 So welcome everybody. As you've heard there was supposed to be a big Trump announcement today and a little bit ago that dropped. Although I'm not sure it's what everybody was expecting and I know I'm not reading the comments but I already know what's in the comments. I'm getting to it. I'm getting there. But yeah, Trump made his announcement a little bit earlier on True Social, posting that the major announcement was dropping. My official Donald Trump digital trading card collection is here. Oh, digital trading card collection. So these limited edition cards feature amazing art of my life and career as a superhero who won as a champion in the WWF I guess. Very much like a baseball card but hopefully much more exciting. Go to collecttrumpcards.com forward slash never mind just collecttrumpcards.com and get your cards now. Only $99 each, folks. Would make a great Christmas gift. Don't wait. They will be gone I believe very quickly. So I guess these are NFTs. I guess. I'm not really sure. Was that the big announcement? No, it wasn't. Although he does call this a major announcement here. So it's a little confusing and I think he may have made a mistake by doing that by putting this out first. So there's that announcement and then we have this announcement from Jack Pasobic of wrong Twitter. Exclusive video. He's obtained a copy of President Trump unveiling the major planks of his official free speech policy proposal. So this is going to be ties right into the topic I wanted to talk about anyway today. So that's just perfect. This is the first video drop in a series to come from his 2024 presidential campaign. So there is an actual real announcement and we will watch that now. If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country. It's as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple just like dominoes one by one. They'll go down. That's why today I'm announcing my plan to shatter the left wing censorship regime and to reclaim the right to free speech for all Americans. And reclaim is a very important word in this case because they've taken it away. In recent weeks, bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister group of deep state bureaucrats Silicon Valley tyrants, left wing activists and depraved corporate news media have been conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people. They have collaborated to suppress vital information on everything from elections to public health. The censorship cartel must be dismantled and destroyed, and it must happen immediately. And here's my plan. First, within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding with any organization, business or person to censor, limit, categorize or impede the lawful speech of American citizens. I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as mis or dis information. And I will begin the process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship directly or indirectly, whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health, Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are. Second, I will order the Department of Justice to investigate all parties involved in the new online censorship regime, which is absolutely destructive and terrible, and to aggressively prosecute any and all crimes identified. These include possible violations of federal civil rights law, campaign finance laws, federal election law, securities law and antitrust laws, the Hatch Act, and a host of other potential criminal, civil, regulatory and constitutional offenses. To assist in these efforts, I am urging House Republicans to immediately send preservation letters, and we have to do this right now, to the Biden administration, the Biden campaign and every Silicon Valley tech giant, ordering them not to destroy evidence of censorship. Third, upon my inauguration as President, I will ask Congress to send a bill to my desk revising Section 230 to get big online platforms out of censorship business. From now on, digital platforms should only qualify for immunity protection under Section 230 if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness, and non-discrimination. We should require these platforms to increase their efforts to take down unlawful content such as child exploitation and promoting terrorism while dramatically curtailing their power to arbitrarily restrict lawful speech. Fourth, we need to break up the entire toxic censorship industry that has arisen under the false guise of tackling so-called miss and disinformation. The federal government should immediately stop funding all nonprofits and academic programs that support this authoritarian project. If any U.S. university is discovered to have engaged in censorship activities or election interferences in the past, such as flagging social media content for removal of blacklisting, those universities should lose federal research dollars and federal student loan support for a period of five years and maybe more. We should also enact new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureaucrats who partner with private entities to do an end run around the Constitution and deprive Americans of their first, fourth, and fifth amendment rights. In other words, deprive them of their vote. And once you lose those elections and once you lose your borders like we have, you no longer have a country. Furthermore, to confront the problems of major platforms being infiltrated by legions of former deep status and intelligence officials, there should be a seven-year calling off period before any employee of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DNI, DHS, or DoD is allowed to take a job at a company possessing vast quantities of U.S. user data. Fifth, the time has finally come for Congress to pass a digital bill of rights. This should include a right to digital due process. In other words, government officials should need a court order to take down online content, not send information requests such as the FBI was sending to Twitter. Furthermore, when users of big online platforms have their content or accounts removed, throttled, shadow banned, or otherwise restricted, no matter what name they use, they should have the right to be informed that it's happening, the right to a specific explanation of the reason why, and the right to a timely appeal. In addition, all users over the age of 18 should have the right to opt out of content moderation and curation entirely and receive an unmanipulated stream of information if they so choose. The fight for free speech is a matter of victory or death for America and for the survival of Western civilization itself. When I am president, this whole rotten system of censorship and information control will be ripped out of the system at large. There won't be anything left by restoring free speech. We'll begin to reclaim our democracy and save our nation. Thank you and God bless America. Okay, well, actually I have to say that was pretty good. I didn't expect that good from him, actually. I guess a few things. Number one, he's dead on, correct here. I mean, what's been revealed in the Twitter files is serious. I mean, I don't know how many of you here are on the stream right now who either aren't really into politics or maybe you don't like Republicans, you don't like conservatives, you're a Democrat, but most likely your sources of information are purposely keeping from you how real and severe these Twitter files are. I mean, I've seen several different news broadcasts today and one where Oliver Darcy says on CNN, their fact checker says that there's nothing in there and it doesn't show any collusion between government and big tech. Okay, so number one, it does. Okay, there are files in there. I'll find them here. There are files in there that talk about the FBI or I'm sorry, the head, the lead Noel Roth or Noel Roth. Is that it? Roth is his last name. The lead of the Twitter safety team, trust and safety team. There was correspondence within that group where they talked about meeting with the FBI. So we already know that the FBI was involved. We didn't even need that though because we already knew from whistleblowers coming to the Republicans and there are apparently a lot of them coming out of the FBI telling Republicans that they were told not to investigate the Hunter Biden story, that they were going to the big tech outlets and telling them that, oh, you got to be on the lookout for Russian disinformation and you got to understand that it's an implied threat to them. Like, you need to look for this Russian disinformation when you start hearing about this Russian disinformation censor that because you don't want blowback like you were getting after the 2020 election, right? You don't want that blowback. So you better do what we say and so they did. They suppressed the story. We already knew this. Again, another reason we knew this because on Joe Rogan, Mark Zuckerberg stated that the FBI came to him and told him that there was Russian disinformation coming and to look out for it. And when he sees it, he needs to stop it. And of course, when that Hunter Biden laptop story came out, what was the immediate Democrat and Democrat state media narrative that it was Russian disinformation? Boom. Okay, so spare us all over Darcy. Not that you're watching this, but if you ever get wind of this, spare us. I actually did tweet him on this topic. Let me show you guys here real quick. You can see the video real fast because it's just not true. Let's see here. As you know, if you're watching this, this isn't like all Elon Musk has claimed he wants to bring transparency to Twitter and well, it's not totally what's happening, but cue the birth of the Twitter files. Let me tell you more. Musk selected a handful of journalists unaffiliated with major credible news organizations with whom he has shared internal Twitter systems and communications that seem to focus on some of Twitter's most high profile and sometimes controversial content moderation decisions. These files, which the selected journalists then tweet out, appear to call into question the integrity of the company's former leadership while also riling up Twitter's right-leaning, some of them right-leaning users. So she starts to discredit it right off the bat by saying that by saying that he gave it to select reporters. Well, yeah, because the media is involved in all of this. So why would he release this stuff to them? They're the corrupt part in all of this. So yeah, why would they give it to them? And it's clear why they didn't because they're spinning every bit they can and trying to discredit by saying that he gave it to specific journalists and then saying it's riling up the right-wingers on Twitter. Oh, it's riling up right-wingers. So that means there's nothing to it because we've been told over and over again that anything you don't want to hear is a right-wing, a rushing conspiracy theory or something. All right. And so when you hear those words, anybody who's like a normal CNN watcher and believer, they're just going to instantly just dismiss whatever comes out in these files. This week, former CEO Joe Squil with many of you, Sullivan. Thanks guys very much for being here. And Oliver, we'll get to your reporting in just a minute on these. I would though like to begin with, I think what is maybe the most talked about Twitter file. What are they called? Is that right? The Twitter file, yeah. Yeah, Twitter file, the Hunter Biden laptop and the New York Post story that was squashed weeks ahead of the election. What has come out of the Twitter files on that? Well, I think one, we need to first say that Jack Dorsey admitted that suppressing the New York Post story was a mistake. So that he did up I think last year. So who cares? You know, the damage has been done. This is classic drive-by media stuff, by the way. They do their damage and they speed off and that's what you're seeing right here. He apologized. So it's done and over. Done. Move on. You know, move on.org. That organization was started by a bunch of Democrats who wanted the media and Republicans to move on from the Clinton scandals. And that's like the strategy ever since. They just want you to move on from anything that they don't want you to hear about Democrats or that put snake Democrats in negative light or the media because again, they're two sides. They are united, allied. They are one and the same. The Twitter files though, they really showed the, I think, messy content moderation that was happening behind the scenes. And I think we're seeing, and it's probably no surprise, but we're seeing that not everyone agrees is on the same page when they're making these complex decisions. I will say on this specific Twitter files drop, I thought what was really noteworthy was that Elon Musk's handpicked reporter, Matt Taibbi, said that there was no evidence of government involvement in trying to suppress this story. And that was a big claim that Elon Musk had made. That's just such crap. I mean, we already had evidence of that. We already knew that that was going on. I mean, there's so many stories out there. Of course, they're all on like right-leaning outlets. You would think whistleblowers would be a big deal, right, in the media, especially after those whistleblowers that came after Trump. Remember how how loud and heroic they portrayed whistleblowers? Unless you're into this, you know, reading and watching other media, then you would not know about this story. And left-wingers, Democrats tend to be in very insular bubbles. And I've talked about this before, but Jack Dorsey talked about it. Studies done on Twitter where they found that right leading people, right-wingers and Republicans tended to go into Democrats, follow Democrats, follow left-wingers and engage them. Whereas the left and Democrats did not do that. They would not follow the right and people they disagree with and would not engage with them. And so that I think that that's a big reason why this isn't a big story. I mean, but you have all these stories about whistleblowers coming forward, whistleblowers saying they were told not to investigate. And so, you know, there's already a lot of evidence that the government was involved in this. And the fact that they're fact-checking Oliver Darcy on CNN is gonna stand there and lie like that. And beyond that, we do have, let's see, UL Roth FBI. So all I have to do, he said there's no connection there. Haha! Elon Musk claimed that there was, am I saying his name wrong? You would think I'd know this. I've been reading this stuff for the last few days. Hold on. UL Roth. Yeah. Yeah, okay. It looks like the results are below are changing quickly. That's always a good sign, right? But yeah, here we go. National review. The FBI met weekly with these guys and that is in the Twitter files. And hopefully, and here we go. Somebody at Twitter says, very boring business meeting. This is definitely not about Trump. Then UL, the lead of the trust and safety team, who is apparently, I don't want to make any accusations, but just look him up. The guy's got some issues. So he said, pretty much. And then definitely not with the FBI, I swear. Like, what is this? This is the FBI's meeting with people like this. Does that seem professional? It seems very childish and like they know what they're doing. Like, oh, we're colluding with the FBI to come after Trump. And who knows what else? Who knows what else we're going to find out about this stuff. But that's one bit of evidence. And then here they talk about partnerships. Not sure we described the FBI DHS as experts or some NGOs. But there's another one here. Maybe this is it. There's other talk within these files about, you know, meeting with the FBI. So like, we're talking about journalists, a fact checker at CNN and the rest of the media. It's not just CNN. We just watched that one clip. But the same thing is playing out everywhere. But these people claim to be journalists. They're not the least bit interested in investigating this or anything. Like, they're literally just like reading it and they'll read off the things. And then Oliver will say, oh, well, Elon Musk was proven wrong because there's no evidence of collusion between the government here. So and you see how they're just very dismissive. They don't want to dig. You know, I thought reporters and journalists, they wanted to dig for the stories. They wanted to hold power accountable. Not that's not what they do anymore. And I think we're all pretty clear on that by now. But that's not what they do. And that's not what they're doing here. I love how they have this panel of they have this panel that's all and we're getting right to that. You know, it's all left winger, Democrat types. Nobody's going to challenge the other. And it's very dishonest. So back this, that was kind of divergent back to what Trump was talking about about free speech and how important it is. And, you know, we're not going to have a country if we don't have it. And we need to figure out what's going on with the FBI and the DOJ and the fact that they're clearly being used as a political weapon by the Democrats. I mean, unless you can find me some examples of the FBI, you know, lying to get FISA warrants on Democrats or, you know, any of this stuff that's been going on, you can't. It's all been very one sided and make no mistake. There is an assault on your free speech rights. The Democrats love to talk about how big of a threat to the Constitution Republicans are. And here, I'll switch back to this from it. Oh, and I did want to read some question. Some people said hi. Dixie George, thanks a lot for watching my channel. I appreciate it. Get more leftist to debate on your channel. SRC says I try all the time. Nobody wants to. But free speech, there is a major assault on free speech going on right now. And it's almost like they used what's going on in Twitter as sort of like a counterattack. So like they are, they had control of Twitter. They lost it. Elon got it. Damn it. Think of it as a battle. So he's got that hill. And now their counterattack to that is now going to be just to go after free speech and demonize free speech. And anybody who would defend free speech as racist white supremacist, you know, pick whatever label you want. What's the word they're calling now? A sort of terrorist. I can't remember what it's called. But so we have these hearings going on right now. And this is going to be the way that they go after free speech. And this has been something they've done for a long time. We've seen them try to like connect violence to Republican rhetoric and stuff like that. You see on the view the other day, they said, you know, they had Sonny hosting up there saying that, oh, Democrats don't get violent. You don't see this violence on the on the Democrat side. It's just Republican side. That's a lie. You know, obviously, we see lots of violence. We saw the GOP baseball game shooting, which I hate that we call it that because it's actually a domestic terrorist attack. It was a domestic terrorist attack in an attempt to assassinate half the GOP Senate. Okay, our GOP Congress, which if he if that guy would have been successful, that's what would have happened. And can you imagine the trouble that would have created in this country if there's got to be new elections, because all these Republican senators been killed? That should be a huge story, but it wasn't. They buried it immediately. The FBI lied about it, called it suicide by cop, and then later changed it to domestic terrorism long after that, you know, Republicans could get any use out of it or try to bring it back up and be like, oh, Democrats, you know, incited this attack with their rhetoric. Because you remember the shooter yelled, this is for health care. That was a bunch of that was a big rhetoric at the time because Republicans were opposing Obamacare. You had Bernie Sanders out there saying that Republicans want you to die. Well, I'm sorry, that was Alan Grayson years before, but Bernie Sanders actually said something very similar. He said, you know, millions of Americans will die for Republicans get their way and that kind of thing. So you could easily make the argument that Democrats incited that right based on their own standards. But when he was asked about that by Jake Tapper, if he held had any accountability for that, he didn't. Tapper did not reference that specifically. He said, are you responsible for violence carried out by your supporters? And this guy, the shooter at the Republican baseball game actually works for Bernie Sanders. Okay, Bernie Sanders was like, no, I can't be responsible for everything that my supporters do and say if that were the case, I'd be apologizing constantly. Exactly. You cannot blame Bernie Sanders for what that guy did. Okay, you cannot. It's not that's not you cannot keep that standard up. Obviously, it's something you can only implement one way as a weapon. And that's what they do. And so now we're seeing these hearings going on. And this is how Elon is mixed in this because these hearings are going on. And they're trying to say that, oh, because Elon bought Twitter, now there's all this violence happening to trans people, even though they don't bring up any examples or prove that had anything to do, even though you see these people over and over say there's a direct line. Okay, you which you never hear the other direction. Okay, you never hear there's never like a CNN panel or an MSNBC panel or an ABC News or CBS, or they're like, hmm, you know, this violence that we saw the left wing violence, because they'd have to report on the left wing violence in the first place for this to happen. But you never see them like try to connect that to Democrats or their own rhetoric because see, they always try to say Fox, they're rhetoric. If they were trying, if they were holding the standard equally, they'd have to be like, oh, well, maybe our rhetoric is causing us. They're not going to do that. So this is a very real threat. And I'm really happy Trump put out that declaration. I thought he sounded really good because this is what we're up against, folks. Look at this already receptive to that message, take it to heart, and it reinforces their prejudices. In their minds, trans people either become victims to be saved from ourselves. One example of this in action is the misuse of the term groomer. Anti LGBTQ activists have appropriated this terminology used by survivors of childhood sexual abuse and used it to slander LGBTQ people and our allies as predatory harmful toward children. Okay, so I gotta step in here real quick. Hopefully you guys can hear this. Okay. Hey, let's be frank. What's up, buddy? Yeah, Frank, I was just saying that that he should have led with the agenda had the cards come out like this weekend or something like what was that he obviously thought he'd get the biggest boom and views on the on the NFT if he did that first. But I agree. I think it was a bad move because it's going to overshadow the message that came out was I thought Trump was very strong and very eloquent. Actually, I thought he did. That was one of the best speeches I've ever heard him give actually and I'll play it again here in a minute, but I want to get through my little spiel on this. So this meant like I can't even I can't even tell the truth. That's the situation. That's the environment we're in here. So this person, Olivia Hunt is up there saying claiming that Oh, free speech is dangerous because there's people online taking the term groomer and applying it to gay and trans people. And this is being done to incite violence against them. First of all, the term groomer is being used exactly how it's supposed to be used. She's Olivia just said there that grooming is one a child, you know, is suffer sexual abuse as a child and and that's grooming. This is exactly why it's being called grooming now. What's happening is that people on Twitter or wherever else TikTok, they're retweeting videos of trans and gay people in the form of drag queens dancing and stripping for children in some cases that kids putting money and their G strings in some cases like bare man ass right in the face of a little girl as he, you know, you know, shakes his ass in her face teaching her to do the same thing. I mean, that's the things that we're calling grooming. Okay, we're not there's no like attempts to connect that to gay and trans people. It just so happens that the people that are partaking in this activity that we're calling out happen to be gay and trans or drag queens. I don't know that drag queens are considered trans. So I wouldn't even say that it is trans. It's just drag queens mostly and anybody who would support, you know, like what's the whole point of connecting a grown man who's dressed in an over sexualized costume reading to kids. So in the media, you'll always see this, you'll see them. They're like, this is what the right wingers are upset about this person just reading this story about a princess to these children. No, no, that's not what people are upset about. Although it's still questionable. It's just like why the question is why their answer would be all was making the kids more inclusive and they won't be hate monger. You're going to have to explain how that happens. You know, it's very, it's very odd and it's very odd that the media will not play these videos that people like lives a tick tock and gays against groomers will retweet videos that these people upload themselves. Teachers who are obsessed with like gender, this gender ideology and pushing it on their kids and affirming themselves through the children. Lots of it's like really weird behavior, including, and you'll see it. I think I've got a clip here from the same hearing where they straight up say that the parents have no say in the children. If children as young as 13 want to start getting on hormone therapy or change their gender or whatever. That's grooming. Like when an adult is taking the child and blocking it from people who care about them and love them and want to protect them. That's grooming, especially when the person that's saying that is claiming that they're trying to keep the person safe. It's very odd and weird. And again, it's very strange that they're using this as an attack on free speech. Like there's no way you can connect these things that this person's talking about. You cannot say that because people are getting called out as groomers. That's leading to violence against trans people. Like there's no connection there. And besides that, I find it funny that they're now complaining about being called groomers when these people regularly have no troubles calling people they disagree with, racists. They throw that, they throw that around like it's, they got a million grenades behind them. They throw them like grenades to shut you up. So racist, white supremacists, white nationalists, far right, right wing extremists, domestic threats, semi-fascists. The president called 100 million Americans semi-fascist, but we cannot call them groomers. Like you watch this and you're like, this cannot be possibly, nobody can possibly be taking this seriously, but they are. And this is what the real threat is. In reality, trans people are significantly more likely to be the victims of sexual abuse than perpetrators of it. And now this misuse to terminology has become part of the political discourse around trans people and is invoked as a reason to further restrict our rights in the name of protecting children. In the name of protecting children. Olivia is so dismissive of that. And what rights exactly? You don't have a right to strip in front of kids. You don't have a right to push your values and your ideology on kids. Like what rights is this person talking about? I have no idea. I ask all the time on Twitter, nobody ever responds. This person gives no examples of what rights. Everything that this person says is very generalized and broad, very nebulous. And it's meant to be that way. And the media, if we had an actual press, they would all be asking many, many questions about this. There would be many, many questions asked at the White House press briefings about this insanity. But no, you can't do that. This same rhetoric has subsequently been used as justification for violent anti-LGBTQ activism. Heavily armed protesters have made numerous attacks or attempts at intimidation against family-friendly pride events and drag performances around the country. There's no such thing as a family-friendly drag performance, okay? That involves a grown man stripping in front of kids. That is not okay. It's not all right. And that is grooming. Even hospitals have been targeted with bomb threats and intimidation tactics based on social media figures spreading baseless stories that the providers are, in their words, mutilating children. And they are. They, you know, tons of proof of that out there, straight from the hospitals and their websites themselves, which they later scrubbed, okay? They didn't scrub it because they didn't think they had something that they needed to hide, right? They obviously thought they needed to hide that and did. And there are countless stories about transitioning, you know, young kids, 13 years older and younger. So that's not true. And, you know, about these bomb threats and everything, like, all the crap that they talk about Trump and Trump supporters and Republicans in general, Elon Musk, like, do they ever worry that their language incites violence against this? Like I just got done talking about the GOP baseball game shooting, but that issue was never raised. And it's because all they care about, they, these people, they've got some sort of psychological problem where they're incapable of applying their own standards, which they want to hold everybody to, to themselves. And that's because in their minds, what they're doing is for the greater good. They think what they're doing is good and what you're doing is bad. And so if this person has to get up there and just lie and attack your free speech and apply standards that this person knows will never be, that they'll never be held to, that's okay. You know, it's, it's like the Sam Harris interview, if you guys saw that where he said that, oh yes, there was a left wing conspiracy to sway the election for Biden, of course, because, and he said, you know, we had to do that because imagine, and I couldn't believe it, like I couldn't believe that because I thought Sam Harris was intelligent and then he said that. But then he said to rationalize it, okay, because this is clearly like authoritarian behavior. So in his mind, he's not authoritarian, he would never support authoritarianism. So he must have done it for a good reason. And the reason he gives is because Trump was like a speeding meteor coming towards the earth that would wipe out all life. So in that, if there was a meteor coming towards earth, wouldn't you do anything you could to stop it? And that's the, that is the danger with these people. I'm telling you, I've been, I've had this website, or I'm sorry, I've had this channel, YouTube channel since 2009, but I didn't really start really getting to go into like 2015. But before that, even I was on forums, you know, talk about this stuff all the time. And what I would always say is that the left is dangerous because they're particularly dangerous because they seem capable of rationalizing anything. And they always sort of, the pretext for everything is like, you know, the earth is warming, oh, we have to save the earth or what we saw the last election, we got to save democracy. It's always these huge things that they don't really, you know, there's no real, there's no real evidence that we're in like, and I'm sorry, there's gonna be people disagree with this, but there's not really any evidence that we're in like a serious threat from global warming right now. And in fact, a lot of the data that they have is skewed because they don't take an account huge population shifts in the areas where they're talking about damage from climate changes, things like that. But it's great for a pretext to do whatever the hell you want to do because you're saving the earth. Joe Biden even said during the midterm elections that the very survival of the earth was on the line. So like, if you've got to have some corrupt government and corrupt press, because the very survival of the earth is online, then they'll do whatever they want and whatever they can do. And that's what you're seeing with these people. There's a straight line that can be drawn from the legislation trying to strip trans people of our human rights to the increasingly hostile and inflammatory rhetoric portraying us as a threat to society to the acts of violence that have taken far too many lives. I mean, the bedrock of the left, this person's ideology is no doubt that whites are a threat to everyone. I mean, that's like the driving force behind our culture right now is that white people, specifically white men are some sort of a threat. John Stuart said white people are a problem. John Stuart, a Jewish man, said that white people are a problem. Like, that's a level of lacking self-awareness in this sort of rationalization process that goes on in these people's heads that it really tells you how far gone they are. I mean, the people engaged in these efforts from the politicians and media figures who normalize the dehumanization of trans people to the influencers who vilify us on social media to the people brandishing firearms and making bomb threats. Look, you're allowed to be vilified. We're allowed to vilify you. You vilify us. You're vilifying this person is vilifying Elon Musk and the people on Twitter who disagree with them right now. But it's like CNN has some story where they said that Elon Musk was using the Twitter files to discredit his opponents. And like this was very bad. It's like this piece, everything that you put out on Elon Musk is literally to discredit him, but it's different when they do it. That's bare culpability for the violence that ensues. No, they don't. That's insane. The Williams Institute. Olivia there said that Elon Musk bears and people who call out groomers and people who strip for children, grown men that strip for that. We are culpable for any violence that happens and no evidence is given of this violence, by the way. And I want to also show you what Biden said yesterday because it ties into this. Excuse me because they support LGBTQ children and families. We have to speak out. We must stop the hate and violence like we just saw in Colorado Springs were a place of acceptance and celebration. Yeah, the place where the non-binary person shot up a place. It's just like the other shooting, the Pulse nightclub where the gay guy shot up the nightclub. Like they want to make these things about their narratives, but they're not and they just lie. He's just lying. Like we already know this guy. It was not like some anti-gay guy. You know how you quit hearing about that guy and that story totally because if they report about it and it's just like the shooting that happened at the nail salon, the white guy and they try to say, well, this is racist shooting even though he shot everybody. He didn't just shoot eight people and he said himself, I had nothing to do with that. These people are just insane. But the president here is lying and he's going to call you a racist, a homophobe, a transphobe and every other phobanism. If you don't agree with him was targeted for violence and terror. We need to challenge the hundreds of callous, cynical laws introduced in the States targeting transgender children, terrifying families. What laws targeting like there's no such thing. He's lying and criminalizing doctors who give children the care they need. We have to protect these children so they know their love and then we will stand up for them and say I can seek for themselves. What? Children? Children? Oh, God. Folks, racism, anti-semitism, homophobia, transphobia, they're all connected. But the antidote to hate is love. Oh, this law. You're shouting and yelling and smearing of, see, like, look at, he just throwing labels at anybody, like anybody. You're a homophobic, a racist, a transphobe. But if you call me a groomer, then you're inciting violence against me. Like, what? Like, I feel like we're in a lot of danger, folks, because this stuff is just so transparent and so easily refuted. The fact that it's just being spread and not refuted, I mean, it's being refuted by me, it's being refuted by, let's be frank and Robert Noir and Salty and everybody else, some people on Fox News, NewsVax, it's happening here and there, but these people, you got to understand that for a big chunk of the country, anybody who's not within that Democrat state media bubble, they just dismiss them as crazy people. And I feel like this is, it's like a bridge when we're never going to be able to gap, or I'm sorry, it's a gap, we're never going to be able to bridge ever. And I feel like it's just leading to a conflict, especially if they start going after free speech in the way that it looks like they are. And here, and you guys probably saw this, it's another great example of this, where they do things they want you to stop doing, like they do it all the time, and then they accuse you of doing that, but then it's like they don't see what they're doing as that. And a threat to our democracy, Mr. Ward. Yes, absolutely. Mr. Siegel. Yes. Ms. Caraballo. Yes. Ms. Nomani. Yes. Ms. Tyler. Yes. So for people who don't know about this clip, she's asking them if they agree, although I disagree with this entire premise that somehow speech is responsible for violence, because we cannot equally apply that standard, so we can't have it at all. We cannot have that standard, because it will only be applied one way. But she gets them all to agree that yes, that's the standard. Okay. Another question I have, Alejandra Caraballo also recently tweeted on November 19th, not even a month ago, that the Supreme Court vested with the judicial power of the United States by our Constitution, stated they are not a legitimate court issuing decisions. And also the Supreme Court is an organ of the far right. So my last question today of Ms. Caraballo, do you stand by these comments? This kind of rhetoric on social media. And I do just want to point out, she called the institution of the Supreme Court compromised. She's attacking the institution. What did we hear for like the entire four years and then two years of Biden from the media and Democrats that attacking institutions is a threat to democracy, that questioning the elections, questioning the election system was attacking the institutions and that thus was a threat to democracy. But all they ever talk about is burning down the institutions and replacing them, just like she is here. And do you believe it's a threat to democracy? Thank you, Representative, for the opportunity to clarify and provide context to my tweets. I have a question. There's no context. Do you believe your rhetoric is a threat to democracy when you're calling to a cost, a branch of government, the Supreme Court? I don't believe that's a correct characterization of my statements. Did you not tweet? I mean, it's right there, right? We can read it. But she's just like, it's not there. No, it's not. I mean, these are people who believe that when they were told to believe that the four lights that they saw behind them were actually, or in front of them were actually five lights, they were like, yeah, when the torture was like, how many fingers am I holding up? They said five and they're like, oh, good, good, good. These tweets, they're just not there. Yeah, no, you're taking me out of context, which is what they always say. There's no context. It's right there. She says that Justice Alito is corrupt. Skotis is a compromise institution of the far right. And in the other tweet that she had there, she said that... Tweet that. A cost. And I've had to... Sorry. She said to accost the Supreme Court justices in public, to accost them. And they can never have a moment of peace, it says. Like she's literally calling like for violence against the Supreme Court justice. But do you think that she see it? Like she doesn't see it that way. She even says it. No, it's different. A district and I... I don't believe that's a correct characterization of my statements. Did you not tweet that? You thought that the Supreme Court justices should be accosted. What I'm saying is that it's not a accurate characterization of my statements. On June 8th of this year, Ma'am was arresting your just... It's not a correct characterization of her statements. Like she's never going to agree that she's inciting violence because it's just different. And that is the threat. That is the very real threat here. I'm going to go back to Trump real quick. So because some of you guys might not have seen this, but I'm not going to play the whole thing. I'm going to kind of go through it, but listen to what Trump says. He's so right and this is like the best I've ever heard Trump speak. I got to be honest. He looks really good and he sounds really good. Although I'm ready to move on from Trump. If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country. It's as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple. Just like Domino's, one by one, they'll go... It's already happening. That's why today I'm announcing my plan to shatter the left-wing censorship regime and to reclaim the right to free speech for all Americans. And reclaim is a very important word in this case because they've taken it away. In recent weeks, bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister group of deep state bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left-wing activists, and depraved corporate news media have been conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people. They have collaborated to suppress vital information on everything from elections to public health. He's speaking really well. Censorship cartel must be dismantled and destroyed, and it must happen immediately. And here's my plan. First... Okay, well, I'll let you... I'm not going to play the plan because it's basically just... We've got to form committees and we've got to keep... We've got to basically put FBI and DOJ employees through rigorous tests to make sure they're not partisan actors. And I'm with a lot of you. I'm kind of done with Trump. This move today, he put out the NFT thing first. Like, that just seems like so not smart to me. He puts out this announcement for the NFT before the announcement about free speech. And, you know, you were already in there once, Trump. You were already in there once and you didn't do any of these things. Like, you knew... We all knew these things were going on already before Trump got in. We all knew this was going on. It just bugged me. Like, I want to like Trump, but I feel like I'm just over. I'm over him, man. I'm over the baggage he brings. I'm over, you know, just fumbles like this where he... It's like he steps... It's like the Simpsons, where Sideshow Bob is walking around and he keeps hitting rakes and they keep smacking him in the face. And he's just like, oh, and he just keeps walking around hitting the... It's like, how many times are we going to like sit through this? Hip-stepping on rakes and smacking himself with the face. Like, I'm ready to move on, honestly. And I hope... I wish you would just kind of bow out and help because at this point now, he's going to like split the vote. He's probably going to hurt it, especially if we have Ron DeSantis running or something. I don't know, it's... There's still a long way off. Who knows? Saying these things now, you have no idea what will happen. Likely, Trump would not win a primary anyway. So, moving on here on the free speech thing, I do want to cover just a couple more things here. So, you saw the hearings and there's more from those hearings, by the way, which I think I'll get to here. But you see here again, I'm not going to play the clip because I just don't want to listen to Pelosi's daughter. But she talks about this Pelosi film which I heard is bombing and she blames conservatives for the January 6th for January 6th and the attack on her father. And she blamed the whole political industrial complex that went and turned my last name into a curse word. Yeah, Pelosi has been unpopular for a long time. I mean, way before Trump, Pelosi was... I would say Rush Limbaugh is probably the guy who really focused the ire on Nancy Pelosi. Like, they do the same thing to Trump. They do the same thing to Bush. Like, Bush was considered a Nazi by Democrats up until he became anti-Trump. So, and here again, you have this sort of bustering by politicians and the media that free speech that is directed against them, against Democrats, just criticism and scrutiny is as violence, literal violence, incites violence against them. They can say whatever they want about you and whatever happens, that's just what... But if it happens to them, well, then they could just play this game and play this standard. It shouldn't work. It's insane. But unfortunately, way too many Americans still don't understand what's going on. And the media's corrupt as hell. And they'll just lie like they've been doing. So, here... A series of attacks on Dr. Anthony Fauci over the weekend calling for his prosecution. And then he shared some other memes about him. And he's lying about the origin of the coronavirus. What's your response? First of all, specifically to the attacks on Dr. Fauci. And secondly, how is your view of Twitter as a sort of public forum and a forum for yourself and for the president and many other officials here? How are those views evolving? God, whoever this guy is, just a fucking lap dog. My God. Dude, clean that boot good, man. Look at that boot. Really, really good. And I just want to point out, have you ever... Have you ever seen anybody in the media? And I've looked. Okay, I've already looked for this. Have you seen any of these people ever characterize their critiques or their, you know... Their critiques will say their scrutiny of Republicans conserved as a Trump. Have they ever characterized those as attacks? Attacks? But that's what they constantly do in the media. If you criticize them, you criticize Fauci, you criticize, you know, Pierre here, Karen John... I forgot her name, KJP. Biden are any of these people and they say that it's inciting violence against them. Like, and you'll see here, that's what she says. So look, we've been very clear about this. These attacks, these personal attacks that we have been seeing are dangerous. Oh, they're dangerous. First speech is so dangerous. And other public health professionals as well, they are disgusting and they are divorced from reality. Oh, they're divorced from... Not you. So attacks, attacks, which are actually just critiques and questions and scrutiny of, in this case, they're talking about Fauci, who is an unelected bureaucrat, right? Who you would think above all, you want those guys, you want oversight and scrutiny, the most intense scrutiny that you can possibly levy towards them, because especially, especially with something as big as COVID, where it's looking more and more, I saw some news just a little bit ago that there's a new report coming out showing that it most likely, that COVID most likely came from China's biological weapons lab, from the Wuhan lab, or it was a bio weapon and did escape from the lab. So, and you remember, when people first started asking that, they attacked the people asking it, saying, oh, their conspiracy theorist, the fact that this is coming from the White House, that is incredibly dangerous. That is dangerous for the White House and Democrats and for the media, a big chunk of the media to now decide that basically only they have freedom of speech, only they have the right to critique and scrutinize their opposition. You're not allowed to do that, you see, because they're saving their earth, they're saving democracy, which means that anybody who stands against them by default must be the bad guys, right? And that is literally what we're dealing with here, folks. And I think that's pretty much it on that. Oh yeah, and you guys heard that they're actually investigating Elon Musk now, his citizenship. So, these people who want to keep, who want the borders to be open and everybody to come in, they're going to kick Elon Musk out if they can find any reason to. Like, it's just unbelievable the links these people will go to to silence their political opposition, to suppress and demonize their opposition, and yet they still think they're the good guys. It's unbelievable. So, I think I'm pretty much that, basically I'm going to a Christmas party tonight and I didn't have time really to get into a video and edit and all that, so I just figured I'd do a live stream. I haven't done a live stream in a while and thought I'd take another shot at it. Maybe you guys can let me know how this one went. I personally think it went better than most of my past live streams. I did want to go through and read some comments here. Oh, yeah. Kristen Godet says that, I'm sure they told him he needs coaching on his behavior on television, how he speaks. Yeah, for sure. Trump is definitely beginning some lessons on that because he did sound better. I'll say that, but, and it sucks. I hate saying I'm over Trump. I'd really do because I wish he were, I wish he were up to it, up to the task, but I just, I don't think he is. I feel like his heart is in the right place and he's on the right track on a lot of different things, but ultimately I think, I think it's time for him to retire. His ego will be his downfall while I think we've seen that. Hey, for the win now, what's up, buddy? One of my mods, I haven't seen you in a while. Joe will never be impeached, nope. And that's partially because Republicans are worthless. They're just worthless. They get power and then they don't want to do anything with it. They don't want to get along and unify against their political foes. They don't want to make the case of the American people that they actually believe in the things they claim to believe in. They say it up until the point they get voted in and then all they want to do is be friends with people in the media and the Democrats. They just want to get into those circles and then they don't give a shit about the rest of us. Trump, C. Jones says, Trump not win a primary question mark? I wouldn't count him out. I wouldn't count him out. But like I said, there is a lot of time between now and the primaries, much less the election. And I'll tell you, a lot can happen in just a couple of weeks, much less months and years. So anything that we're saying here is so hypothetical. In fact, I should come back and do a video about this live stream after the election in 2024. We'll compare what actually happened. He will be sworn in by the Supreme Court. John says, yeah, Internet God. I miss Rush. Me too, man. I miss him all the time. Doesn't it feel like maybe I'm wrong here? Maybe I'm all alone. But it seems like since Rush died, they've upped it. They've really upped their push for their agenda. Like they know he's not there anymore. And he was a big stumbling block for them for them. He was just so able to articulate what they were doing and what we should do again and what we should do against it. He was just so good at that. There's just not a replacement for him, unfortunately. Robin Spielman. Hey, Robin. Hey, DroneTech. My favorite Buckeye. Yeah, Buckeyes. I used to love the Buckeyes, but they just disappoint me over and over again. Jennifer. Hey, Jennifer, what's up? Jennifer Cockfeld. Sorry, I'm like smacking my lips a lot in the camera. There was some Let's Be Frank there. You were not allowed to call out Democrats. Let's Be Frank says, yep, you're just not allowed. It's dangerous. And like I was saying, you know, they're saving democracy in the world. And if you stand in the way of that, well, then you're just a bad guy. And who really cares what happens to you? You're barely even human. Yeah. Richard Craniam says, I like this chat. Proof we don't have to goose step in time to move in the same direction. Yeah, exactly. Hilarious. Let's see here. DeSantis is a swamper. Oh, yeah. And folks, let me tell you, and this will be the last thing I say, because I got to start getting ready to go to this Christmas party. But I will say this about dropping Trump and moving on from Trump is that if you think that that's going to stop the media or the Democrats or the narrative, you know, your white supremacist, you know, your leaders or white supremacist and racist, get over it because it's not going to stop. It's literally like whoever comes up next will get the exact same treatment that Trump has gotten. If it's Ron DeSantis, he'll get the same treatment. And you can go back. I mean, Reagan. Reagan got the same treatment. They called him dumb. They called him racist. They called him white supremacist. They called him a Nazi. All that same stuff then Bush senior gets in. They called him all that stuff. Although Bush senior was so like middle ground. And I'm I'm I was pretty young at that point. I don't really remember that. That's right around when I started getting into politics because Desert Storm started. And that's really what started to get me into the media news. So I remember that, but I don't really remember how Bush senior was treated. But I do remember how Bush, George W. Bush was treated. And they say thing. He was a racist. He was an idiot. White supremacist Nazi and war criminal. But and then, you know, Trump comes along and it's this. That's the same old playbook all over again. I find it hilarious that Bush is, you know, suddenly in their good graces because he joined them, which is just weird. It's like they probably just gave him that ultimatum like, oh, well, the only way you're coming back into the fold after everything you did is to just, you know, side with us, essentially. And you're like, oh, okay, whatever. So I can't stand Bush anymore. But yeah, just realize that whoever we get, it's going to be the same, which I hate to be, you know, I sound like I'm blackpilling, trying to blackpill you all when I say that kind of stuff. I'm not. There are obviously ways that we can fight back. And we should, we should keep fighting back. We should keep doing what we're doing. Support, you know, channels like mine, like Let's Be Frank, Robert New War, all these guys who really deserve it. And are really at some point, I mean, if we lose the media, we lose everything else. That's, that's going to be it. We lose YouTube. We're all going to be on our own sub stacks or whatever doing the same thing. And that's, that's just, that's just what we got to do. Hopefully at some point, the pendulum will swing back the other way and we can correct some of this stuff. But, well, everybody, thanks for watching. I really appreciate it. I would suggest that you go and follow me on Twitter. I'm pretty active on there. Twitter's a lot more fun on place at this point. So I'll put a link for that. I keep, there you go. Definitely come and follow me on there. You can follow me on Rumble as well. I am on Rumble now. I've been on Rumble forever, but nobody seems to know I'm there even though I talk about it here and there. Obviously I'm not doing it enough. Let me get that link here real quick. There is my Rumble, which I think you can get all this stuff in the, yeah, all this, all these links are in my description. So, and also prepare with DroneTech. If you want to support this channel, prepare with DroneTech is a great way. Christmas is coming up. It's a great gift. You can also, I have PayPal if you'd like to donate and support. It's something I, you know, I've had people in the audience who have been doing that for me for years. And I can't tell you how much I appreciate it between you guys and the sponsors. It's the only reason I've been able to keep going all these years. So really appreciate it. Glad to see you all again. Let me know in the comments what you think about this live stream. If you liked it, I might start doing like an afternoon live stream. I much better in the afternoon than the evenings. I have three kids, two of them I'm with all day and they just turn my brain into mush. Anybody who's raised kids all day has been a stay at home mother or father knows. So I'd much rather do live streams in the afternoon like this. It's a lot better. So just let me know what you think. Maybe we'll get this going every week. And I start bringing people like Frank on and Robert. And we can have a good stream maybe start from this. So really appreciate you all watching. Thanks a lot. And I will see you all on the next one. Later.