 You mentioned the industry and there's lots of changes now in the translation industry in general. I know you're following them very closely as an expert and as a person very interested in the use of technology in translation and in audiovisual translation especially. So we've been seeing in the recent years lots of language technologies being used in audiovisual translation such as machine translation and new features in self-diting software the use of translation memories and so on. We're now seeing there is a large language models being introduced by big companies that will surely also be at some point used in many different ways by companies in the industry. They are surely already working on using these in their workflows. How all these advancements in technology affects the need for certification in subtitling. I love technologies and the reason why I do is because I see their application in my daily life because they make my life easier. I use automatic speech recognition on a daily basis. It's so advanced that I rarely type myself. I dictate mostly everything and I would like to see a subtitling editor that gives me this kind of freedom this level of intimacy with a machine. Let's clarify some concepts first. So I think that there's been a lot of discussions about machine translation being a problem. I don't think it's a problem in itself. Nor is artificial intelligence. The problem is what you do with them. The ethics attached to it. If a company decides that from tomorrow my subtitles will only operate with AI tools I am imposing a model. And maybe as an LSP I'm not even qualified to know if it's efficient for my workflow or not. And maybe I will regret my decision because I will be criticized for the awful quality that I produce. I think the professionals need to be trained and trusted. Meaning that if I as a company if I trust my subtitles to be able to use AI tools and they use it when it's appropriate. I believe that that's when we will see a kind of change. The real shift from subtitles to augmented subtitles. Shall we call them like this? Because professional one resists the change as it's happening now but in the professional world the profession itself will evolve nicely. However LSPs cannot use this as an excuse to lower rate. It's not ethical and it doesn't work. Back to your question I think that a certification will serve this purpose to progressively acknowledge this technological innovations include them in newer versions of the certification making sure that an augmented subtitler is the one that aside from all those skills we talked about is also aware and can master this new technologies as well.