 All right, here's a story that I'm sure is going to make you a date. So in Montana, young environmentalist activists, these are young people, sued the state of Montana, sued them because the young people argued that the state agencies were violating the young people's constitutional right to a clean and healthy environment by allowing fossil fuel development. A judge yesterday ruled in their favor. He ruled that the state has an obligation, an obligation to consider, or has a constitutional obligation to consider a clean and healthy environment for young people. And as a consequence, right, to reevaluate all fossil fuel permits, all fossil fuel permits. It's the first time a U.S. court has ever ruled against a government for violating a constitutional right based on climate change. And now this is a state court, not a federal court. It's based on a state constitution, not the U.S. Constitution. And you know, this is going to be appealed and we will see what happens on appeal. And of course, you know, Montana is a major producer of coal, coal-burned electricity, has large oil and gas reserves that are being exploited. And this is, you know, for now, I think primarily just a big PR stunt. But it is a big deal. This is a big deal. These young people are convinced that they will be convinced by Greta and her pals and her intellectual supporters that they are going to die, their lives are going to be shortened by the use of fossil fuels, and they are demanding that the states protect them. You know, the dean of the Lucid Clark Law School in Portland says, the ruling really provides nothing beyond emotional support for the many cases seeking to establish a public trust right, human right or federal constitutional right to a healthy environment. There is no such right, not in the U.S. Constitution, not that this even our Supreme Court will accept. It's just unbelievable that a judge would rule this way undermining the entire nature of our Constitution, that we have some kind of right to these kind of outcomes. Where would these kids be? Would they even exist? How would their lives, what would their lives be like if we didn't have fossil fuels? They have no conception of that. No conception of that. I was encouraged today, though, to read, oh, I think I just closed that window, to read out of the U.K. like a sub-stack, this is, yeah, here it is, it's a sub-stack. It's the Cliff Fox sub-stack, it's an Academy of Ideas out of the U.K. The title is Extreme Weather, Can We Adapt to a Changing Climate? And his conclusion at the end is, should we spend trillions on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions? Given that economic losses from such events can be enormous, isn't prevention better than cure? Or would that money be better spent on making society more resilient to extreme weather? Does the narrative of climate change catastrophe get in the way of less dramatic measures that can protect people and property? And he's talking about the fires in, among other things, the fires in Hawaii. And the focus of the article is climate deaths are down. We can spend money, not that much money, on preserving human life. And it's actually, and the cost of reducing fossil fuels is just astronomical when we can spend a fraction of that protecting ourselves from, you know, nature, from maybe catastrophic event or bad consequences of climate change. And it's straight out of Alex Epstein, right? I mean, the whole line of reasoning is straight out of Alex Epstein. So here you have an Academy of Ideas, which is kind of a left of center organization in London, in the U.K., hard to identify a left of center. They're very good on free speech, but Cliff Fox, I mean, basically it's a Marxist organization that is good on free speech and anti-woke, but they're Marxist in a sense of class redistribution, state ownership of resources, things like that. So it's really, it's interesting kind of the combination. But here they're taking on climate change. They're taking at least this one right out there is Rob Lawyans, a Alex Epstein approach to climate change. So they are having an impact out there somewhere.