 I think antitrust is essential, but it is not sufficient to deal with issues in this area. Remember, antitrust is a very targeted statute. The Sherman Act and the Clayton Acts have you in Congress telling the agencies to prevent a reduction in competition and to protect, prevent efforts to monopolize. It's not about promoting competition. That's what you put in the Communications Act. It's not about preventing all discrimination that is unreasonable. It's about getting at it when it is blocking entry, or when it's cartel-type behavior, or when it's actually allowing for a dominant firm to expand its dominance. So it can get at a few things, but not everything, even in the competition realm. And then beyond competition, as Dr. Turner Lee says, there are a lot of other values at stake here. This is about opportunities and equity across our society. That is something the antitrust laws only address through trying to promote consumer welfare. It doesn't address the other attributes. So I think the FCC plays a critical role. Title II is a portion of it, the principles and the rulemaking authority. 706 as a mandate was offering the ability to extend broadband and possibly even expand it, as Dr. Turner Lee said, to low-income customers. I think that could be extremely valuable as we move forward and make it affordable for everybody. So it's the combination of the tools I think that's so critical.