 Matič Rježnar, v tamo Ralejsko arjas. Matič Rježnar. Vzpeša, da je zelo več čak. Ne. Vzpeša, začne, da se co se možemo spet. Vzpeši smo o nekaj region. Ježim v slavini na sud-eštrije alpine aree s Slovenijem vzpeši alps in panonijem plač, dinaric, neko so nalave. V Sloveniji je zelo krimacija. Srečenje v mladih periodov, z vseh iniolitičnih periodov, ljudičnih srečenja. V srečenju, nekaj nekaj nekaj, vseh srečenja je vsečenja. Miler Karpe vsečenja je vsečenja. Vsečenja je vsečenja, kaj je začne. v njih zelo, da se jaz vse očelje, kaj je načinje vse da se zelo, da se jaz je povijeli svega pravda, to je, da je vse načinje, tako in tudi, da je zelo načinje začelje, kaj je načinje, nekaj, na kaj smo načinjali, s kaj smo načinjali, je se prišli posledno jo, nekaj je dobro, nekaj je, da je nekaj zelo, je to dobro vršt. The culture environment I will not speak on the Urnfield period. I will go on the limit between the Urnfield period and the early iron age. If you look in Slovenija in the early iron age, most of the archaeological groups in Slovenija except the Dolensko region still practices mostly cremation for their population, or in nekaj zelo. Ale bo se v Nortosti Slovenijo, da je prične zelo, prične zelo, in tudi v časnji Iron Age, ali Tumulus je zelo, da je monument, da je zelo, da je vse, pa v svoj počke, da je Poshtela, da se je novinno, v svoj veliko vči vši rovnih. Tudi je to je tega kultura, v izgledu Slovenija, ne bo bilo v detajlji, ali je to, da smo vših, vsega vsega vsega vsega in v veli, vsega v veli, vsega vsega vsega. Svetljenje, vsega vsega, vsega vsega, vsega vsega, vsega vsega, vsega, vsega, vsega vsega vsega vsega, in tudi, smo dobročali tudi vstupne nekaj vseh metarj. Tudi se vsi vseh temelje, kaj je tudi vseh selt, kaj je počet, nekaj je drava in murovali, in toj nekaj je se. Vseh je tudi vseh vseh, in je tudi vseh način, način, kad je tako počet, ali njih bilo vseh sapelemene in tudi vseh, where things not remain the same, but the same locations hold the positions as they are so important. But we will go here to Pustela up there. It's an area which is also in the Ernfield period quite important. Hundreds of graves being excavated all around here. Prv seemo je pogleda v 2009, kar radiokarboni o vso museli povednjenja do vzrinj. Veš, da smo povedal biti od odrbenih nekinih, ko ali se ta prilet borovca. Tako smo uzimniva, glatski, fredni glatski, izgleda baroče. Iron je vzgledat v platih vzgleda, v baroče in so on, so on. So this, let's say, two, three generations, it was quite a colorful period, people probably individually, or groups individually decided how things will go, were they able to get new material in one, they wanted to get new material in and so on. But then we went further, we, with our research, we would try always to get from broader landscapes into narrower contexts. So this is Pustela, the hill fork on the Lidar scan. Beneath we have cremation, we have tumulus cemetery, but also flat cemeteries. Here is one just below Pustela, this flat cremation cemetery, and two groups of tumuli just beneath the early Iron Age hill fork. So we did a lot of geophysics in this area, and one important result we had was at this flat cremation cemetery, it was known by previous research, but only for 15 graves were known, so how was the portion we didn't really know, we did geophysics, as you see here, and there were these dots anomalies which were different as in the other areas we also measured. We excavated that and we found some quite diverse graves, as it was said before, this diversity is quite big. We had problems with our results from the geophysics, so we had to go back, redo these models, model how each of the graves would look like. We measured also when we were excavating susceptibility, so we can compare the data from the excavations with the geophysical, not only the models but the measurements, so we could go again back with the analysis, and in the end we have quite good results, the only grave which we didn't see was here, it was just a shallow pit with a few pieces of charcoal and a few pieces of bone, I mean call that a grave, but yeah. And then in the end we have this view, this cemetery, so from 15 graves we go to over 100 graves, so this is quite a difference if you look from the cultural point of view, so this is quite a large group and on the other side we have around 150 barrels with one individual in each, so we came from 15 to 150 to 100 to 150, which is quite a difference, and again comparing these graves you see they are quite diverse, and if we go then into each individual grave, again this is some of the graves show elaborate rituals going on, because this grave for instance you had first burning on the floor, then one plate was put in, burning again on this plate, and then the grave was constructed on in, and this urn was put inside the grave as you see it here. And then we have other instances, like this grave here we took it also to CT scanning, we did all the excavations, all the lines every one centimeter excavating very slowly, and then doing all the drawings, and again CT of the inside because it's magnetic metamorphic rock and the CT doesn't go through very well, which is what because the urn was like that, and then in the end it was interesting that we found this shirt inside of the of the jug, inside the urn, and in the end it was found out that it comes from the bowl which was broken from the from the pressure of the earth, and it fell into this jug, which means that the jug probably was holding some organic substance, so this thing, this fragment could sink to the bottom of the of the jug, which is quite interesting story, but of course it's one grave, and as this last year it's interesting for us because we found another flat cemetery associated with Poštela, so things changed a little bit more, we excavated only two graves, but geophysics shows there probably more graves again, and we were happy with this last CT, it's just a week old, this is the area where we have the bone material and what is on the top very nicely, it's a pin, and you see I already see the organic thing around, which was pinned through with a pin, so but we're not going too far now because it's just the beginning, and a broken knife, which was on two parts of the above the remains, I will go to another site, Novine, which we did, another hill fort with tumuli all around this ridge, and in this area again a flat cremation cemetery, we excavated this rampart, which is a late Iron Age rampart beneath it was a grave, and another grave, which was here where the tumuli are located, but it was in an area which is on the surface, on the relief it's flat, so it might not be a tumulus, I'm showing this one again because it's so fascinating how these results of the CT scan are important, because this, when we were excavating, we saw bones outside, so we thought it's a ritual, a little bit outside, a little inside, no, these were roots from three, which broke the urn, so you can see very good the roots going through the urn and damaging and pushing out the bone material, which is even more important, this is what we get when we dig it out, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven pieces, we see that on the CT scan all the whole pieces, and we were measuring then, counting that, and as you can see, we have in the CT, we have 34 bones, which are bigger than 8 centimeters, none after excavation, and really it was slow proper excavation, and we did wet sieving of the material, and we had at the end bone dust 280 grams, which of course was something which was broken when we were excavating it, so this is quite important to do the proper analysis, and which is, new windows are of course opening when you do CT scanning, it's the density of the bone, is that's connected to temperature of firing, we were doing experiments in that, but I'm not going into that any further at this moment, again bones from the urn field culture and what we see in the early iron age, although the graves very similar, very similar in the flatlands and here at Pustela, we see in the flatlands quite different burning than here, but I will not go into these tables anymore, because with new methods used, thank you Tamara, we have to throw that away, and now when we play with histology and when we play with FTIR, we see that there are quite some differences, what is the observation, the macroscopic observation, and the measurements doing with other scientific methods, we also did where something occurs in the grave, and we don't have anything like correlation, we have head all around, feet all around, arms all around, torso all around, and then of course pots were not empty where they put them in the graves, what was in the pots, we see sometimes some different earth soil which is on the bottom, but then we made analysis and we see organic remains, we compared the settlement and the cemetery and interestingly that in both of course it's animal and plant remains, but plant then prevails in the cemetery, which means it was, the pots were probably used differently and the amounts of organic remains, lipid and so on found in the pots, it's much, much higher in the settlement than in the cemetery, so not all the pots were used like that, and we did petrography of pottery for Pustela, which means took samples of pots from different parts and we took also clays, so in the end what did we find out, there are differences between settlement when stuff looks more randomly than in the cemetery, and there are some pots in the cemetery which don't occur, some recipes which don't occur in the settlement, and for those we didn't find the source yet, for three of the recipes we did find the source already, and so what holds a cremation grave, my question which I posted in the beginning, we are learning to extract more and more information and by learning, I mean learning is a continuous dynamic process of investigation where the key elements are experience, knowledge, access and relevance, it requires a culture of inquiry and investigation rather than one of response and reporting, thank you for your attention.