 We're going to have a free speech year at Berkeley, in which we are creating multiple opportunities to engage the issue of free speech. As I'm sure everyone in this room knows, the protections that our Constitution affords to free speech are extensive, indeed more extensive than in any other liberal industrialized democracy. That said, that the rights of free speech can often conflict with the values that we hold that both Sharon and Oscar have talked so movingly about, the values of inclusive community. So we're going to have lots of opportunities to talk about those tensions, to figure out as a community where our resources lie for creating strength and resilience both in ourselves as individuals, but also within groups and as a whole community. That said, we have not only an obligation to protect free speech, but an obligation to keep our community safe. So I've been working extensively with the police to plan for any disruptions that might occur. We'll be working with the whole community to create the powerful sense of commitment to this as a nonviolent community. One of the things that we're planning this year is a series of programs that I'm calling currently Point Counterpoint, in which we bring people of sharply divergent views together for a moderated discussion. I think in the university we have to model civil discourse in which people of very, very different opinions talk to each other with respect, argue with each other with respect and civility. We all share outrage, concern, grief about what happened in Charlottesville. We do not want that to happen on our campus. It's an assault on the principles that are fundamental to our democracy, fundamental to the mission of the university. As a faculty member and now in this new role as advisor on sexual violence and sexual harassment, I care very much about the community understanding our commitment to keeping everybody safe and in particular to making the process for investigation and response. If there is an incident as clear and transparent as possible, everyone knows about what's the kind of open secret, you know, the faculty member who harasses students often serially and what we have to do is change the community tolerance of that behavior or the willingness to stay silent. Most of our cuts have already occurred at the end of 1617 and as I said earlier with the goal of preserving faculty experience and student experience. What we can expect is that we will be able to, we may see time delays and how long it takes for us to move paperwork through the system. We're very focused, Paul and I are chairing an efficiency project towards research administration so we really want to focus on moving resources towards administering our contracts and grants. So I think we've managed it well. The hope is that faculty and students will not experience this in their day to day lives.