 Without further ado all, this is Kofi from the Philippines, and I hope you hear me clearly. So my sharing would be on the sustainability and reliability of legal empowerment initiatives in the Philippines. So this initiative is called this as Community Paralegalty for the Fairfoot Organization. This is empowering the natural communities, the indigenous people, upland and rural farmers on legal aspects of asserting their rights to their land, to their actual territories, to their rights and livelihoods. The creation of the CPLT or the Community Paralegalty, Fairfoot Lawyers, had a very positive effect on the assertion of community rights, strengthening the community advocacy and deepening the ownership and understanding by the communities on the legal basis. This likewise has a positive impact on governance, and it creates an enabling environment for communities to assert their rights, to govern their institution, and they can use them to capture that process to prevent that. I'll just go through. These are the two key cases, Subhanian in Mindanao and Anish Lagan. Anish Lagan is the community farmer or rural farmer, and Subhanian tribes are indigenous people in Mindanao. These Community Paralegalty are just training for the 19th, just training on affidavit gathering, the lawyers, interviews, purchases, gather documents, training the women and youth, documentation, and so on, including campaign planning, including the 18th press releases, and other tasks as a paralegal, meaning they will assist the lawyers other than doing legal work that can be done by the community or the community members themselves. So the overall resource of this Community Paralegalty, deepening the ownership of the community in designing their legal strategies, partnerships in terms of crafting their own strategies and understanding by the community of their own legal treatment. Not only the type of the lawyer, but even the community will understand their legal treatment. This has a positive effect on the aspiration of community rights in strengthening their community advocacy, the community legal program, and its work to enable the community to convert their positive treatment of their family. Legal cases become an arena, not only for lawyers, but tools which the community understood, supported, and owned. The legal intervention became an opportunity for participation and capacity. The Community Paralegalty were able to provide help in past finding missions, concerning violence and illegal demolition, since the CPLP, or the Fairfoot Lawyers, are more familiar with the local landscape, the local dialects, which are helpful in conducting the past finding missions. The Collegiate Data conducted interviews, served as translators to local people, to media, international digital, and other support groups. They provided follow-up interviews, they gathered for report submissions to government agencies. For sustainability and stability, the second-liners used the men and women who were trained by the pioneers. Since most of the case studies that I shared are stories and strategies, legal interventions of the communities who've been struggling to defend their rights in the last 20 years, in the case of the subordinate flag that's already more than 20 years, an indication of, and this, again, I showed this earlier, already more than 10 years. So they trained the second-liners, the women men, and they used, in order to continue the assertion of their rights in defending their land. The second one is mentoring, coaching by the pioneers of the paralegal work. The third one is hands-on and actual exposures to meetings. So handling meetings, meeting with the government agencies, visiting government agencies and repress files, media, hopping, like radio business, to be a good speaker. The fourth one is attendance invitation by non-government organizations on policy briefing, round table discussion on new laws and policy cases so that they will be updated with new policy plans, to send new flags to the issues and other dynamics. So sometimes they attend and they are invited to hold or policy briefing from supporters. Sustainability also, well, some of the communities by communities were inspired by the initiative of that community, so they replicated. So that would expand in terms of resource defense of the community. Another one is skills enhancement from supporters, while they have already trained by the local paralegas that they also accepted or accepted the invitation from others to enhance the existing skills in terms of campaigns, legal research, handling campaigns for conducting media and media activities. And the last one that I wrote is developing local and community-friendly paralegal modules so in order to sustain the initiative and the good practices to become a modules in order for the second liners or third liners to help in sustain their initiative. So that's all from the Philippines experience.