 All right, so we tend to celebrate leadership. We do that in sports, we do that in politics, in social movements, and in war conflicts. And we tend to create the impression that leadership is what you need to get you through some difficult times. So we romanticize the idea of a general George Washington crossing the Delaware to attack the Hessians overnight, defeat them, and change the course of the Revolutionary War. But that doesn't tell the real story. That is misleading, is actually detrimental for the long term of a community in particular. So what this doesn't tell is the story of all the other people who are doing work for this to actually happen. This is the USS Lexington, it's a chief that was challenging the British Navy in order to bring supplies to the Revolutionary Army. When you emphasize too much leadership, you don't take into account the war that goes into the food troops that are actually doing the real part of the work. So essentially leadership is overrated and is misleading and is detrimental to the long term health of the community. So because what happened in the dynamics is that when you have a group of people, when you elevate the leader, then you also diminish everybody else. So you have somebody that is more visible and then suddenly everybody else is a little bit on the back. The leadership, the leader creates the followers or the mentality of the follower. And it makes those followers mushy and it's slow and a little bit lazy and a little bit dependent. It disables the critical thinking of those who are being led. And Noam Chosky warns us against it. The admiration towards the leader is actually a weakness of the ones who are being followed or the ones who are following him. So the worst part of leadership is that leaves the community members of the hook. It's not their problem. The leader will take care of that. He will tell us what to do. It's not my problem. I just need to wait until I receive instructions and then I will do whatever he says. And the worst part of this is that makes the community vulnerable to a variety of problems. For example, decapitation attacks, alien abductions, vampires, zombies, and the worst enemy of all, the city boss. So what we have to learn of this is that instead of creating that environment of the leader and the followers, we have to educate and cultivate the characteristic of everybody else in the community. Everybody is helping to push and the leader should be unnecessary. The best leader is the one that is never noticed. You want to create this community where there is no hierarchical structure of command and control. Everybody will be able to take over whatever needs to be done and things will get done. So that's kind of the moment of sin is that instead of cultivating that leadership, we should have this environment where the most skilled leader is the one that is not being noticed. It's behind the scenes. It's actually helping everybody else to do what they need to do. So when things are done the perfect way, people say we did it. It was not the leader who tells us what to do. It's not George Washington who helped us or told us how to cross the river. Then you have a very stable, very strong community because everything will be done and nobody is indispensable. So this is Peter Blogged. He has this great advice. It's stop being so helpful, let everybody else do something and take charge of what they need to do in their communities. Thank you.