 What's good George Boy Rocks back again with another video, so let me check out the problem with money in the bank by super kick studios now I remember when money in the bank was introduced at WrestleMania and How it was like one of the few matches on the WrestleMania card outside of other story lines Finally culminating at the show It was one of the few matches that a lot of people Clued in myself was looking forward to because it was kind of a Telltale sign that whoever won that match is going to potentially be one of the new top stars in the company It kind of was that that Molding match to let fans know. Hey, this is who wwe is behind and over the years It hasn't obviously been like that. They made it. It's on pay-per-view At first I wasn't in a grudge for it being it's on pay-per-view But over time I've gotten used to it and I'm okay with it being its own pay-per-view Innocence and then the women had their own money in the bank ladder match Added as well and then just over time. I feel like it People that have one recently Haven't really been spotlighted correctly. Well, I mean obviously the most recent one was Austin theory But he he won his at the probably the most and Proper time to win it since he won his during you know, the Roman reigns era that's still currently going on and at that time We didn't have the world heavyweight championship. So Roman pretty much had the belt hostage, you know, I'm saying so This is one of those other things where Recently it hasn't been as Important like the people that's one hasn't really benefited from it like they used to back in the day So we're gonna check this out man. See what he has to say. Uh, this is By super kick studios been subscribed to them for a while link to the original video will be down below Let's see what he has to say about money in the bank and how it's been utilized As of recently money in the bank contract a brand new creative element used to help those on the cusp of taking that next step Into the upper echelon of WWE superstars get a world championship match whenever and wherever The only thing you needed was the presence of a referee and early on the concept was a hit It was helping people to send to new heights giving stars an opportunity to be top guys and carry world championship gold the past few years However, WWE has strayed away from everything that made a success and it's been a complete mess Yeah execution and track record has been astronomically poor And this is coming from someone who's a huge fan of the concept and honestly just wants to see it return to its Old glory creative elements stop being special when you stop making them special and the money in the bank contract holders have really felt like Afterthoughts the past little bit not suggesting that everyone has but we haven't seen the concept do what it's designed to do And that's elevate most of this coming down to the core of most on-screen wrestling problems And that's booking and of course the selection of the winners Let's talk about last year's winner Austin theory first what happened with this cash in was effectively WWE devaluing what should be a golden ticket to super stardom and the world championship Saying to their fans that we had no end goal in mind with this He cashed in what should be a world title match on a mid-card championship in an open challenge. No less I believe recently they've come out and said that the The winner can cash in obviously he did you know, it was done last year but they can cash in on a The Intercontinental Championship or the United States Championship, which I think is I Get it you can but it's stupid only because The original concept is for you know cash in on the world champion On the top champion They only did I believe this is become a new rule correctly if I'm wrong I did see someone post this or I don't know how accurate it is But if that's the case the adding that stipulation, it's just a way for them to write themselves out If they can't find a reasonable time to cash it in I don't know man. I just think the money in the bank winners should be only going With the top titles it shouldn't be going for the mid-card titles. That's just my opinion to repeat Austin theory chose to cash in his almost guaranteed world championship victory on a secondary title During an open challenge that no one answered after his opponent had been beaten into a pulp and he lost There was no real justification as to why we didn't have someone come out and even attempt to preserve the concept The rules were just changed on the fly and another cash in was wasted Yeah in retrospect the filled cash in stings more now that we have the world heavyweight championship But okay, I guess it does make some sense. There was virtually no way he was beating Roman I'll give them this one, but let's keep going, but that's the problem They did that to themselves They did that to themselves a baby booked Roman to have both titles. They didn't split the titles They didn't do nothing. So of course Austin theory was screwed. There was no way he was winning At least if they were to he would have tried to cash in and failed And then you could have went with that storyline where Austin says screw it and goes roll on everybody I would have went with that But they booked themselves into that corner the year previous was one of the very few bright spots in the contract past six or seven Years and that was biggie someone who is a logical winner a guy who needed something to bring him to that top tier and he ended Up becoming WWE champion his subsequent reign was not handled Well, and he was made to look like a weak WWE champion oftentimes taking a backseat to whatever his challengers were doing But what the contract did was give him that initial reign put his name with elite company so that they can build from there With stronger booking the right tweaks a more serious approach and of course health permitting Biggie can still be a big player for the WWE by virtue of his win It at least did something to say that this guy belongs here There's been so many times where the following reign after the cash-in just isn't strong But once you put them up in the conversation with former WWE champions You got to do things to sustain their credibility and justify the win before him Otis won the Money in the Bank contract And this was a disaster WWE had no idea what to do with him You could tell that they didn't have plans for him to win a world title or be a main guy and through his reign as Mr. Money in the Bank He was never a threat always goofy the contract was a lunchbox at one point Yeah, and you knew this guy's in a tag team There's no way he actually does it what made matters worse was when he lost the contract It was because of his tag partner Otis who turned on him the turn was never explained They didn't have a proper rivalry and they ended up drafted to raw and smackdown with it never going anywhere Otis went back to being a tag wrestler if they planned for him to do something Why'd he just it was pointless? That was missing it was thrown on to him for the sake of I don't even think I watched that money in a big I don't think I believe that was the money in bank. They was on top of WWE headquarters. Correct me if I'm wrong. I Saw clips, you know Well boy Reagan tossed off the top of the building But no, I don't even think I watched money in the bank that year Stock value eventually the Miz won the contract from Otis and he failed his cash in got it back via storyline Shenanigans cashed in won the world title for a grand total of eight days and what did that eight days really do for the Miz? transitional champion and WWE just wasted another go-around for the concept the others in that match AJ Styles Alistair Black Daniel Bryan and Baron Corbin getting to Corbin He failed his cash in and I feel like this is where the whole unraveling for money in the bank really started back in 2017 Corbin fell flat on his face and personally I'm not sure how I would have felt if he would have succeeded just two months after holding the money in the bank Was it the right time for him? I don't know after him It was Braun Strowman who won and this was actually logical in terms of the winner a guy who had been around for two years They let him develop be part of big storylines Showcase him and now he just needed something to take that next step He cashed in ahead of time got his match with Roman Reigns at Hell in a Cell That match ended in a no contest when Brock Lesnar showed up and tore the Cell door off Sticking with Lesnar 2019's men's match saw him win I love Brock Lesnar as much as the next guy But he didn't need it at the time There was probably a much easier and less convoluted way to get to Rollins and Lesnar at Summerslam We'll also giving the opportunity to maybe a McIntyre or a Ballard But the men's is nothing compared to the rushed out product We've been getting on the women's side of the six winners five of them have held it for a day or less It's barely got a history behind it in terms of actual holders in terms of the actual Sustained miss money in the bank runs the woman's match was introduced in 2017 and up until this point We've had one woman that being Carmella who's had a sustained run with the briefcase And even the way in which they crowned the first miss money in the bank was more Convoluted than it needed to be with them making amends on the very next match Down Alexa Bliss Liv Morgan and Bailey all cashed in their contracts within hours of their win at that same event Nikki ASH just 24 hours later. Well, Oscar was awarded the raw women's title again 24 hours after she won though. That's no fault of her own. Yeah, is it now mr. Rollins I want to talk quickly Rollins is his party. He couldn't pull out I said earlier how this can help someone stay at that top tier of superstars her title ring lasted 32 days She didn't do anything inspiring during her time as raw women's champion And she hasn't even sniffed the top end of the women's division since in the woman's case It really feels like they want that contract to be done with as soon as possible Yeah, they opt for creating cash in the night of rather than playing the long game Yeah, this concept shouldn't be given a pass. It can be better It should be better, but they're just going through the motions with it every single year It works it works if it doesn't well, there's always next year with the winners You're not just devaluing the concept. You're losing development time You're losing months of having someone assume that role and what could have been an easy decision by just selecting someone who's hot Instead turns into a muddled mess because of shock value and the selection they go with You don't just create a new star because they win money in the bank My examples are always Rollins and edge that when this concept is given care and time can be a game-changer And really help the trajectory of someone's career of the 28 cash-ins men's and women's only Austin theory Baron Corbin and Damian Sandow have actually lost the match even though Sina failed his cash-in He still won the match via DQ Strowman's was a no contest so the success rate is high and that's not suggesting that every cash-in needs to be Successful one or that every winner needs to tease cashing in multiple times before they do But just keep them as a threat and use the time while they're holding it to your advantage I read online that some people want to see the concept retired. I really disagree with that No, I don't think you really can with how big money the bank has gotten plus What's the point of putting it away for a little bit and then making a big deal of it when it returns? I think the revival of it should come in the way that the holders are booked a good cash-in creates drama Tensions suspense and when done right leaves you with a moment that a superstars career was either catapulted or revived Now let's talk about this year, but who should be mr. And miss money in the bank. I think it's LA night's time He's got everything to get a classic money. Let's get it going. Let's let's simple simple I saw we didn't blot stream Monday night raw last night, but I did see LA night coming out there to address everyone that's gonna be in money in the bank. I believe Logan Paul You know, he didn't have to qualify Like everyone else he's Logan Paul So he gets to be granted into money in the bank and I saw just LA night's promo Just talking about the different wrestlers and how it was it it worked when he soon as he got out there He had a huge pop crowd loved him crowd chanting his name If they don't give him the belt They have wasted our time. They've wasted his time. There's no reason why he shouldn't win He's that over and I have him hold the belt to the right time Hell, I would have him cash in on you know, I'm saying You can have him cash in on the Seth Rollins or maybe wait till Cody Rhodes went in you can have him cash in on Cody Well, it don't matter. There's plenty of options here. He's over push him They don't push him that money in a bank that They've wasted everybody's time if he don't win they've wasted everybody's time, bro If they give it to Logan Paul, I'm a very be very disappointed because Logan he's a he's one. He's a special attraction do this fantastic in the ring So I will give him all the credit, but he doesn't need the money in the bank I think that should be reserved for people that are there weekly Because that no, no, it's LA night's time the bank holder He's gonna be a guy who if given the opportunity will have the ideal run with it. He'll be funny He'll cut great promos. He'll be sleazy. He'll be entertaining and these are the times Yes, the pinpoint moments where you can just see he needs the money in the bank Let him continue to build for a few months and use that device to bridge him over into that next level They should pull the trigger on him so far the men's money in the bank ladder match has no former world champions And that's really cool. That's good opportunity in front of you on the women's side EOS guy is a solid option though I think what they're doing with Zoe Stark so early is pretty good a money in the bank wouldn't could position her really well Especially since she's a heel she'll have that exposure working with Trish and down the line If you want to do something where Trish ends up winning a woman's title only for the student to cash in on the teacher I think that would be that Of course if she continues to work with Trish for a sustained period of time that would also give her the right amount of Screen time for audiences to get familiar with her so it wouldn't feel as rushed either at the end of the day This concept has been so strangely booked and I just want to see it return to its old glory It's been such a mess the past few years and it's by WWE's own fault Elevation is key and that's what this concept is at the core of things Money in the bank is a plot device and a way to get someone to that next level Without having to do all the extra bits in the middle at one time This concept was so instrumental in bridging the gap between a mid Carter and a main event level player or helping someone That's lost the limelight return to that glory the amount of moments and legendary money in the bank runs We've had have been great and it's so pivotal in kick starting a big storyline or tying up one That's been going on for a while and lately it hasn't been doing any of that But what do you guys think what needs to happen in order for money in the bank to gain some prestige again? And not just be there like I said pick strong winners Position them to look good while they hold it keep them as a constant threat to the champion and not just some chump Who has it as a prop? Hope you guys have been enjoying the op. I agree with what he was saying it's pretty much nailed it all they need to really do is Pick the pick the winner and have them create the story Create that enhance their character with the run You don't need them to cash in the night of especially on the women's side. They've been doing that sort of frequently They just cash in as soon as they get it. You don't even have that time. So people are initially hype Okay, this person won or it was a shocking moment But then when they win it then that's it and then that's when the fall starts That's when people stop can because you haven't built it up enough for people to even really truly invest in you in you Or people to buy in into this person being the new champion So have them hold the belt create storylines and and potential teases and opportunities Built with that person how that person Built up with that briefcase, you know I'm saying that's that was really the tool then winning the briefcase is cool But now is to showcase to everybody This is gonna be the the next person up potentially, you know, cuz you know You don't have to always have them successfully cash in which is why I think Austin theory trying to cash in on Roman and failing would have made sense Because Roman just had too many weapons at his disposal and you can do that that makes sense He wasn't gonna lose it anytime soon So I think Honestly, it's just building up these storylines with these wrestlers that went in instead of just easily having them cash it in Right as soon as they get it, you know build up those storylines and honestly money in the bank is right around the corner So that's why I wanted to check out this video and I'm just be honest with you if it's not LA night. It's a waste Sorry, and it shouldn't be Logan either. I like Logan Paul and what he's done in WWE But it should be LA night. That's it in my personal opinion. So comment down below Let me know what are but what other better ways they can I guess Utilize money in the bank make it seem a little bit more special than it has been in the past couple years Let me know down below but I appreciate all of the support you guys are on channel wrote 250k And I'm still the n speedy you to the rest of the world. Appreciate you're kicking me. See you next one