 I think it's all coming together and I hope that it will be very successful. Everyone here has got a positive attitude, I think, and we really want to make sure that the next ITRs are useful, applicable and can be really of use to the world. Well, I think it's a great conference and I think after being away for 24 years from the last one, 1988, I think it's good gathering. I think a lot of change is really happening. I think that we are progressing too slowly. But I understand because we are dealing with very important issues that have a great impact on the telecommunications markets and even on people's lives. I think it's a very good opportunity for member states to come together and to rub minds on some of the issues which are very high, priority on the agenda of the conference. I think that we will have a new treaty, a revised ITRs, that will provide juridical security with the hosts within Compass. We are all hoping that we will find consensus on how to go forward. I think, as the Secretary General mentioned himself, that these should be high-level strategic principles that can be looked at over many years in the future and that will provide a framework for all the member states of the ITU to apply in the future. I think that what we are hoping for is consensus, agreements on the most relevant issues. I haven't seen anyone stop arguing, stop fighting, discussing the point they defend. And for us as a private sector, it's an ideal forum to explain our proposals, to explain our position and to finally reflect on an instrument of this level. I've been through different sessions, the preliminary and others, and we see sometimes going through a difficult situation, trying to get some consensus. Personally, what I'm looking for, what I will expect, is a real appreciation of the need to have investment in broadband infrastructure, particularly in countries like mine. We need a lot of investment in broadband in order to meet all the growing demand for bandwidth. I suppose it depends on the perspective of the person looking in, but as you know, there's been an agreement to broadcast all the plenary sessions and to broadcast the main working group, or the main committee rather, not the working group. So I think that there's certainly been an effort to have more transparency and the ITU by its very nature is pretty transparent because it's unusual to come to an international conference and a treaty discussion between member states and find members of civil society, industry who participate in member state delegations. So I would say that it's quite transparent under the circumstances. I think there's still some transparency because there are debates, some are animated with different opinions that are expressed, but I think that all the countries that are here are free and equal to have an opinion, to have a point of view. I think that as an international organization, ITU has the right to have its own rules. The members, they built those rules, not the Secretary General. And I think that we are operating reasonably well and with the level of transparency appropriates to the circumstances. No, I don't think so. Mainly I'm sure and this is the overall the years that the role of the ITU is to protect the transparency.