 What are you leaning toward? I know you have a big game to pick on. I got a big game to pick and we both indicated early on two weeks ago where we were leaning. And I kind of wavered a little bit because I was doing the homework and San Francisco's got a good stout defense that went healthy as among the best defensive teams in the league. And we've seen a history of the Super Bowl where teams that can pressure the quarterback have done well and have been able to shut down the offense. But the more and more I've thought about it, I just think that Kansas City's got the better quarterback. True. I think they've got the overall better team to score when necessary. I go back to what Orlovsky said. He expects a close game. But when the points are needed and a draw, I have more faith that Patrick Mahomes is going to be able to drive his team and get the points when necessary. And basically, you're picking a winner here, right? I mean, the spread's won. So all we're doing is picking a winner. So I like Kansas City. I think they've got the better quarterback. I think they've got the better overall team. And the story just seems to gravitate there, too, right? Andy Reid. I could see him winning and then retiring, finally getting that monkey off of his back. This could be a way to go out. I could totally see that. I don't know. He's got Patrick Mahomes for the next 12 years. Why would he retire? I don't know. He's hurt. He's going to become a male model? No way. Why do you have to go after the guy? That's what's wrong with you. That's not right. That's not right at all. Why did you have to go there? He's a little heavy. Yeah, I mean, that's not the only problem he's got. He's got other problems. He's still he's a tremendous coach. I agree with you. I don't think he'll rush out. How old is Andy? 60? 61 or 62? Yeah, I don't think he's rushing out. And certainly if he loses, he's not. I like San Francisco. I, you know, the football fan and me, who just enjoys watching the game, is sort of pulling for Kansas City, right? I think they are the more fun team. You know, I've been complaining about the 49ers sort of being boring. But they've just looked so solid in the playoffs. And for some reason, I just like this team. I like them on both sides of the ball. And frankly, I wanted to differ from Don. I had a hunch he'd be leaning KC. I said, you know what? I'm fine rolling the dice in San Francisco. I can't sit here and say I have a ton of conviction about the 49ers. What I do have conviction about is it being one of the best Super Bowls we've had in a while. And I'm just excited about the game in general. Now Chris Canty brought up a great point on Humpty Canty and Rothenberg from 10 to 1 on our station. He said that San Francisco, which has a very stout defense, 64% of the time it plays zone. And Patrick Mahomes has the best quarterback rating of any quarterback in football against the zone. So would Robert Salah actually change his entire defense and all of a sudden go man to man? I mean, that'd be a tough thing to do over a two-week span. All of a sudden, change your defensive philosophy to stop a quarterback that eats up zone. And you could do that if you want. But then there's going to be that not knowing exactly how that's going to play itself out. If you play that much zone, it's because you're successful at it. So you're almost playing to maybe the defense's weakness. And maybe that plays into the hands of Kansas City. I brought this up yesterday. The history of the Super Bowl says that good defense has stopped good offenses. We saw the Giants put pressure on Brady. Giants won those two Super Bowls. We saw Denver get shut down when Peyton Manning was still in a lead quarterback. Not the quarterback that eventually won the Super Bowl, that team in New York against Seattle. There was no contest. Seattle was just amazing defensively. But ask yourself, is San Francisco among the great defenses like that Denver defense, like that Baltimore defense, like that giant defense putting pressure on the quarterback? And most of those quarterbacks were pocket guys where pressure is going to make them succumb. Mahomes can buy time. Now a lot of people reacted to what I said on Twitter and said, but what about Denver shutting down Cam Newton? No offense to Cam Newton. I don't know if he's Patrick Mahomes. He's not. He's close, but I don't know if he's Mahomes. That year he was very good. But he wasn't as athletic. He's not the athlete Patrick Mahomes is. And he also didn't look ready for that game, right? He seemed like he was overwhelmed by the moment. Do you see Mahomes being overwhelmed by this moment? It almost feels like he's been meant to be in this moment. And they were knocking on the door the last couple of years, and maybe this is the time where they finally knock it down. They could have been going for two in a row. D4 doesn't line up an inch offside. And now D4 is on the other side with the San Francisco 49ers. Now the 49ers do have a great front four, but they're very fast and not big, but they're very fast. So that maybe could counteract some of the advantage that Mahomes has because of his maneuverability. But those upsets that you talked about, Tom Brady, even Chris Kent, he spoke about this. We knew exactly where he was going to be. He's going to be five feet behind the center in the pocket. Same thing with Peyton Manning. Patrick Mahomes is not going to hang in the pocket if there's going to be any kind of pressure. So I think that could subvert some of the pressure that San Francisco is going to bring. And he just makes so many great plays. He can buy the time to kill you with his arm. And if he scrambles, we saw that against Tennessee. One of the great plays we've seen in the postseason, where he can just bust it for 40 yards, score a touchdown, and nothing's more frustrating for a defense or a fan. You know this for a fact, Peter, being a Redskins fan. You got that team third and long and the quarterback scrambles and just gets out of bounds like a half yard past that line. It frustrates you because you diagnosed it. You figured out the play and then the quarterback's legs buys them a fresh set of downs. I could see that totally happening. Now you're saying I know that it was a Redskins fan because it gets done to me so often. No, I'm saying because you're passionate and you're watching a football to know that when that happens to you, it breaks your back and your heart. And specifically it happened for the Redskins twice in the playoffs against Russell Wilson, where every time you think you have him, he does that. And that is one of the things that'll be a big challenge. One thing they just threw up there on yes, San Francisco is number one against the past though, which will be interesting to see if Kansas City, if it gets shut down in the passing game to some degree, are they capable of really beating them on the run? You would think that game would work towards San Francisco's advantage. Here's one thing I'll also say though, if something freakish happens, let's not forget Patrick Mahomes earlier this year was banged up. And obviously you're certainly not wishing this on anyone, but you never know what happens. It's a football game. If something happens to one of the two starting quarterbacks in their team, in this game, who would be more drastically affected? Matt Moore becoming quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs in the Super Bowl, you would say, and I know we talked about this yesterday with Orlowski, and he mentioned the fact that he was good when he played, or I'm sorry, he was rich eyes and I think, he mentioned that Matt Moore when he had to play the season was pretty good. But let's be honest, this line becomes completely different if Matt Moore is playing in the Super Bowl. Of course, but he is a veteran, so that helps a little bit. Absolutely, but whereas if San Francisco loses Jimmy G, their plan doesn't change that much. You're getting a heavy dose of the run with San Francisco if they're gonna win this game no matter what. It depends though, because you know, you don't wanna start thinking about injury, but if they're down in a couple of scores, maybe the run game isn't something that they're gonna need. I think you gotta throw. That's a big key. They cannot end up down, Orl, they can't get down big. Coming back against KC, the idea of trying to constantly climb against a team who's every, it would be almost like what Green Bay was trying to do with San Francisco. You just cannot climb back against a team like Kansas City. Phenomenal stat I read about today. Kansas City's punter, Colquitt, never punts. He had 45 punts all year. The Jets punter had 95 punts all year. So he's not expecting to punt much and they haven't had to do that. And that's one of the keys. All right, San Francisco is gonna be patient and run the ball, but if every time Kansas City gets the ball they score, it changes the urgency then and you might have to throw a little bit more. And a lot of people think that Jimmy G could do that, that he's not. I mean, they just shut down the passing game because the running game was so good. But if he has to, Jimmy G could play. He could go, yeah. He can, and that's been the topic of conversation. Why did they shut it down? Was it just coincidental that he threw that pick against Minnesota and then they went 70% run? Were they affected by his mistakes? Because I don't think he played particularly well against Minnesota, but the Vikings couldn't take advantage. Or is it, hey, it was working, why should we stop? But I think there's a combination of the two, right? I mean, it all has to start somewhere. We are gonna start running a little bit more. Did they lose a little bit of faith in the quarterback? Because you can't, don't turn it over on Sunday. Don't, the last thing they can do is give Kansas City extra possessions. You know, I don't think it's, you're gonna have to go score for score. I think San Francisco's defense is too good for that. But I don't think it's good enough to overcome turnovers, short fields. You give that to Kansas City, you're dead. I also,