, the first law becomes obsolete.

The second law - when all bodies are in motion an "acceleration
produced by an unbalanced force acting on a body is proportional to the magnitude of the net force and invariably proportional to the mass of the body"

F=ma P=mg (weight=mass x gravity)

This also becomes obsolete because on a moving object where we are located and form part of the system, we can't determine its mass or net force.

F ≠ma. All bodies are inherently weightless. Like pressure potential seeks Like pressure. Opposites DO NOT attract. North always runs away from South.

The situation is much clear in Heisenberg's (1927) uncertainty principle "It is impossible to measure accurately both the positional and momentum of a particle simultaneously".

The third law of Newton states that "when ever one body exerts a force upon a second body, the second body exerts a force upon the first body. These forces are equal in magnitude and oppositely directed."

This statement assumes that both bodies are initially at rest. Also assumes that one body moves faster than the other. The statement assumes that the bodies move in straight lines. Each body moves in n - dimension and the movement is continuous. This being the case such assumptions become historic but obsolete.

The time of action of one body is totally different from the time of any reaction.
Both the curvature of the space- time unit on one hand which flows eternally as well as the impossibility of time flowing backward in the reverse direction on the other are sufficient reasons to logically discard the stated assumptions.
.
.
Walter Russell:
A New Concept of the Universe
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45559746/A-...

Genero - Radiative Concept or The Cyclic Theory of Continuous Motion
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49306163/Wa...

The Universal One
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49306379/Wa...

Loading...


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...