 My name is Lieutenant Colonel Les Nondgrass. I'm the Chief of the Architecture Evaluation Branch. We're a new branch at that's being stood up at Nellis Air Force Base under the Chief Architect Office out of Department of Air Force at the Pentagon. AD-5 is the architecture demonstration event, 5. It's actually broken into two phases, 5.1 and 5.2. 5.1 was performed already under an evaluation called Guide 3. 5.2 is what we're currently evaluating now under PAC-Iron with PAC-AF here at Hickam Air Force Base. We have teams forward at Guam and our Chief Architect team out there is evaluating the tactical communications and how they're going as part of this exercise of the PAC-Iron exercise. The team here at Hickam is observing more of the operational, how orders get created, how they're disseminated out to the field, and then observing those the feedback from the field, whether those communications were effective or not, and then getting into the daily flow of the operation. The importance of AD-E is we're evaluating gaps in architectures. Specifically, this one 5.1 or 5.2 was looking at agile combat employment and so the communications out at Osteer airfields using like a hub and spoke architecture and how resilient those those that employment is. What we hope to gain out of ADE 5.2 is demonstrating this agile combat employment. We've got to demonstrate the comms. You know, we're not at a big base with the infrastructure. We've got to demonstrate the ability to command and control forces out at these Osteer airfields, but that also includes getting support out there. You know, and then the easiest thing to think of is gasoline or fuel for the aircraft, but all the support that goes with just having people out in an Osteer location. So we're hoping to demonstrate that in an effective way, and this is kind of a baby step to then, in the future, demonstrate it in a larger exercise. I think this exercise is going really well. We have identified, of course, we've identified gaps. That's why you do exercises. We've had some difficulty with the weather, but again, you're going to have that in real world, and that's one of the factors we would want to simulate or exercise. The communications from Hickam out to the field have gone well, and they've been executing sorties and had a good sortie generation rate. So I would say overall it's been very effective. We've identified some gaps that we are going to work on for future, but again, that's how we learn and how we grow. I think the thing that's important for people to know is that this is a, it's a process. It's an iterative process in that we're getting after agile combat employment in this exercise and information dominance. However, we're going to take the lessons we learned from this, and we're going to make it better, and we're going to do it again in the future.