 Enrico Letta, former Prime Minister of Italy, now in Paris as Dean of the School of International Relations at Silspo, who can, I hope, get up above nationalism and tell us really what is straining Europe in your view and what matters most, what needs to be fixed most. I think it was very good to have this session, Tiri, immediately after Kevin's session on China, because I guess at the end of the day our takes on Europe as puissance, as Ruber said, can only be shaped in the discussion about the relationship with China and the U.S. In the new word in which G2 is taking place, there's a new topic for Europe, and the new topic is being together. The alternative, the other option, is having just a choice in 10 years time to be singularly an American colony or a Chinese colony. That is the big topic, and there's no other discussion on that. And I think it's the main point today with 28 Brexit, the choice would be only for each of our countries to be an American colony or a Chinese colony. And I think Brexit was the idea of the U.K. to be in next century, to be the 51st American state or something like that. I think Europe can be a third superpower, only being united and only being united and taking leadership on two main subjects, and two main subjects are subject for the future, and the two main subjects for the future are climate change. We had a terrific panel this morning on that, and the second one is technological human, if I may say it in the word, able to take leadership on how to have good regulation, how to protect persons right. It was very good this morning. We had this point about ownership of data, corporations in the U.S., state in China, and person in Europe. And at the end of the day, that is the true difference, and that allows us to think to have a leadership on that. So I think we have to develop this point and we have to take this leadership. So these two are, for me, the main subject for the future. And I think Ursula von der Leyen had a good choice, having some competences for the vice president of the commission, having these two subjects at the very top of the list with Festagger and Timmermans on these two topics. There's a but on all this discussion that is the fact that everything can be completely overwhelmed by this present Turkish situation. I say that because I remember how the previous migration crisis raised, and it was with the Syrian crisis. We underestimated consequences of the mismanagement of the Syrian crisis, and we had one million of people, and we had completely disaster politically. I think, with all the consequences, we know, I think partly Brexit was also because of the images of the jungle of Calais and Cologne, the Italian situation because of that, and then I've been in Germany and boxing in Spain. So my final point, Steven, is I'm really worried about what is happening because there are two topics. One is Erdogan's threats, but there's the second one. His threats to open the door, of course. But there's the second one. The second one is that if the war will continue, we will have Kurdish immigrants, and that will be for us Europeans without enough new rules because we, during the crisis, we had two crises, financial crisis and migration crisis. For financial crisis, we fixed the roof partially, but we fixed. We created DSM. We had many new tools. For migration crisis, the situation today is as it was five years ago, six years ago. We don't have tools. So my final point is that I hope we will be able to face this threat. This threat can be a disaster for Europe in the next months, and I think on this migration crisis, we need to have new emergency tools and not to look at business as usual. Tools, because they don't work.