 Sociophysics' opinion dynamic simulation suggests that agents with conflicting views tend to separate into distinct groups, leading to increased polarization. However, the addition of zealot agents or other mechanisms that push opposing views further apart can exacerbate this phenomenon. To counteract this trend, a universal mathematical framework was developed that incorporated protiversity mechanisms into existing models. This framework enabled the study of the effects of external protiversity contributions on the stability of non-polarized configurations. Two specific examples were presented, including an extension of the classic square geometry eising-like model and a dynamic scale-free network system with two different mechanisms promoting local diversity. Both models showed similarities in results, such as the existence of low-temperature, stable, locally and globally diverse states. Despite the differences between these models, they demonstrated that protiversity mechanisms can be used to create stable, non-polarized configurations. This research provides insight into how to combat the increasing polarization seen in many modern democracies, and opens up a pathway toward developing real-world strategies for depolarization. This article was authored by Powell-Sobkowicz. We are article.tv, links in the description below.