 So why is it important that more women and people from a diversity of backgrounds are included in and contribute to Wikipedia? Well, those who contribute help to shape its content that we now all rely on. So it's important that it represents all of us. Let me explain. Wikipedia is open source, so its content is used in lots of different ways across the web, like in the info box that you see on the right when you do a Google search. You can see it's drawing that summary information straight from Wikipedia. And if you are Siri or Alexa, a question for example, there's a good chance that some of that information is also being drawn straight from Wikipedia. So it's important that the content is accurate and of a high quality, but also that it reflects the diversity of our society. But unfortunately, this is not always the case. Currently, only roughly one in 10 Wikipedia editors identifies female. The majority are male, white, straight and from the global north and mostly English speaking as well. This affects the kind of content that's being written on Wikipedia. It creates a kind of bias that then permeates out across the internet. And an example of that is that only 20% of all biographies on English Wikipedia are actually about women. And that's even worse for gender diverse folks or people of underrepresented backgrounds as well. Bias shows in the language that we use too. For example, the woman is often described as a socialite or a wife, as opposed to an entrepreneur or a business person, which is the language that we might find use for a man on Wikipedia. So it's critically important that we broaden who is contributing to Wikipedia and we don't just need them editing content about women, we need them editing all kinds of content because the more diversity of editors there are on Wikipedia, the better and more equitable the content will be.