 Thank you very much for having me here today. I participated this conference last year through online, and I felt very lonely being alone in my room, being away from Abu Dhabi, so I'm very, very glad to be here today, finally. And in my maybe about five to seven minutes comment, I'd like to make a two-point about the concept of Indo-Pacific. First point is about the three different kinds of concept that comes in my mind. And then second point is about three different approaches based on three different concepts. So first point, three different kinds of concepts. I'm not an expert on the French painting, but I know that there are three categories of painting. One is a portrait painting, portrait, very, very clear, almost like a photograph, very clear paint. And second one is impressionist painting, so like a Renoir. I hope my French pronunciation is not too terrible for Renoir, like Manet, and a bit vague paint, vague. And third category is pointillism. Pointillism painting is George Surak. Am I correct? George Surak. So you put the dot on the white canvas, and dot will lead to a very vague paint. So portrait painting, painting and impressionist painting and pointillism painting. I think these are the concept, three different kinds of concept in the Pacific, and I support impressionist concept. Then I will explain it later. So second point is that then what is a specific approach in the Pacific based on the different three kinds of concept? First approach is sharing interest approach. It's almost like putting a dot on the canvas, so it's almost like a George Surak type of approach. Under this approach, every country can cooperate with each other as long as you can share the interest, economic interest or political interest or security interest. You don't care whether they are democracy or autocrat or whatever. So for example, economic infrastructure project, joint project in several other key areas could be a sharing interest project. So under this approach, we cooperate with, for example, China or in Brunei, Kingdom or Vietnam, communist regime, it doesn't matter. So then second level of the approach is impressionist approach. That is maybe, in other words, sharing norms, sharing norm approach. For example, sharing common norm means rule of law or freedom of navigation under the enclose or if it is an economic infrastructure project, maybe sharing common norm would be transparency or dead sustainability or governability and so on. So sharing norm approach and then highest level and most difficult approach is sharing value approach. So under this approach, like minded country, that can share the value, maybe from the western point of view, value of the democracy. We'll cooperate with each other and then try to promote common value. I think that maybe Biden administration to some extent try to adapt sharing value approach. But the weakness of this approach is that you cannot cooperate with potentially important partner like Vietnam because Vietnam is not democracy and obviously we cannot cooperate with China and the sharing value approach. So I think that the best approach for me is sharing norm. Sharing interest approach is good and very comfortable. You can cooperate with everybody including China but it will lead us to an economic prosperity but it doesn't create any order, just sharing interest. But sharing value approach is good but also cannot incorporate many countries. So in between sharing norms, freedom of navigation, rule of law or transparency of infrastructure projects, sharing norm could be a reasonable approach and I think that that is the approach I support and also more or less Japanese government has been trying to promote. Under this, maybe we can also cooperate with China or urge China to accommodate and close in the South China Sea and so on. That is my comment, thank you. Well thank you very much for your I think fundamentally impressionist approach to geopolitics. The problem that maybe we shall discuss that a bit later is sometimes when a real confrontation comes before us, we have to make real choices and so maybe we can discuss this a bit later.