 shared their knowledge and also their known friends or resource persons. We requested Justice Avi Chandrasekhar to trigger off what we say the entire show for the second webinar series. And in the next session next Sunday we will be having Justice N. Kumar on again from Karnataka High Court to speak on amendments in civil law as well as on the arbitration. So these series I hope that it will continue to enrich the public at large not only in India but beyond this digital space can be occupied anywhere and especially once we are live like on the Facebook YouTube. And since we started the second session in this we have knowledge partners with us National Law University, Sonipath coupled with Sadgme which is also a brainchild of a lot of professionals. And when we can Mr. Manish Lamba who is heading along with that Sadgme we all said why not share it. And those who have been connected on the free base webinars they know that Professor Vinay Kapoor where our device chancellor of National Law University is always motivating people at large so that the knowledge could be shared and we also have Professor Amit Guladia from the National Law University. Normally we don't take much time and introduce in this thing but it is only that since we have come back after a session. And Justice Avi Chandrasekhar all those who have been connected with us and otherwise those who have connected for the first time needs no introduction as such. I would first of all in my own words can say that he's not only an avid reader but an avid speaker coupled with the way he shares his knowledge is also quite fascinating. And therefore we took a topic which normally as a student of law or a professional we feel that section 151 or 482 of CRPC are such inherent that what you can or article 226 for that matter that you can ask plead anything wherever you feel that there is no specific section provided under the law as such but is it so or these are the paths which have not been expressly provided under the civil procedure since we are talking of section 151 or it is under section 151 it is only to do what is right and undo what is wrong or section 151 we can say it's not a substantive provision as such but how are these discretionary powers and what are the channels in which it can be channelized when we were discussing and requested Justice Avi Chandrasekhar when we discussed upon section 151 the normal expression which came to the team of beyond law CLC was that section 151 what else can be spoken they say whatever you could not do just write it on 151 but gradually when we explored it we found that itself it's a quite fascinating topic and sorry for the breach of time what we've taken today which normally we don't do and we also promise we will not do that but since it is the second season therefore we've reached that particular time timeline without taking much time I request Justice Avi Chandrasekhar to take things forward oh dear sir and thank you for what we say to trigger off the things and we are quite sure Anjam is the conclusion that we do not know when these series will continue but we are quite hopeful that it will continue to laterality as it normally said that Anjam would be better than Agha if the things begin at a good note the conclusion would always be good over to you sir sir I'll just check out Justice Chandrasekhar as to whether he is in the I think he is logged out I'm just checking it out sorry for the inconvenience I think he will be logging in soon yes sir you can unmute yourself sir unmute yourself unmute yes sir yes sir so as they all say that even in the good programs there's a commercial break but we didn't go for a commercial break but we thought that there should be a break so that we start with the right momentum of the right things oh dear sir thank you thank you Mr. Chhatrat in the beginning I would like to congratulate Mr. Vikas Chhatrat for this wonderful arrangement made for dissemination of knowledge and experience to those who really though to those who are really in need of it it's very difficult for a busy practitioner the two in a place like Chandigarh to spare time with the sole intention of helping the brethren in the profession these are days when people only many people think of personal benefits there is a lawyer who has been making all efforts to provide knowledge and experience especially to the younger generation in the profession friends section 151 of civil procedure court is a an eloquent provision in the sense that it helps the court to do justice between the parties to do justice between the parties there must not be any other substantive provision and then only section 151 can be invoked on a plain reading of section 151 of CPC it is clear that it is not conferred on the courts the power is not conferred on the court civil courts but it is in recognition of the power inherent in the civil court for example please read section 151 of CPC nothing in this court shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court you had a wonderful session from Mr. Sandesh Chautha senior advocate of Karnataka High Court about these dynamics and dimensions of section 482 of CRPC vis-a-vis the width and breadth of article 226 of the constitution of India to deal with such matters in criminal cases section 151 of CPC and a plain reading makes it clear that it is a power inherent in the court and therefore it can be exercised by the presiding officer of the court to do justice between the parties are to avoid abuse of the process of the court court of civil procedure as all of know is not exhaustive any court as a matter of fact be it civil procedure code or criminal procedure code one cannot expect it to be exhaustive wherever gray areas are found and wherever no substantive provisions are found definitely the court can step in to avoid injustice so far as the power to be exercised under section 482 of CRPC it is not within the purview of the court subordinate to the high court but whereas even the even a civil court at the cutting edge like the court of civil judge or a senior civil judge has the power to exercise the power vested in it under section 151 of CRPC one cannot expect legislature to make provision for all contingencies even after meticulous calculation the drafting people may find it difficult to pursue some occasions therefore section 151 of CPC comes into the aid for example I was just going through order 18 rule 17 a of CPC earlier that order 18 rule 17 a has been omitted with effect from 17 2002 what was the power 18 rule 17 yes states like this where a party satisfies the court that after the exercise of due diligence any evidence was not within his knowledge there could not be produced by him at the time when that party was leading his evidence the court may permit that party to produce that evidence at a later stage on search terms as may appear it to be just so now all of you know order 17 and order 18 has to demanded with effect from 17 2002 the intention of the legislature is to see that all evidence must be produced when the party leads leads his or her evidence initially no further evidence on whatever ground be allowed but still let us assume in an extraordinary case a party has some evidence which he had no knowledge at all and that has a great bearing on the case and that parties have already led dividends then in the light of striking off or deletion of order 18 rule 17 a according to me section 151 of civil procedure court can be invoked by the judge order 18 rule 17 it's a the court may recall and examine any witness what does it say the court may at any stage of the suit recall any witness who has been examined and may put such questions to him as the court thinks it fit this is almost equivalent to the power vested in a court either civil or criminal under section 165 of the evidence act the court may at any stage of the proceedings can put any questions to any party whether relevant or irrelevant pertinent or impertinent and may also examine many witnesses and may also call ask for production of documents so the power vested under section 165 of CRPC is almost equivalent to the powers found in rule 17 of order 18 of CPC in the light of deletion of an important provision like the order 18 rule 17 a still the court cannot be said to have no power at all in exceptional cases the court can invoke section 151 of CPC and allow your party to lead evidence which he had no knowledge knowledge of the same when he started commenced his evidence or closed his evidence so I have just given a background of this scope of section 151 with the deletion of rule 17 a of order 18 from this statute friends all of you know very well there are there are there are good number of provisions found in this procedure a loss will procedure code for example if a party wants an injunction temporary injunction order 39 rule order 39 provides for the same if a party wants appointment of a commissioner order 26 rule 9 or an expert is required order 26 rule 10 a if a party wants an adjournment the same is found in order 17 and 18 the manner of recording evidence is found in order 18 of CPC the manner in which an application is to be filed under section 92 of CPC with regard to a scheme suit so many substantive provisions are found in code of civil procedure though it is a procedural law if you see the provisions of the civil procedure code there virtually most of them are substantive in nature you if you go through the provisions of CPC more and more provisions are added and deletions are very few the structuring of the code of civil procedure is a wonderful structure with all this there are some inadequacies and for which the legislators could not have visualized and therefore section 151 comes into picture the the theoretical aspect of section 151 can be summarized as follows inherent powers of a court or complementary to the power of the courts set out in the code of civil procedure and relates to the procedure if the if the ordinary rules of procedure resulting in justice and there is no other remedy they can be broken in order to achieve the ends of justice and equity to demand so demand the power vested in the court being wide in scope and epic what does it mean the at the ends at the hands of the court nobody should be unnecessarily prejudiced the doctrine of finality is applicable to all orders and judgments but there is an exception when this doctrine of finality is not applicable four conditions are very important proceedings culminating in order or judgment suffers from lack of jurisdiction then doctrine of finality is not applicable if an order or judgment is obtained by a party by playing fraud on the court or by misrepresentation of facts and there has been a mistake by the court prejudicing a party and because as I have already explained no party should be prejudiced by a court unnecessarily a judgment or order has been rendered in ignorance of the fact that a necessary party had not been served or had died and estate was not represented so to attract the doctrine of finality these four conditions are very important for example explaining the fourth condition for example let us assume that in a partition suit one of the parties who is a necessary party is not served there is a wrong entry in the order sheet that second defendant is Julie sir he is called out absent all right the judgment is pronounced after recording evidence neither the parties nor their counsel the parties who are represent being represented before the court by their counsel do not point out this glaring defect to the court and the court proceed to pass the judgment and ultimately after the pronouncement of the judgment it is made known to the court sir by mistake defendant number two is actually not served but there is an order treating him as Julie sir and placing him ex-party is a necessary party is not a proper is not just a proper party is a necessary party as all of you know necessary party is one in whose absence no effective decree could be passed a party who has a right in the schedule property to get an appropriate share or can oppose the suit of the plaintiff effectively and if he is not served and there is an order by the court deeming to have been served and ultimately it is brought to the court courts notice even after the judgment is pronounced the court has the power to recall that judgment because it has come it has not noticed this vital aspect because this could be a ground in the appeal by the contesting parties and on that ground alone the appeal can be allowed and demanded to the trial court in order to avoid that an opportunity the the court has to rectify its mistake prints the supreme court in one of the important judgments decisions reported in year 1976 supreme court page 1152 namah of gunge sugar mills versus union of india as held as follows inherent power has roots in necessity and breadth co exists with necessity I think we cannot expect a more eloquent elucidation of section 100 of the scope of section 151 of CPC see what is held by the honorable supreme court in monoharlal versus said here all all yeah yeah 1962 sc 527 is that inherent power has not been conferred on the court it is a power inherent in the court by virtue of its duty to just do justice between the parties before it as all of you know one of the highest duty of all the courts is to take care that the action of the court does not mean merely the act of primary court or any intermediate court of appeal but the act of the court as a whole from the lowest court which entertains jurisdiction for the matters up to the highest court which finally disposes of the case what does it mean what does this elucidation of section 151 mean means not only the court at the cutting edge which has disposed of the matter even the appellate courts in the lost appellate court is also entitled to make use of the powers vested in it under section 151 of CR CPC it means that not only the trial court but also the appellate courts in the hierarchy inclusive of the lost appellate court is also entitled to make use of this extraordinary power discretionary power vested in it under section 151 of CPC then the question comes is as all of you know many of you are practicing in rate courts also invoking the provisions of article 226 of the constitution then there also section 151 is invariably invoked by the practice and the courts also while giving relief what does it say the rate court has the power to review an order passed in a petition under article 226 of the constitution court can modify this so the court can modify this is found in AIR 1962 Supreme Court 1909 Shude versus state of Punjab so the only inhibition to exercise the power under section 151 is that the court must be cautious to see that there are no other substantive provisions of law to do justice between the parties only in the absence of any substantive law or any procedural law in CRPC then only section 151 can be invoked so how what are the what is the under what situation section 151 can be invoked you know just you can go through the provisions of 151 in any commentary you will find do send don'ts for example to consolidate suits and appeals even without the considered consent of the parties for example let us assume that there is one suit between the same parties with respect to the same scheduled property for the relief of injunction let us also assume that between the same parties there is a subsequent suit filed for the comprehensive relief of declaration of injunction and possession parties are same schedule is same here in this though in the subsequent suit the comprehensive relief of declaration of titan and possession is sought the earlier suit though filed for injunction will have to be clubbed together to hold a joint trial and to dispose of the same by means of a common judgment let us assume that in the in the Bangalore city one suit for injunction is filed and it is assigned to court hall a and another suit filed for the same relief between the same parties is also filed and assigned to court hall b then there are chances of verdicts which may which may not be consistent with the pleadings consistent with the schedule property so in order to avoid see this divergent opinions the court has the power see what then what procedure will be adopted a petition under section 24 of court of civil procedure will be filed before the principal city civil judge with a request to say withdraw and transfer suit in court hall number a to court hall number b or vice versa all right that relief will be given section 24 does not speak of any consolidation of suits or appeals and joint trial it only speaks of the power vested in the principal city civil jet principal district judge or principal city civil judge or the high court as the case may be to withdraw a particular civil proceeding and transfer it to same to the other court so then separate application will have to be filed before the court to which a suit or proceeding is transferred with a request to club the same to hold a common trial and to dispose of the same by means of a common judgment less there would be divergent findings in order to avoid this divergent findings in respect of the litigation between the parties pertaining to the same property consolidation of suits or proceedings is absolutely required you know second one is you know order 17 of cpc provides for adjourning a case of course there are several restrictions for granting an adjournment okay the court grants an adjournment but the party feels that the case will have to be advanced there is no provision in cpc so the court which has the power to adjourn a case has the power to advance the case and for this the court can invoke will have to invoke section 151 of the code of civil procedure then recalling witnesses though order 17 of rule 17 of order 18 provides the court to recall any witness and put any questions in the light of deletion of rule 17 a and in the light of the scope of rule 17 of order 18 also the party can invoke for recalling of a witness for further examination or cross examination as the case may be and seen many cases where the monetary reliefs are sacked certain times there will be a prayer for granting installments so depending upon the factions circumstances of the case the court many a times grants installments so where is that power the power is vested in the court under section 151 of cpc to provide for installments with a view to do justice between the parties see for example in a suit for partition there is a lady she is a widow or she is out of the position of the property it takes long time for the suit to be disposed of or the hierarchical courts to take up and dispose of the case if she files an application for an interim maintenance and she is entitled the court has got the power under section 151 of cpc to grant interim maintenance similarly recalling invoke invalid orders order which are which are not at all valid in any manner of course they can be they can be questioned any interlocutory application unless they are provided for an appeal under order 41 43 of cpc they can be definitely questioned by way of a petition under article 227 of the civil procedure court but if prime of a seat appears to be an invalid order the court can recall such order then reconstruction of records when they are lost as a judge of the city civil court we had an opportunity to see that entire case papers had been lost of course evidence had not yet commenced and I had ordered for reconstruction of the entire case file on the basis of the pleading copies of the pleadings maintained by the parties and the copies of the documents and it provides for reconstruction of the case when it is shown that the records are lost suppose court fee is paid in excess of what is to be paid in accordance with law the court has the power to refund the excess of court fee paid by the party similarly order for disclosure of legal representatives of the deceased for example a is the plaintiff b is the defendant b dies during the pendency the suit so on rod 22 of cpc a files an application to bring the l r's of the defendant and he and he mentions that c is the son of and he is the legal representative notice his issue to see and c states that the application is not maintainable since all the legal representatives of my father are not brought on record let us assume that he does not know who are the legal representatives he did not know the names addresses and other details then under such circumstances he can invoke section 151 of cpc by which the court can direct the other the the legal representative who is sought to be brought on record that he see to disclose the names and details of other legal representatives because it is the power of the court to do that all it is the duty of the court to see that all the legal representatives are on or brought on record and the estate is only represented in order to do that if plaintiff is unable to collect the same court has got the power to direct see to furnish the details names details and other requisite particulars of legal representatives and thereby enable a to bring all of them otherwise the contention would be raised that the suit is bad for non-joined or unnecessary parties even otherwise under order one rule 10 2 of cpc the court has got power on its own even without being an application mood to add parties to delete parties to transpose parties but still section 151 of cpc comes to the aid of such parties then the power the court has the power the appellate court has the power to stay the preliminary decree restoration of an execution dismissed for default for example let us let us say that an execution is dismissed for default let us assume that 12 years has already expired from the date of drawing of the decree is legally prohibited from bringing another execution petition what should be his position he can still invoke section 151 of cpc and request the court to set aside the order of dismissal of the execution petition if it is found to be found if it is a case is made out definitely the court will have to set aside that order of dismissal irrespective of the fact whether it it is it has expired the time has expired or not because let us assume that in an execution petition all steps are taken only for small thing it is dismissed for default so in order to start afresh the court will be justified in exercising power under section 151 of cpc to restore that dismissed execution similar is let us assume that an application is filed under order 9 rule 9 of cpc or 9 rule 13 of cpc to set aside the order of expiry and that if and if such applications are dismissed for revival of such applications for restoration of such applications section 151 can be invoked now one important aspect that is about a judgment or order obtained from a civil court or an appellate court by playing fraud on the court or by misrepresentation of facts normally an appeal is provided this could be one of the grounds the party who is agreed can very well urge that the judgment was obtained by playing fraud on the court or by misrepresentation of facts but if it if a clear case is made out of a party obtaining judgment or order by playing fraud on the court or by clear misrepresentation of facts the court is not without any power court has the power under section 151 of cpc to set aside such type of judgment or orders and this is what is clearly held uh retreated by the supreme court in changavarallan aidu case yeah yeah 1950 to 1994 supreme court won now a party has obtained a temporary injunction expartee temporary injunction is made absolute but he is not able to reap the fruits of the temporary injunction the opposite party is obstructing him from enjoying the benefits given to him by the court under order 13 i do 1 and 2 of cpc so the court has power to direct the police to give protection police protection in such cases and for example in execution also we find across we come across cases in which to effectively execute an execution execute a decree uh obtained for possession somebody may be abstract abstracting so to remove obstruction the executing court has got the power to direct the jurisdictional police to render all help for achieving the objects of the decree granted by the court so let us assume that in a motor vehicles accident case somebody is seriously injured is too poor to bear the expenses medical expenses immediately let us assume that a poor man is run over by a motor vehicle as a result of which he has sustained severe orthopedic injuries and neurological injuries and he requires immediate medical attention he may not be able to wait till an award is fast after recording the evidence or he may be too poor to bear the expenses it is under such circumstances i think the motor vehicle accidents tribunal has the power to exercise section 101 of cpc though all this statutory tribunals cannot invoke section 151 because some statutes some special statutes will have designed their own mechanism to do to achieve justice but in such circumstances the motor vehicles tribunal can definitely invoke step in and help the party then the many a times you see some remarks will be made in the judgment against a judicial officer who has disposed of the judgment let us assume that the judicial officer of a civil judge court has made some observation has passed a decree the appellate court finds that the decree is not in consonance with and it also comes to the conclusion that the manner in which the judgment is rendered is incorrect and during the course of the judgment by the appellate court some remarks may have been made what the supreme court states is that nothing should be no remark should be made without giving an opportunity and therefore for expunging such remarks the application the such judicial officer can definitely make an application under section 151 of cpc and to expunge that remark similar is the case if some uncalled for remarks are made against the parties also and it impinges his creditworthiness also and the court has the power to expunge such remarks see section 92 of cpc as all of you know it's a special provision for scheme suit and under section 151 of cpc the court which has framed the scheme can also modify for a better advantage of the parties and the beneficiaries as already retreated by me inherent power cannot be invoked to reopen the settled matters the powers cannot be resorted when there are specific provisions of law to deal with situation i have already told you about the four important aspects to apply the doctrine of finality so if those four conditions are not complied with then the doctrine of finality will not be applicable so even decree can be amended provided there are arithmetical mistakes with regard to calculation grammatical mistakes though section 152 is also a provision but the court has inherent power to correct such mistakes the court has got the power to correct its own mistake because the principal in such cases is that court's own mistake should not be allowed to survive to cause injustice this is the basis for execute for invoking the provisions of section 151 of cpc so let us assume that under order 21 rule 94 of cpc a sale certificate is issued and if there are some mistakes with regard to the description of the property then also the court can correct the same if fraud is played on the court and a sale is held then that can be set aside similarly if a compromise is brought out by fraud it can also be set aside because as you know if a decree is drawn on compromise no separate suit shall lie the court has immense power under section 151 of cpc to punish a party for disobedience to an order of the court friends lot of decisions are there in the commentary appended to section 151 of cpc if one were to look into those case laws it is clear that section 151 of cpc is an important provision vested in the civil in the civil court not vested it is inherent in the in such civil courts and they can be definitely and it can be definitely invoked similarly there are some areas where the court is not expected to invoke section 151 of cpc and the principles themselves disclose that when there are specific provisions of law deal with the situation section 151 of cpc cannot be invoked if you have any questions I can definitely share my experience with all of you yes sir this is by Ayushi Mishra can the income tax returns of the defendant be called from the IT department under section 151 in the interest of justice no no I do not friends I don't know what exactly is the prohibition found in the income tax act for calling for such records but if say what happens is as under section 114 g of the evidence act let us assume that the witness has given a statement before the court deposed that he would on the next date of hearing furnish his income tax returns to prove his case if it doesn't produce on his own then an adverse inference can be drawn under section 114 g of the evidence act but if normally privacy will be added I don't know what exactly is the inhibition found in the income tax act so let's I will make it more clear he let's assume they want an Ayushi would like to say that can any authority who is not a party can an application be moved under section 151 of the cpc to state their end up the records from that particular department we called for no no other than parties to a proceeding nobody is entitled to summoning of the summoning of the official reports meaning the way she wants to say summoning of the official records yeah she says can you use that power under 151 though that particular party is not a party in that particular case I'm making it very clear if one of the parties makes such an application to summon records from such an income tax authority I don't know what exactly is the inhibition so I'm saying let's let's even brush aside its income tax department any other department let's assume there's a dispute of a land title it has power it has power because ultimately it has to do justice between the parties let us assume that in a in a in a suit for maintenance filed by wife agonist husband she said that my husband has seven acres of land she has to prove she is a rustic villager then she can move an application under section 151 of cpc directing the jurist directional village accountant to furnish information as to whether the respondent has village has some lands in villages he will verify records and we'll have to submit this is the animation can the court on its own rectify or recall order under section 151 in any criminal case 151 no criminal for criminal case 151 is of cpc is not at all applicable court can't do it that is what is 482 court court and even in that case the supreme court says that in Harissingman that you can't there's a no recalling power under this correct correct correct correct correct this is by Dr. Dr. Dhanesh is it possible to invoke section 151 cpc yes to reopen the already disposed of contempt petition on the ground that the contempioner has not complied the order with the order of this of the court then see see the the the contempt petition itself will be for sir compliance you know he wants to say okay let us assume that he will he or she is directed to comply within such and such a time then there is no other go no new petition would be filed like they can file a new petition say that saying that it is not complied without the original application itself could be revived you know that is for you can always whether it is the criminal contempt or a civil contempt civil civil in a civil contempt I will say that you can always move an application for recalling of the correct correct calling of the order with variant because per se the court which has passed an order has all the power to execute it you know say even in execution petition the court need not wait for a party to file an application for execution it can execute on its own but in the contempt they can always move an application the article 215 of the constitution of India yes yes because that is a more preliminary and if it is supreme court 129 correct then this is by if during the pendency of a red petition under article 226 the supreme court passes a judgment that covers the fact can an application be filed for seeking direction 151 for disposing of the matter in the same terms the rate under 226 is pending before the high court yes that can be done there is one important difference see article 226 has lot of its powers are wide and broad you know so therefore that's a power vested in the it's a discretionary power nothing comes in the way of the red court to see that it intrams its interim orders are executed and section 151 definitely comes to aid coupled with just additional power what I gather sir the law is to the fact that let's assume there is a specific provision then don't simplify to write 151 specific provision is there but once there is no specific provision then the inherent power that's what I'm saying where 151 apply where 482 applies where 226 applies they're all inherent powers until there is a specific provision you have to use that provision otherwise you can use that inherent power that is how the law is correct correct developed and as you say as a lawyer practicing in high court also you have come across using a section 151 of cpc extensively that's true even though the high court rules and orders are there still because yes yes yes yes this this is the last question we will taking up with Khan like 151 cpc is applicable to all seven court a junior division or senior division 482 crpc is applicable to judicial magistrate first class which act talk about section 482 pass at least I couldn't get the what he's saying no section 482 is not applicable to any criminal court other than high court yes that's specifically bar for 482 specifically provides for the inherent powers of the high court it's 482 specifically says saving of the inherent powers of the high court thank god nothing else court shall determine to limit or affect the inherent powers of the high court to make such orders as maybe necessary to give powers to give effect to any order under this court or to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice yes that part is specifically listed with the high court itself yes yes yes yes so thank you to all those participants who have helped us to push the things forward in the right perspective and as our logo is that why not share the knowledge down to the roots where people otherwise could not have been connected so do share like share and subscribe our youtube channel of beyond law clc where all the webinars have been uploaded including that of just David Chandrasekhar is given his insights on different perspectives of law so days do stay connected with us on our facebook instagram for latest updates on the webinars so next week on 14th we have Justice N Kumar speaking upon in the civil procedure court uh reference as well as the arbitration act so amendments in the pleadings with reference to civil procedure court as well as arbitration do stay connected with us on next sunday at 430 530 everyone stay safe stay blessed and thank you sir once again and we have i'm just uh seeing if uh professor vinay mera has joined otherwise we have professor amit i will ask him to share his insights professor amit ma'am has joined the vice chancellor has joined ma'am you will have to unmute yourself i mean there sir yeah professor vinay kappu ma'am kindly unmute yourself it's okay now fine okay good evening everyone it was a wonderful session though i joined later but i could have certain insights about section 151 during our school days or sorry our law school days we only knew that there's an inherent power of judiciary which are very very unlimited but we never knew what is the exact jurisdiction today sir has given a very wonderful information to all who have joined this so i thank him for sparing his time i also thank our co-host vikasti and others for arranging such a enlightening lecture and he's always give us push to join us and we again push our teachers and students to have the information from wherever they get and it has been a very very wonderful forum for them to get and especially for the aspirant judiciary judicial officers because these things you cannot find from any book which these learned speakers share with us so thank you once again to all of you to being with us thank you vikast thank you ma'am and as they say the national law university when we joined up the one year has how it has passed and how we have been transmitting and decimating knowledge with with the help of professor vinay ke mera and dr amit guleria the professor out in the university they all work in tandem the entire staff the entire students work in tandem and it gives us an impetus to work better to improve better to share better with these good speakers like this is the evi chandrashekar and so on and on so thank you everyone stay safe stay blessed we will connect next week thank you thank you mr vikast thank you madam thank you for your uh say good words i have only shared my little experience in the field having been in the district judiciary for more than seven ten and a half years i will often go to law schools also see law colleges also and share my experience what i finally understand is that teachers must endeavor to bifurcate students who are interested in becoming lawyers and train them on these aspects 482 151 all procedural laws all substantive laws which are pressed into service day in and day out for those who try to go to mnc's and other things please make them understand other provisions of law madam one thing whether a law student becomes a lawyer or an mnc company they are expected to know three important acts one is transfer of property act another is contract act and another is specific relief act these are very important acts they will be of great assistance thank you for the kind words mr vikast and madam thank you thank you sir and we wish you join us thank you it's too face thank you thank you thank you thank you ma'am and thank you to all the staff thank you