 We are now finally moving after six months of serious efforts, the IEA is moving to the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant. As you know, we have a very, very important task there to perform, to assess the real situation there, to help stabilize the situation as much as we can. Do you believe that the Russians will let you see what's really happening at the plant? Well, we are a team of very experienced people. I'm bringing here the best and the brightest in safeguards, in safety, in security, and we will have a pretty good idea of what's going on. You know, without clarity, my mission is a technical mission. It's a mission that seeks to prevent nuclear accidents. We are moving. We are aware of the current situation. There has been increased military activity, including this morning, until very recently, a few minutes ago. I have been briefed by the Ukrainian regional military commander here about that and the inherent risks. But weighing pros and cons and having come so far, we are not stopping. As you know, we are going to start immediately an assessment of the security and the safety situation at the plant as it is right now. We are going to be liaison and consulting with the staff at the facility. And I am going to consider the possibility of establishing a continued presence of the IAEA at the plant, which we believe it's indispensable to stabilize the situation and to get regular, reliable, impartial, neutral updates of what the situation is there. I have just completed a first tour of the key areas that we wanted to see in this first approach to the whole facility. Of course, there is a lot more to do. My team is staying on. More importantly, and most importantly, we are establishing a continued presence from the IAEA here. With my team here, we have a lot of work in terms of a detailed analysis of some of the more technical aspects of what we saw. And I will continue to be worried about the plant until we have a situation which is more stable, which is more predictable. It is obvious that the plant and the physical integrity of the plant has been violated several times. By chance, by deliberation, we don't have the elements to assess that. But this is a reality that we have to recognize. And this is something that cannot continue to happen. The technicians, when there are two groups, there is a group that is going to be there until Sunday or Monday, continuing with the assessment, in a certain sense continuing what I started today in the same places I was looking today. We could draw up a number of questions and initial observations, initial assessments, and they are going to dig deeper into that so we can have a report. We had splendid support from the United Nations security team that is here with me as well. So I think we showed that the international community is there, could be there, and we are continuing this. I would summarize, I need to continue my trip now. I would summarize by saying that our work has only started now. We've just landed actually, I don't know, three or four minutes ago after what has been a very important week, I believe, for Ukraine and for nuclear safety. I have, from the beginning of this situation, I have been trying to describe what is going on and its impact on the safety and the security of the plant through a number of pillars that try to address the things that in any nuclear power plant, in any nuclear installation in the world, should be taken care of. What is behind here and sustaining here is a very thorough technical analysis, of course, of how we see the situation at the plant. What we are doing there is stabilizing, looking at the safety, at the security, at the safeguards aspects of the plant. In the conviction that if we get this right, this will have some bearing influence in what happens overall.