 Erwin Mariton, you're a member of the French National Assembly and an expert on Russia. How should the European Union now deal with Russia? I'm thinking in terms of Ukraine and also, of course, Syria. Openness and attention. Europe obviously took too long having strong proposals towards Russia and the Ukraine for European and Russian-Ukrainian economic cooperation. We obviously were very slow at understanding that relation with Russia with the Syrian crisis was something absolutely necessary, but that does not necessarily mean alignment with Russia. The conditions of the Russian intervention in the Ukraine obviously do provoke criticism and we should not forget that. We must not forget that some of the countries of Europe were countries in the Soviet Union prior to the disappearance of the Soviet Union. I speak of the Baltic states, for example, and for many in Europe it would be ununderstandable if we were to tolerate intervention from Russia in the Ukraine, for example. I acknowledge that the situation is complex in Crimea particularly. So we have to find solutions. The solution is not simple. We know that, but it means we should not either ignore Russia or organize tension with Russia. This is no solution, but we should not align systematically with Russian interests, surely not necessarily ours. This also applies concerning the situation in Syria. And it does seem that the view of Russia has changed quite considerably within the European Union and the United States because of the Russian intervention in Syria, as though Russia can now be a partner rather than an opponent. My analysis actually is that Russia, yes, can be a partner. This does not mean an alignment of interests. Things are much more complex than that. And in a conference such as the WPC, we do understand how things are complex on all continents actually, but since the attitude of Europe and the attitude of Russia have changed at about the same time, then cooperation and partnership are possible. Well, you mentioned WPC. I mean, what role do you find WPC plays for you and your fellow politicians and so on? Well, it helps understanding strategic issues. It helps reminding us how complex they are. It helps understanding also the distance there can be between speech and action. And I find it particularly interesting here to see that, however, many in the WPC, for example, have been, for a long time, friends of Russia. The French debate we're having presently, which may tend in certain circumstances towards an alignment towards Russia, is not shared by everybody. That's why I was underlining that the evolution is interesting because both parts have evolved. Russia has understood that it should not fight exclusively the inside opponents of President Assad, the Liberation Army of Syria, for example, that actually in certain circumstances it would help Daesh quicker than Assad. And we've understood that we had to hold discussions with Russia concerning the future of Syria. And this complexity of things, the fact that everybody's got to make a step, is part of the discussions and the enlightenment of WPC. Efei Merhitan, thank you very much. Thank you.