 area asked that the battery almost by hearting syllabus I was surprised that in the ecosystem, even teachers can't record syllabus. I was surprised in GS in particular, the vast students can tell us, you know syllabus of geography in GS. Like they said something. I said, no, tell me exactly how it's worded and the reason why it's worded like that because if syllabus is not understood, then you know the place. Again, I found most of them, okay. 57 said no, maybe, and those who said yes also had doubt if they like to study syllabus. You must ask yourself if you have done it or not. Like how many toppers have you talked to? What you are seeing in this ecosystem, there is no dearth of advisors. I'm sure some of you have become advisors of your juniors also, okay. I mean, it's a very in thing. One guy who comes one before in the cycle, he becomes advisors for somebody else. So there's no dearth of advisors. And with YouTube boom and internet boom, everybody is a great scholar in UPSC preparation. Okay, my experience tells me the people who should tell you about subject is essentially the people who have qualified. I mean, it's worth it because it's examination where you spend almost three, four, five years of your life. If you call all generations, following your life will change. Your life changing the 100%. But the generations that follow, the entire society you live in, they all get changed. So in this kind of high-stake examination, I encourage the go and talk to people of qualified. Do what it takes. If I am starting institute, I should talk to people who have been successfully in the institute running. If I am going to become engineer, I could talk to some guys who have become engineer. I found 78% said they talk to one or two guys, and most of them said they have no access to talking to the toppers who qualified. And for this one, if this subject has best overlap, 60% almost geography has a great overlap. I do not know what you have answered, though we will add that in our data eventually. So this tells me three things. Number one, when you make a choice and optional or a study method, most of us do not have a structured approach. We go by hearsay. You talk some of this guy, that guy, we have a good feeling. And this one, ease of study and length of syllabus should not be that criteria when you enter examination of this level. It's a high-stake examination. And I'm sure you know that fact, the exam is very tough. I mean, if anybody says it's easy, okay, he does not go to examination, now he's lying through his teeth. Okay, I don't, 60, 150, 200 qualified in the proper IES. Again, results, 900 results. So say it's easy, it's impossible. So your mindset is that type of expired. But if you're so, I think we have got the whole process wrong here itself. In this preparation, there cannot be anything called as ease of study. You have to get out of comfort zones. You have to be highly inconvenienced. So people come and tell me that it is a difficult, it is unnerving, it is tough. Again, this examination has no compulsion to make you comfortable. And if you qualify, your life becomes all the more uncomfortable for that matter. So ease of study cannot be a at all. Length of syllabus is a misnomer because if the syllabus is not defined well, it'll be a short syllabus. If the, I'll tell you how. I must be on the syllabus. Syllabus you should know, but don't choose by small number of syllabus. Unless there are some who's lose interest, one of them have said interest also, but this is how students make choices. Okay, so that is where I begin my.