 The concept of social system is considered as the masterpiece of Parsons' conception of social order. Here defines it as, Social system is the most basic setting having different roles in which interactions occur among the occupants of these roles. These interactions are controlled or regulated by the normative rules of conduct, mainly imposed out of broader cultural settings of social systems. The most important and interesting commentary on Parsons social system is in Oram's book. Oram has explained the concept of Parsons social system in a very interesting way. Basically, in every society, in every social system, people have roles. Each one has its own character, its own role. If these roles are properly distributed and people perform their roles, and who will conduct these roles? The normative rules conduct by the broader cultural settings. The most dominant factor in every society is the norms and values of the society that are created by the culture. The existing practices determine the values of the society. The whole social system operates under the norms and values, in which the role will be performed properly. But who will conduct the check? It will be the normative values. That is, in every society, you don't just work with the rules of conduct, but your values and your existing standards are also looking at how you perform your roles. So, the social system of Parsons is about boundaries and environment. Boundaries and environment means that there are some checks and balances on every role. And the overall environment of the society basically creates the same standards in which everyone's behavior suits that environment or creates a clash in that environment. Because wherever there are social structures, what are they based on? They are values, norms, collectivity, and some roles. And who does all this link with? It links with the social process in which pattern maintenance is done, integration is done, goal attainment is done, and goal adoption is done. So, what does this mean? It means that there is a whole atmosphere in which things go along with the hierarchical structure. Now, in the hierarchical structure, every person is responsible for their work. If someone stays in their limits and follows their boundaries, then they won't let their environment get damaged. Because what is the responsibility of the environment? What is the responsibility of the environment in which every person's character, even his own character, responsibilities, responsibilities can be achieved. If all this is going on in the right way, then obviously the social system will go on properly. But if those boundaries are not maintained, then what will be the first thing that will get damaged? That will be overall environment damage. Under which the social system won't be able to run under influence, and the social order will be disturbed. This means that the social process, the responsibility of its functioning is on all those people who have specific roles, which are assigned to them. If they properly arrange their assigned roles, if they don't violate their responsibilities, then the social order won't be disturbed. The social process will also go on. Along with that, the overall environment, which is basically managing all these things, that environment won't be damaged. The social system by Talcott-Parson, it is such an idealistic framework for any kind of society. But definitely there are many issues in every society that how people can maintain all their responsibilities without disturbing the other ones. Because it is human nature to gain more power, to gain more important status. So Talcott-Parson's image is abstract and idealistic in its nature.