 What's good jobs for us back again with another video. So I'm gonna check out reasons why Brock Lesnar will never return to WWE. This should be very interesting. We're going to see what are some of these reasons why Brock won't be able to return to WWE. Obviously Brock has been kind of put into this scandal with Vince McMahon and you know the documents that was released accusing Brock of doing or being a part of Vince McMahon's operation, you know. So we're going to check out what are some of the reasons outside of that one? What are the other potential reasons why Brock won't be able to return? But I appreciate all love support. Let's get right into this one should be a very interesting one. Brock Lesnar, a wrestler fans are no more likely to see in WWE than Vince McMahon. Janelle Grant's lawsuit against Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis and the WWE has already sunk Vince McMahon. The case is barely begun and yet many fans in industry observers believe McMahon was forced to resign from the company just from the severity of the allegations. Now we've reviewed the details of Miss Grant's lawsuit, including the allegations, so we won't get into them here. However, it's worth mentioning that Lesnar isn't being sued. However, an individual believed to be Lesnar, but not confirmed is mentioned as allegedly making remarks that put that person in a bad light. Yeah. In a classic case of damage control, Lesnar seemingly being pulled from WWE events. Lesnar didn't appear at the Royal Rumble to set up a much anticipated program against Gunther WrestleMania. Furthermore, Lesnar's presence on promotional material for WWE 2K24 were scrubbed and his presence in the game was cut substantially back. That's crazy. At the same time, Lesnar is still listed on the WWE roster. Unlike Vince McMahon, who fans have to search for on the WWE's website like they're playing a modified game of Where's Waldo? Despite Lesnar's seeming shadow ban, rumors persist that WWE is reconsidering its decision to ban Lesnar. Like anything in wrestling, it's difficult to tell which rumors have any basis in fact, which are just fabricated. Nevertheless, some of wrestling's more reputable news sources claim there has been a discussion of bringing Lesnar back. Just when is anyone's guess? But let's look at why it might not be a bad idea and why it's probably the worst idea since Vince McMahon returned to WWE in 2022. First, let's look at why WWE should bring Lesnar back. He's still a draw. The biggest reason for a broke return is what makes any sport of b- Oops. Ah, damn. I was not trying to do that. All right. Reason for a broke return is what makes any sport of business turned a blind eye to room and bad behavior. The almighty dollar. Lesnar is still a draw whomever he wrestles. He's lost several high profile matches against Roman Reigns in 2021 and 2022. Arguably one of the worst book series, it didn't lose any momentum. Lesnar is that rare wrestler who will always be pictured as a main event due to his real life reputation as a tough guy and his imposing stature. This is an unimportant quality, especially in an industry where the injury bug can sideline top stars, leaving a promotion with few or no main eventters. Such was the case in 2022 when Lesnar had to wrestle Roman Reigns at SummerSlam after Randy Orton was injured and the WWE had no viable contenders for the tribal chief. They can get a good match out of anyone. Although the Beast isn't known for working long matches with some exceptions here and there, he's known for his ability to work against any style of opponent and put on an entertaining match. Some of this is due to the excitement of seeing Lesnar taking opponents to Sioux Black City and watching them execute big man spots that very few wrestlers can perform. However, as fans saw with Lesnar's matchup WrestleMania 39, Brock got an entertaining match out of almost who isn't a bad worker, but a limited one at that. Not only that, but Lesnar worked on the defensive a side of him fans never saw before. He can still put people over. Not only is Lesnar still a draw, but the WWE with the exception of his series against Roman Reigns knows how to protect him. So he bounces back from the occasional loss. This is vital because Lesnar is at a stage in his career where he does more than just pop a crowd and attract an audience. Under the right circumstances, Lesnar is great at putting rising stars over. Such was the case when Lesnar elevated Cody Rhodes with their best of three series last year. Lesnar's shocking assault on the American nightmare the night after Rhodes' WrestleMania loss to Roman Reigns was brilliant booking as Rhodes needed a high profile program to rebuild the momentum he lost after his surprise. Lost to the head of the table at WrestleMania 39. Rhodes could have worked against the Judgement Day, which he eventually did, but the Lesnar program was ideal for showing just how good a wrestler Rhodes is and just how dangerous Lesnar can be. While Rhodes won the first match, Lesnar quickly broke Rhodes' arm before their rematch and punished Cody there. Rhodes' willingness to wrestle with a broken arm and his spirited comeback at their third deciding match at SummerSlam put aside any doubts that Rhodes was Raw's number one babyface and that his loss to Reigns was just a speed bump on his quest to finishing his story. It's difficult to imagine anyone but Brock helping elevate Cody so much. But why shouldn't WWE bring him back? Well, it's standard procedure to suspend someone. Now aren't people allowed the presumption of innocent until proven guilty? Whether or not the court of public opinion has found Vince McMahon guilty of the allegations made against him, McMahon is presumed innocent until guilty. However, it's common for businesses to put an individual on leave, paid in some cases and unpaid in others, while allegations of misconduct are being investigated. However, in some cases, professional wrestling has released wrestlers after certain allegations, such as domestic violence. In Vince McMahon's case, the WWE faced major sponsors backing out of deals, which many believe is why McMahon decided to resign despite denying all allegations and promising to fight them. In Lesnar's case, the WWE suspending him, even though this hasn't been officially stated, is standard operating procedure. It's hard to deny him being mentioned in the allegations. And it's just one of those things where it's like they gotta play ball too because people are gonna bring up investors and sponsors are gonna bring up. Well, even though his name wasn't mentioned, it's eluded that it's him. So what are we going to do? Because people if Vince is sent packing, but Brock is still on television, people are going to bring that up. Whether he actually did it or not, the dates line up that it's implied that it's him. People are going to bring that up. So they have to just like, hey, we got to sideline you too. They have to. It's not because morally, most likely morally, they don't give a fuck. It's about money, bro. Money talks, bullshit walks. That is a true statement. It's no denying that Lesnar's situation is different than Vince McMahon's. Brock's defenders can argue that Lesnar's current hiatus is a case of guilt by association. Furthermore, they can argue Lesnar isn't even mentioned by name in the allegations. At the same time, it's difficult to deny who the former UFC champion mentioned in the lawsuit is. As we'll see next, the WWE and its legal team have a big reason for wanting to keep Lesnar off WWE TV, as the WWE is being sued. Janelle Grant is not only suing Vince McMahon and Laurinitis, she's suing the WWE. The WWE is being sued because Grant alleges some of WWE officials with power knew about McMahon and Laurinitis' alleged misconduct, yet they did nothing to stop it. A corporation can be sued if a person proves a corporate culture exists that fails to protect employees from misconduct like harassment or other hazardous work conditions. While the WWE can't change what happened in the past, it has to protect itself from future allegations that it knew about individuals engaging in bad behavior and either turned a blind eye or refused to deal with it. Hypothetically speaking, the WWE could put itself in legal jeopardy if it brings Lesnar back without warning to determine if Lesnar was involved in any misconduct. In Lesnar's case, the WWE hasn't officially suspended him, but it's obvious that they're concerned about what could come out in the lawsuit if it pertains to Lesnar. Facts and let's be honest here, bro. If the captain of the ship is doing some wild shit, best believe everyone else, not everyone, but a lot of the crew members, they know. They knew what was going on. They know. If the top guy is on some wild shit, best believe other people know about the wild shit and or maybe participating in it. People just kept their mouth closed. Simple. So that's not a far-fetched idea. Hypothetically, for court determines that Lesnar engaged in misconduct before endeavor merge with WWE, TK will have to dismiss Lesnar. Otherwise, it will be much easier for people to prove the WWE ignores complaints about misconduct should similar lawsuits arise and someone claims the WWE kept predatory individuals around and again, we are speaking hypothetically. It's just a bad look. As mentioned, the court of public opinion holds considerable power over businesses. The WWE found this out when Slim Jim backed out of its sponsorship deal with the company for the Royal Rumble until Vince McMahon's conveniently timed resignation from the company. If the WWE decided for whatever reason to give Brock the benefit of the doubt, you could be sure that the universe would make their displeasure known at any time Lesnar showed up on live television. Even worse, the WWE could face Slim Jim and or other sponsorships deciding to withdraw their deals from WWE until Lesnar is cleared. It's just not in the WWE's best interest to put him on TV. That's that's that's the main reason why we won't see him back on here for a while until it. His name is potentially cleared, which I don't know if it will be, but no, they're not going to do that. They're going to lose money as soon as he's even featured on television. People are going to say something about it on social media. They're going to be hitting up these brands. People will actively find who supports WWE brand-wise and will hit them up about this. The brand's going to hit WWE. What the fuck's going on? Simple as that. That's how this shit works. The WWE has enough star power right now. And why as big as a star as Lesnar is and as much as you can put people over in the WWE, the company continues to create new stars and it's also shown a remarkable ability for restoring wrestlers who slipped out of the main event back into the top with Drew McIntyre being a good example. They also have several superstars the WWE Universe would love to see at the top, including Sami Zayn, Jey Uso, L.A. Knight and even newcomers such as Bron Breaker. If the WWE feels it needs Brock Lesnar back right now that badly, it needs to take a long look at how it's creating stars and promoting its full-time roster. The WWE has many reasons to keep Lesnar away, millions of them with Janelle Grant's lawsuit and unless it wants to open itself up to further damages, he needs to understand that Brock Lesnar can't return to TV. Businesses have never been better and remarkably the WWE is whether the latest Vince McMahon scandal without serious harm. Yeah, bringing Brock back would be a serious blunder and something that just makes no sense. T.G. Holdings area manual should know better and likely does. Emmanuel needs to stop any talk of bringing Lesnar back and focus on maintaining the damage control mode the WWE is in and waiting to see what happens if McMahon's case goes to trial. If Lesnar's identity and the allegations is confirmed, they will have to wait and see if Lesnar engaged in any misconduct. Otherwise, the company is risking future lawsuits, its current sponsorship deals and even loss in his popularity. What do you guys think? Should they don't really need him right now. They WrestleMania is looking good. They have plenty of top stars. They do not need him right now and all you do is bring up the Vince stuff again. You bring him back. You're going to remind people of the Vince stuff and then it's it's we're right back to square one. So no, they're trying to distance themselves from all of that, which is understandable for business to try to do. They don't need them right now. WWE is doing great things with the people they have. And just leave it at that. Is there a possibility he could possibly come back? Maybe, but his name would have to legitimately be removed from that situation legally for it to even possibly happen. But I don't know if that will happen. So comment down below. Let me know. Do y'all feel that Brock should come back at some point or do y'all feel like it's over for him? His career in WWE is done for forever. Let me know down below, but I appreciate all love support. Road to 150K and I'm still here to be the YouTube wrestling champion of the world. Appreciate y'all kicking with me. See y'all next one. Peace.